Case law

In Re: Phila. Traffic Court Judge Christine Solomon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2014

JUSTICE SAYLOR FILED: December 19, 2014 I join the per curiam order deferring to the Judicial Conduct Board. I agree with Mr. … (“We have confidence that the standardized procedure of Article V, Section 18 [of the Pennsylvania Constitution] will, in the vast majority of circumstances, adequately respond to . . . the necessities of protecting the

Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.

473 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1977

Realty, Inc. v. … Dunson v. Erie Ins.

New Castle City v. Withers

291 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1927

We said, speaking of the act in question, in Beltz v. … In Com. v.

Workingman's Loan & Building Ass'n v. Heaton

233 Pa. 173 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1911

Crum Lynne Iron & Steel Co., 208 Pa. 462 ; Gaynor v. Railroad Co., 189 Pa. 5 ; Allegheny County Work House v. Moore, 95 Pa. 408 ; Stoystown & Greensburg Turnpike Road Co. v. Craver, 45 Pa. 386 ; Curry v. … See Lynn v. Bldg. & Loan Assn., 117 Pa. 1 .

In Re: Phila. Traffic Court Judge Christine Solomon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2014

JUSTICE SAYLOR FILED: December 19, 2014 I join the per curiam order deferring to the Judicial Conduct Board. I agree with Mr. … (“We have confidence that the standardized procedure of Article V, Section 18 [of the Pennsylvania Constitution] will, in the vast majority of circumstances, adequately respond to . . . the necessities of protecting the

Gourley's Estate

238 Pa. 62 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1913

At the death of both my sisters the balance of moneys is to be paid to the Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions.” … “Wherever it *65 is necessary for the accomplishment of any object of the creator of a trust that the legal estate should remain in the trustee, then the trust is a special active one”: Rife v.

Iordio v. Director General of Railroads

270 Pa. 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1921

This rule was applied in Campbell v. … injury by jumping from tbe car to tbe track in front of tbe oncoming cars and escaping to one side or tbe other: Diehl v.

Phillips v. Hall

160 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1894

The small return thus produced by the investment of part of her separate estate, etc., in keeping a boarding house, belonged to hei’self and not to her husba-ud; and his creditors have no claim upon it. In Silveus v. … To the same effect are numerous other cases, among which are Wieman v. Anderson, 42 Pa. 311 ; Sixbee v. Bowen, 91 Pa. 149 ; Welch v. Kline, 57 Pa. 432 ; Wayne v. Lewis, 23 W. N. 441; Seeds v.

Shankland's Appeal

47 Pa. 113 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1864

We have so lately gone over the list of cases beginning with Fisher v. Taylor, 2 Rawle 33 , and ending with Brown v. … This contract seems to have proceeded on the ground that Kuhn v. Newman destroyed this trust, and placed an unlimited life estate in the cestui que trust, discharged of all restrictions.

Samoskie v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.

280 Pa. 203 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1924

The compensation board upheld a finding of the referee in favor of claimant; on appeal, however, the common pleas sustained exceptions and remitted the record for further hearing. … This testimony was held insufficient under the rule laid down in Kelly v. Western Coal Co., 272 Pa. 39 , and Balch v. Budd Mfg.

Friedley v. Hamilton

17 Serg. & Rawle 70 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 26, 1827

In Simon v. Brown, ( 3 Yeates, 186 ,) and Heister v. … Kelleran v. Brown, ( 4 Mass. 445 .) Now, we have ho such statute in Pennsylvania, and the very fact of their existence in New York and.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

966 A.2d 568 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2009

966 A.2d 568 (2009) OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Arthur Louis BLOOM, Respondent. No. 1409 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. No. 177 DB 2006. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 3, 2009. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

72 Pa. D. & C.4th 98 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2004

V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent, Floyd Paul Jones, be disbarred from the practice of law. … Board Member Nordenberg did not participate in the September 27, 2004 adjudication.

Commonwealth v. Sullens

533 Pa. 99 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1992

Government of Virgin Islands v. Brown, 507 F.2d 186, 189-90 (3d Cir.1975). … Crews, 695 F.2d 519 (11th Cir.1983); Government of Virgin Islands v. Brown, supra; United States v. Sanchez, 790 F.2d 245 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 989 , 107 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed.2d 587 (1986); State v.

Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

: Unemployment Compensation Board of : Review at No. … Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268, 292, 126 S. Ct. 1752, 1767 (2006) (explaining that “agency adjudications typically warrant deference”); accord ARIPPA v. PUC, 792 A.2d 636, 660 (Pa.

Sharpsville Furnace Co. v. Snyder

223 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1909

In Winslow, Lanier & Co. v. … The same case was again in this court, Leonard’s Exrs. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Renfroe

886 A.2d 664 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2005

886 A.2d 664 (2005) OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Patricia M. RENFROE, a/k/a Patty M. Renfroe and Patty Michelle Renfroe, Respondent. No. 1066 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Harris v. Rendell

992 A.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2010

Com. v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.

951 A.2d 265 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2008

951 A.2d 265 (2008) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, Philip Morris, USA, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, B.A.T.

Woodson v. UNEMPLOY. COMP. BD. OF REV.

461 Pa. 439 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1975

461 Pa. 439 (1975) 336 A.2d 867 Gary WOODSON, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee. Lewis WOODSON, Appellant, v. … See Woodson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 7 Pa.Cmwlth. 526 , 300 A.2d 299 (1973).