Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.74s

  • Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    69 Pa. Commw. 530 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1982

    The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the referee’s decision, writing: the additional compensation provided by [Section 306(h)] was to be paid by the employer or insurance carrier, but was to be reimbursed in advance … Order And Now, this 4th day of November, 1982, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and the referee is reversed. The case is remanded for further proceedings on the merits. Judge MacPhail dissents.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Vereen

    29 Pa. Commw. 252 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1977

    As we "stated in Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Iacano, Pa. … See Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Filips, 18 Pa.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Falcone v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    72 A.3d 301 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2013

    Falcone (Claimant), pro se, petitions for review of an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board). … Claimant appealed to the Board, and the Board affirmed the Referee’s decision. (C.R., Item No. 10.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Friel v. Board of Pensions & Retirement

    63 Pa. Commw. 575 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1981

    Eetirement (Board) that Friel was not presently entitled to receive separation service retirement benefits. … Both the Board and the court below found Friel to be ineligible for advanced eligibility and denied his application.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Sanitary Water Board

    4 Pa. Commw. 407 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1972

    While appellant *424 in the use and enjoyment of its property is subject to reasonable exercise of the police power, Bortz Coal Company v. Commonwealth, 2 Pa. … Dolan v. Linton’s Lunch, 397 Pa. 114 , 152 A. 2d 887 (1959); Evans v. West Norriton Twp. Municipal Authority, 370 Pa. 150 , 87 A. 2d 474 (1952); Fidelity Philadelphia Trust Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co., 452 Pa. 77 (1973)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kohut v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    163 Pa. Commw. 266 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1994

    The order of the Board is affirmed. ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 1994, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board at No. A91-0374 is affirmed. . Kohut v. … Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Sebro), 132 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 288, 572 A.2d 843 (1990).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Delaney v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    28 Pa. Commw. 453 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1977

    Luckenbach v. Luckenbach, 443 Pa. 417 , 281 A.2d 169 (1971); Commonwealth v. Yorktowne Paper Mills, Inc., 419 Pa. 363 , 214 A.2d 203 (1965). … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Duffy, 23 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 7 , 349 A.2d 925 (1976); Sanabria v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 42 , 317 A.2d 56 (1974).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Naimoli v. Zoning Hearing Board of Chester

    56 Pa. Commw. 337 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1981

    See also Hager v. Manheim Township Zoning Hearing Board, 23 Pa. … Cohen v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 50, 276 A.2d 352 (1971).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • CNA Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    134 Pa. Commw. 478 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 1990

    Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 506 Pa. 592 , 487 A.2d 794 (1985). … In Department of Labor & Industry v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. State Board of Veterinary Medicine

    863 A.2d 129 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2004

    In Pennsylvania State Police v. … See Watkins v. State Board of Dentistry, 740 A.2d 760 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Helicopters v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Cobb)

    713 A.2d 1181 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1998

    This Court held in Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of America, 26 Pa. … Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (National Fuel Gas), 117 Pa.Cmwlth. 320 , 544 A.2d 535 (1988).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gilmour Properties v. Board of Assessment Appeals

    873 A.2d 64 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2005

    While not controlling, they are not irrelevant-” [McKnight Shopping Center, Inc., v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 417 Pa. 234, 242-243 , 209 A.2d 389, 393 (1965)] (Emphasis added.) … Id. at 440 n. 4 (quoting F & M Schaeffer Brewing Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Litton Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    78 Pa. Commw. 79 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1983

    In McGartland v. … In Reading Tube Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 45 , 315 A.2d 678 (1974), the claimant suffered injuries which required the amputation of his right index finger.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McGraw-Edison v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    120 Pa. Commw. 19 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1988

    Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Klein), 77 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 67 , 465 A.2d 81 (1983). … Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Glover v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    874 A.2d 692 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2005

    Therefore, we are constrained to agree with the Board that the grant of additional TRA benefits is not permitted. While there are no cases on point, our legal conclusion is in accordance with Daman v. … Nolan v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 191 A.2d 1042 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). 6 . The Board concedes there are no cases directly on point. 7 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    71 Pa. Commw. 36 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1983

    Senecal v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 180 , 425 A.2d 1200 (1981). … Buttonwood Farms v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 357 , 446 A.2d 983 (1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Body Shop v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    720 A.2d 795 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1998

    The Body Shop (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting in part the penalty and review petitions filed by Gerald … State Workmen’s Insurance Fund v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wagner), 677 A.2d 892 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Williams

    23 Pa. Commw. 188 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1976

    O’Keefe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 151 , 333 A.2d 815 (1975). … Weaver and Sons v. Sanitary Water Board, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 499 , 284 A.2d 515 (1971).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Leone v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    885 A.2d 76 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 2005

    Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 567 Pa. 298 , 787 A.2d 284 (2001). 2 . … Graham v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 840 A.2d 1054 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Cataldi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    738 A.2d 1074 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1999

    Calcara v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (St. Joseph Hospital), 706 A.2d 1286 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998). … Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Skirpan), 531 Pa. 287 , 612 A.2d 434 (1992).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.