Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

2.38s

  • Kelly v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    900 A.2d 476 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2006

    In Martin v. … See, e.g., Hears v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 851 A.2d 1003 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); Jones v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 831 A.2d 162 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005). In Melhorn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Baum v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Hitchcock)

    721 A.2d 402 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1998

    Hunter v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Jack Greenberg Co.), 706 A.2d 403 (Pa.Cmwlth.), petition for allowance of appeal denied, — Pa. —, — A.2d — (1998); North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. … Tri-Union Express v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Hickle), 703 A.2d 558 (Pa.Cmwlth. 1997). .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • York Township Board of Commissioners v. Batty

    694 A.2d 395 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1997

    Mechanicsburg Area School District v. Kline, 494 Pa. 476 , 431 A.2d 953 (1981); Fontaine v. Wissahickon School District, 658 A.2d 851 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995). … Kazmarek v. New Bethlehem Borough Council, 84 Pa. Cmwlth. 19, 478 A.2d 514 (1984).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rathvon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    663 A.2d 893 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 1995

    However, this Court has previously upheld the Board’s application of Section 404(d)(2) of the Law under similar circumstances. In Grace v. … Peoples First National Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 159 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 134, 632 A.2d 1014 (1993). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Abraham

    88 Pa. Commw. 244 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1985

    The Board argues that the trial court committed an error of law. … Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Grand Marcus One, Inc., 69 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 483 , 451 A.2d 810 (1982). The licensee relies on the case of Old Express Limited Appeal, 70 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rossi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    675 A.2d 390 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1996

    In Gaetani v. … Dingbat’s v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 73 , 552 A.2d 1157 (1989). .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Smalls v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    823 A.2d 274 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 12, 2003

    Nickens v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 93 Pa.Cmwlth. 313 , 502 A.2d 277, 281 (1985), citing United States v. Daniels, 527 F.2d 1147 (6th Cir.1975). … This case is similar to Hawkins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 88 Pa.Cmwlth. 547 , 490 A.2d 942 (1985).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    120 Pa. Commw. 336 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1988

    In support of this argument, the Board cites Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Bald Eagle Area School District, 499 Pa. 62 , 451 A.2d 671 (1982);- East Pennsboro Area School District v. … The Board argues that when in Commonwealth v.

    Reversed by Office of Admin. v. LABOR REL. BD., 528 Pa. 472 (1991)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pittsburgh Board of Public Education v. Commonwealth

    128 Pa. Commw. 324 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1989

    (quoting Leedom v. Thomas, 473 Pa. 193, 200 , 373 A.2d 1329, 1332 (1977)). … Yuhas v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), 82 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 390, 476 A.2d 1377 (1984). .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Budco Theatres, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    159 Pa. Commw. 257 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1993

    In Fassman v. … Where the trial court received no additional evidence, this court's scope of review is limited to a determination of whether the zoning hearing board abused its discretion or committed an error of law. *262 Johnson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Eckert v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    33 Pa. Commw. 390 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1978

    See Kuykendall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 26 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 234 , 363 A.2d 866 (1976). … However, Board concedes that in accordance with our decision in Mitchell v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 31 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board

    78 Pa. Commw. 597 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1983

    The Board’s reliance upon the Department of Transportation v. Lisbon, 46 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 90 , 405 A.2d 1128 (1979) is misplaced. … Cianfrani directs us to Baehr *604 Brothers v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Liquor Control Board v. Northwest Athletic Ass'n

    8 Pa. Commw. 114 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1973

    In November of 1962, Northwest placed its license in escrow with the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board). … Liquor License Case, 395 Pa. 355, 363 , 150 A. 2d 112 , 117 (1959), our Supreme Court, quoting from Cavanaugh v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nortim, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    150 Pa. Commw. 196 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1992

    MacNeill v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Denny’s Inc.), 120 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 320, 548 A.2d 680 (1988). … Equitable Gas Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Haines), 82 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 436, 474 A.2d 1239 (1984). The burden is on the employer to establish a reasonable contest, McConnell v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Agnew v. Bushkill Township Zoning Hearing Board

    837 A.2d 634 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 2003

    Bray v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 48 Pa.Cmwlth. 523 , 410 A.2d 909 (1980). … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 401 , 143 A.2d 59 (1958) (barber shop); Dore v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kimbob Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    12 Pa. Commw. 92 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1974

    See Hinkle v. H. J. Heinz Co., 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 216 , 298 A. 2d 632 (1972). The propriety of the Board’s substitution of its finding for that of the referee is the narrow issue presented by this appeal. … Gobain Corporation v. Kordalski, 11 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 388 , 314 A. 2d 40 (1974); cf. Universal Cyclops Steel Corporation v. Krawczynski, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Copperweld Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    73 Pa. Commw. 478 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1983

    Modern Transfer v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 592 , 408 A.2d *481 900 (1979). … Analogizing that testimony to the medical evidence in Haney v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 65 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shearer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    26 Pa. Commw. 444 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1976

    Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Patsy, 21 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 341 , 345 A.2d 785 (1975). … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Hart, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 225 , 348 A.2d 497 (1975). Evidence is substantial when a reasonable man, acting reasonably, could base a conclusion thereon. O’Keefe v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stephens v. Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing

    657 A.2d 71 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1995

    Bresch v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 42 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 192, 401 *75 A.2d 381 (1979). … For example, in Beatty v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Crocker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    63 A.3d 496 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2013

    Kress v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 23 A.3d 632, 636 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011). … Zerbe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 545 Pa. 406, 411 , 681 A.2d 740, 742 (1996). .

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.