Case law

Allen v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Commw. 250 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1994

When the Board makes its own findings of fact, it is the Board’s findings, not the referee’s, that are subject to our review. Viglino v. … Claimant cites Kowal v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 99 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 234, 512 A.2d 812 (1986) and Longacre, Inc. v.

Weigle v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

886 A.2d 1183 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2005

In Cox v. … This Court addressed another factual variation in Torres v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 861 A.2d 394 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004).

Gaudenzia, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

84 Pa. Commw. 482 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1984

(Board) of the application of Gaudenzia, Inc. … On February 21, 1979, the Board granted a special exception to Alcoholism 'Services, Inc.

Burrows v. Commonwealth, State Employes' Retirement Board

76 Pa. Commw. 84 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1983

Opinion by Judge Doyle, Before this Court is an appeal by LaVerne Burrows (Petitioner) from a decision and order of the State Employes’ Retirement Board (Board) denying Petitioner’s application for a disability annuity. … Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 417 Pa. 299 , 208 A.2d 271 (1965).

Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

78 Pa. Commw. 227 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1983

Opinion by Judge MacPhail, Pollock-Columbia (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County which reversed a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Columbia (Board … We accordingly, will affirm on the basis of the able opinion of Judge Buokwalter, Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Columbia, Pa.

Price v. Bensalem Township Zoning Hearing Board

131 Pa. Commw. 200 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1990

Filanowski v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 439 Pa. 360 , 266 A.2d 670 (1970). In oral argument before this court, counsel for Price, relying on Hatchigian v. Koch, 381 Pa. … of Bensalem Township v.

Tidd v. Lower Saucon Township Zoning Hearing Board

118 A.3d 1 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 2015

Of further note, in Holmes v. … See, e.g., Singer v. Phila. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 29.

Davis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

134 Pa. Commw. 643 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1990

Petitioner also argues that Corley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 83 Pa. … Smith v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 524 Pa. 500 , 574 A.2d 558 (1990).

Philadelphia Board of Pensions & Retirement v. Amanto

97 Pa. Commw. 550 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 1986

In Board of Pensions and Retirement of Philadelphia v. Hodge, 72 Pa. … This Court noted in Bell v. Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, 84 Pa.

Stringent v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

703 A.2d 1084 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1997

Kerner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 68 Pa.Cmwlth. 132 , 448 A.2d 666 (1982). … See Mosko v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 199 Pa. Superior Ct. 73 , 184 A.2d 395 (1962).

White v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

833 A.2d 819 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2003

See Stewart v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 714 A.2d 502 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998). … Compare Sanders v.

Garman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

75 Pa. Commw. 607 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1983

This order was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and the claimant has now petitioned this court to review the Board’s order. We affirm. … Order affirmed. *612 Order And Now, this 22nd day of July, 1983, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board in the above-captioned matter is hereby affirmed.

Barnett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

29 Pa. Commw. 581 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1977

Sturniolo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 475 , 338 A.2d 794 (1975). … Lynch v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 210 , 359 A.2d 834 (1976); Blystone v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 180 , 342 A.2d 772 (1975).

At & T v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

728 A.2d 381 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1999

Warminster Fiberglass v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Jorge), 708 A.2d 517 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998). … Mercy Douglas Corp. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Davis), 713 A.2d 722, 725 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998).

Bell v. Board of Pensions & Retirement

61 Pa. Commw. 379 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1981

While the claimant contends that, as a result of the Board employee’s advice, he was misled, he does not allege intent to mislead or fraud on the part of the Board employee. … His failure to exercise that option cannot be attributed to the Board.

Rauso v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation

762 A.2d 774 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2000

Myers v. Ridge, 712 A.2d 791, 795 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998). … Myers v. Ridge, 712 A.2d 791 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998). However, we need not accept the following as true: conclusions of law, unwarranted inferences, argumentative allegations or expressions of opinion. Id.

Mazzoni v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

115 Pa. Commw. 630 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1988

Rinaldi, attorneys, petition for review of a decision of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (board) which ruled, in the particular circumstances of this case, that “the defendants insurance carrier is not required to … Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the board. Order Now, May 4, 1988, the order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board, dated December 13, 1984, No. C.F. 2466, A-83010, is affirmed.

Bortner v. Board of Finance & Revenue

9 Pa. Commw. 89 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 1973

State Board of Pharmacy v. Bersh

1 Pa. Commw. 132 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1971

Opinion Per Curiam, The only question presented to this Court by the appellant is whether this case should be remanded for a hearing by the State Board of Pharmacy (Board). … It is therefore the opinion of this Court that the exceptions to the Board’s actions should be dismissed and the order of the State Board of Pharmacy affirmed.

School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

109 Pa. Commw. 463 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 1987

Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). … Jones v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 65 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 208 , 442 A.2d 37 (1982).