Case law

Serventi v. Galli

347 Pa. 47 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1943

He also “told her to pay my board and keep the rest”; that is, “Put away for me to keep.” … McCollum v. Braddock Trust Co., 330 Pa. 293 , 198 A. 803 . Defendant’s answer may be regarded as an account rendered pursuant to the prayer of the bill.

Upholsterers' International Union v. United Furniture Workers

356 Pa. 469 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1947

See *473 also Koontz v. Messer, 314 Pa. 434”: Welser v. Ealer, supra, at p. 184 . … Compare Squire v. Fridenberg, 126 Pa. Superior Ct. 508, 513 , 191 A. 631 , with *475 Hickey v. Philadelphia Electric Company, 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 213, 214 , 184 A. 553 .

Commonwealth v. Romolini

384 Pa. Super. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1989

Patrick v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 110 Pa.Comm. 121, 532 A.2d 487 (1987); Fleegle v. … Pennsylvania Board of Proba *127 tion and Parole, 110 Pa.Comm. 142, 532 A.2d 50 (1987); Reider v.

Commonwealth v. Pomponi

447 Pa. 154 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1971

Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148 (1958) ; Fitzpatrick v. United States, 178 U.S. 304 . … These cases are far stronger for the Commonwealth than the instant ease and the issue involved herein, and the principles enunciated in Brown and Fitzpatrick undoubtedly control the instant case and require a reversal of

Wexler v. Hecht

593 Pa. 118 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2007

See, e.g., Creighan v. … City of Philadelphia v. Civil Serv.

In re Morris's Estate

4 Pa. 162 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1846

As auxiliary to this view of the case, I cite Smith v. Miller, 13 Serg. & Rawle, 340 . The decree of the court is reversed, and the judgment in favour of Abraham Franks, endorsee of the German Bank of Wooster v. … William Morris, endorser of Richard Brown, No. 37, September, 1834, is directed to.be first paid out . of the fund in court.

Fox v. Mensch

3 Watts & Serg. 444 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842

In Morgan v. Richards, (1 P. A. Browne’s Rep. 173), Judge Rush intimated that a contract made on Sunday was void at common law. But in the case of Kepner v. … As is said in Bashore v. Whis *447 ler, ( 3 Watts 490 ), it was the folly of the purchaser to repose confidence in his opinion or promise.

Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOON

508 Pa. 495 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1985

. § 1921(c); Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School District, 461 Pa. 494 , 337 A.2d 262 (1975); Commonwealth v. … See also Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Martin v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

282 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1925

Martin, his daughter, aged seventeen years, signaled a trolley car of defendant company to stop and take her aboard; the car came to a standstill and she indicated her intention to board it by the right rear entrance, but … The court below very properly entered judgment for defendant: see Klingensmith v. West Penn Ry. Co., 279 Pa. 336, 339 . The judgment is affirmed.

Ringrose v. Ringrose

170 Pa. 593 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1895

In the case of Wusthoff v. … In the case of Ogden v.

Kuhns v. Gettysburg National Bank

68 Pa. 445 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1871

It is hardly necessary to refer to the long list of cases in this court which establish this rule: Holme v. Karsper, 5 Binn. 469 ; Beltzhoover v. Blackstock, 3 Watts 26 ; Knight v. Pugh, 4 W. & S. 448 ; Brown v. … Street, 6 Id. 221; Albrecht v. Strimpler, 7 Barr 476. Many others might be cited.

Hoxie v. Chamberlain

228 Pa. 31 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1910

A devise with power to give a fee, passes a fee: Brown’s Est., 38 Pa. 289 ; Chxirch v. Disbrow, 52 Pa. 219 ; Witmer v. Delone, 225 Pa. 450 .

Hinkle v. HJ Heinz Company

462 Pa. 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1975

Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 10 Pa. Cmwlth. 247, 249, 309 A.2d 842 (1973); Carpinelli v. Penn Steel Castings Co., 209 Pa.Super. 390, 394 , 227 A.2d 912 (1967). … In Winkleman v.

Lonzer v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

196 Pa. 610 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 1900

It was the duty of deceased to examine this bulletin board before starting and at the end of each run, that is, six times every day that the notice was up,- and the inference *613 is irresistible that he must have seen it … The verdict should have been set aside as in direct disregard of the evidence, and where that is the case, the court may refuse to submit it at all and direct a verdict accordingly: Holland v.

Pascal, S., Aplts v. City of Pgh ZBA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 2021

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Philadelphia Eagles Football Club, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia

573 Pa. 189 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2003

See Rohmer v. … Co. v.

McMullin's Estate

272 Pa. 284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1922

The company, through its board of directors, performs the obligations of its charter^ not the shareholders as such. … They are an intangible asset, created through federal laws: Com. v. Westinghouse, etc., Co., 151 Pa. 265, 275 ; Com. v. Edison Electric Light Co., 157 Pa. 529, 530 .

Arrowhead ECD Prop. v. ZHB W. Pikeland Twp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2024

PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ARROWHEAD ECD PROPERTIES, LLC : No. 464 MAL 2023 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth : Court ZONING HEARING BOARD

Snyder v. Erwin

229 Pa. 644 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1911

Allshouse v. … Dean v.

Holmes v. Paul

3 Grant 299 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1860

It has been repeatedly- decided by this court, and in two cases at this term (Dornan v. The Miners' Life Insurance Company and Moore v. … Paul was "a member of the Union Canal Company’s board of directors was a fact that did not lead him individually to perform their contracts as a corporation, much less was he bound to know that the company would not fulfil