Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

4.31s

  • Talmage v. Burlingame & Irons

    9 Pa. 21 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1848

    Mainwaring, 8 Taunt. 139; Brown v. Brown, 4 Taunt. 752; Schermerhorn v. Schermerhorn, 1 Wend. 119 ; and he, therefore, is still a party *26 interested in the event of the action. … It occurred in Wolf v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sessions, C. v. WCAB (City of Phila.)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 2019

    Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CITY OF PHILADELPHIA), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rhoads v. Fisher

    293 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1928

    The findings and award of the referee, the affirmance of the compensation board and the opinion of the court below unite in answering this question in the affirmative. … Our investigation is accordingly limited to the questions of law raised by the record and is somewhat analogous to our review in an appeal from the confirmation of an auditor’s report or decree in equity: Kuca v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Churchman v. Smith

    6 Whart. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1841

    Pitman v. Maddox, (Salk. 690.) … Curren v. Crawford, ( 4 Serg. & Rawle, 5 .) They are not admissible to show a collateral fact. Juniata Bank v. Brown, (5 Serg. & Rawle, 226 .)

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Medina, H. v. WCAB (UPS Ground Freight)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 2019

    Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eisenberg v. COM., DEPT. OF PUB. WEL.

    512 Pa. 181 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1986

    v. … Lee v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Quartz v. Pittsburgh

    340 Pa. 277 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1940

    Brown, 264 Pa. 85, 92 , 107 A. 676, 679 ; Commonwealth v. Prescott, 284 Pa. 255, 259, 260 , 131 A. 184, 185 ; Williams v. Lumbermen’s Insurance Co., 332 Pa. 1, 9 , 1 A. 2d 658, 662 ; Brenner v. … . & R. 92, 97; Riddlesburg Iron & Coal Co. v. Rogers, 65 Pa. 416, 418 ; Ott v. Oyer’s Executrix, 106 Pa. 6, 19 ; Chitwood v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 266 Pa. 435, 438 , 109 A. 645, 646 ; Noreika v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Planamento, D. v. WCAB of: US Airways

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2016

    PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT DAVID PLANAMENTO : No. 362 EAL 2016 : : v … : Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Commonwealth : Court WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGregor Estate v. Young Township

    350 Pa. 93 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1944

    Board of Supervisors. … In Bullitt v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Baatz, D., Aplt. v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 2018

    : Appellant : : Appeal from the order of the : Commonwealth Court dated May 31, v … : 2017 at No. 10 MD 2017 : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carbajosa-Eronico, E. v. UCBR

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2016

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greene County Coal Tax Appeals

    302 Pa. 179 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1930

    Appellants’ counsel state their position thus: Township assessors and county commissioners sitting as a board of revision may not assess all bituminous coal in the Pittsburgh or river vein within the territorial limits of … learned court below that this position is not tenable;......courts can only compel a valuation of the lands under consideration to be made upon the basis of general uniformity in the district”: Mineral Railroad & Mining Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Linda L. Ziembicki

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 2019

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2568 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 9 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Warrington v. Brooklyn Trust Co.

    274 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1922

    Brown, who died September 14,1919, she devised the properties 1208, 1210 and 1212 South Carlisle Street in the City of Philadelphia to plaintiff, and gave the residue of her estate to the Brooklyn Trust Company, one of the … If they do begin it, they cannot afterwards discontinue it, or suffer a nonsuit, (Seabrook v. Swarthmore College, 65 Pa. 74 ; Vansant v. Boileau, 1 Binney *83 444, 448; Walter v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Milisits, J. v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2017

    : No. 162 MM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, : : Respondent

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kimberly Clark Corp. v. WCAB (Bromley)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 2017

    Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (BROMLEY), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mt. Joy Twnship Pet of: Herrick Bld & Exca

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2017

    COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT MOUNT JOY TOWNSHIP : No. 883 MAL 2016 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : MOUNT JOY TOWNSHIP ZONING : HEARING BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: Promulgation of Financial Regulations Pursuant to Act 93 of 2021

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2021

    Other actions not included in subsections (i), (ii) or (iii), such as: Appeals from Board of Elections, Appeals from Board of Viewers, Appeals from Zoning Boards, and Certiorari to Magisterial … v. Pittsburgh Municipal Court. Criminal Actions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roos v. Silk Mills (B. Co. Tr. Co.)

    342 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1941

    L. 7, 12 PS § 782, “interest is a legal incident of every judgment: Cochran v. Cummings, 4 Dallas, 250 ; Commonwealth v. Miller, 8 S. & R. 452. … ‘Where the terms of an obligation comprehend interest, it is inaccurate to say interest is added by way of damages, for it is a substantive part of the debt as much as the principal is Hummel v. Brown, 24 Pa. 310 .”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Craig Cohen

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2019

    OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2593 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 52 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217, and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.