Case law

Pierce v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

358 Pa. 403 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1948

The burden of.proof was on the plaintiff who did not produce sufficient evidence on the: subject: compare DeReeder v. Traveler’s Insurance Co., 329 Pa. 328, 333 , 198 A. 45 ; Stauffer v. Rwy. … The evidence is that when she boarded the train at Binghamton she wus assisted by ¡the trainman , at .the car which .she, boarded, and .by a soldier. * She ¡did not *406 advise tbe trainman wbo put ber valise “right at the

Sexauer v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

305 Pa. 319 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1931

One of them named Magee drove the truck to the corner of Wood-lawn Avenue and Forbes Street where it was boarded by the other five. … See Robinson v. American Ice Co., 292 Pa. 366 ; Hull v. Bowers, 273 Pa. 429 ; McClung v. Penna. T. Cab Co., 252 Pa. 479 ; Lattieri v. Blaisden, 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 423 .

Sicilia, V. v. API Roofers Adv. Program (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 2023

The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are: (1) Did the Commonwealth Court impermissibly expand the holdings in Duffey v. … (2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in reversing the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board by substituting [its] assessment of the credible testimony for that of the fact finder?

Kleinbard, LLC v. Lanc. Co. DA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2023

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … (2) Did the lower courts misconstrue Yost v McKnight, 865 A.2d 979 (Pa.

Commonwealth v. DePalma

268 Pa. 25 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1920

Before retiring he requested his boarding mistress to call him at six o’clock. … The test laid down by this court in Com. v. Eagan, 190 Pa. 10 , and followed in Com. v.

In Re: Estate of W. Herold; Apl of: Univ of Pgh.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2025

. § 1403; Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 532 A.2d 374 (Pa. 1987). … Sporio v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Songer Construction), 717 A.2d 525, 528 (Pa. 1998); see also Lancaster General Hospital v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Weber–Brown), 47 A.3d 831, 839 (Pa. 2012).

ODC v. Andrew Wilson Barbin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2455 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 176 DB 2017 : v … It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

ALBERT v. LEHIGH C. & N. CO.

431 Pa. 600 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1968

Lehigh's claim of title is based upon the 1867 deed of Brown to Lehigh. … See also: Montgomery v. Meredith, 17 Pa. 42 (1851); Brown v. Hays, 66 Pa. 229 (1871); Nypen Corp. v. Sechrist, 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 361, 364 , 10 A. 2d 822 (1940); Bozitsko v.

Ladner v. Siegel

294 Pa. 368 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1928

Lancaster Co., 290 Pa. 448 ; Sloan v. Longcope, 288 Pa. 196 ; Devlin’s Est., 284 Pa. 11 ; Girard Trust Co. v. Motor Co., 291 Pa. 507 ; Brown’s Est., 289 Pa. 101 . … situations (Tanner v.

Cosmark v. Struthers Wells Corp.

412 Pa. 211 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1963

In Smith v. … Ct. 519 ; Local 174 v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U.S. 95 , 82 S. Ct. 571 ; Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238 , 82 S. Ct. 1318 ; Smith v. Evening News Association, 371 U.S. 195 , 83 S.

Southeastern Reprographics, Inc. v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs

169 A.3d 1023 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2016

Hanhauser v. Pennsylvania & New England Railroad

222 Pa. 240 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1908

Justice Brown, The judgment which the court below refused to open was against five terre-tenants, to whose rights, franchises, property and assets the appellant succeeded. … Tozier, 154 Pa. 410 ; Hall v. West Chester Publishing Company, 180 Pa. 561 ; Lawrence v. Smith, 215 Pa. 534 . The appellee demurred to it on eight grounds.

Bedford Springs Co. v. McMeen

161 Pa. 639 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 1894

In Updegraff v. … It was a proceeding to test the title of the whole board and turned upon the validity of their election.

Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

: Unemployment Compensation Board of : Review at No. … Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. v. Ahlborn, 547 U.S. 268, 292, 126 S. Ct. 1752, 1767 (2006) (explaining that “agency adjudications typically warrant deference”); accord ARIPPA v. PUC, 792 A.2d 636, 660 (Pa.

Black Pol. Emp. v. Schmidt, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2024

WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, : SUBMITTED: September 4, 2024 AND COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA : : : v … Chief Justice Todd and Justice Donohue join this dissenting statement. 2 42 Pa.C.S. § 502 (setting forth this Court’s King’s Bench authority); Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Roux

465 Pa. 482 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1976

When Martinez left the bar he was followed, shortly thereafter, by Roux, Mc-Clendon, Pennington, West and Brown. … Roux relies upon Commonwealth v.

In re Hall

46 Pa. D. & C.5th 353 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2015

Office of Disciplinary Counsel *365 v. Keller, supra. … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that petitioner, Robert Eric Hall, be reinstated to the practice of law.

Commonwealth v. Sisak

436 Pa. 262 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1969

Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 12 , 175 Atl. 748 (1934); Commonwealth v. Kayfield, 40 Pa. D. & C. 2d 689 (Q.S. … See, e.g.: Commonwealth v. Williams, 432 Pa. 557 , 248 A. 2d 301 (1968); Segriff v. Johnston, 402 Pa. 109 , 166 A. 2d 496 (1960).

Thomas v. Borden

222 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1908

Justice Brown, That there may be an end to these proceedings and that the appellant may know his bill was properly dismissed, we have concluded not to quash his appeal, though there are good reasons for doing so. … The answer is further responsive because it states the particulars of the transaction charged and inquired into by the bill: Eaton’s Appeal, 66 Pa. 483 ; Merritt v. Brown, 19 N. J. Eq. 286.

Lower Merion Township v. Frankel

358 Pa. 430 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1948

The legal questions raised are (1) whether an objector’s appeal to the local board of adjustment (under Sec. 3107 of the First Class Township Law of June 24, 1931, P. … Nectow v. City of Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183, 188-189 ; Taylor v. Haverford Township, 299 Pa. 402, 415 , 149 A. 639 ; and White’s Appeal, 287 Pa. 259, 268-269 , 134 A. 409 .