Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

  • 966 A.2d 568
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 23, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Castille, C.J., Saylor, Eakin, Todd, McCaffery and Greenspan
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

966 A.2d 568 (2009)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner

v.

Arthur Louis BLOOM, Respondent.

No. 1409 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. No. 177 DB 2006.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 3, 2009.

Decided March 23, 2009.

Susan Nicol Dobbins, Esq., Disciplinary Bd. of Supreme Court of PA, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel, petitioner.

John E. Quinn, Esq., Portnoy & Quinn, L.L.C., Pittsburgh, for Arthur Louis Bloom, respondent.

*569 BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, TODD, McCAFFERY and GREENSPAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 14, 2008, and following oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arthur Louis Bloom be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.