Opinion

Black Pol. Emp. v. Schmidt, A.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Status
Published
On the bench
Wecht, David N.
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 30.6%

discussing this Court’s authority to sua sponte exercise King’s Bench jurisdiction

How later courts described this case

  • discussing this Court’s authority to sua sponte exercise King’s Bench jurisdiction

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

[J-79-2024]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT : No. 68 MAP 2024

PROJECT, POWER INTERFAITH, MAKE :

THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA, ONEPA : Appeal from the Order of the

ACTIVISTS UNITED, NEW PA PROJECT : Commonwealth Court at No. 283

EDUCATION FUND, CASA SAN JOSÉ, : MD 2024 dated August 30, 2024.

PITTSBURGH UNITED, LEAGUE OF :

WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, : SUBMITTED: September 4, 2024

AND COMMON CAUSE PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

v. :

:

:

AL SCHMIDT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY :

AS SECRETARY OF THE :

COMMONWEALTH, PHILADELPHIA :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, AND :

ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS :

:

:

APPEAL OF: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF :

PENNSYLVANIA AND REPUBLICAN :

NATIONAL COMMITTEE :

DISSENTING STATEMENT

JUSTICE WECHT Decided: September 13, 2024

I respectfully dissent from today’s Order vacating the Commonwealth Court’s

decision below, which held that strict enforcement of the Election Code’s requirement that

electors write the date on the envelope of their absentee or mail-in ballot violates the Free

and Equal Elections clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 1 A prompt and definitive

ruling on the constitutional question presented in this appeal is of paramount public

1 See PA. CONST. art. I, § 5.

importance inasmuch as it will affect the counting of ballots in the upcoming general

election. Therefore, I would exercise this Court’s King Bench authority over the instant

dispute and order that the matter be submitted on the briefs. 2

I respectfully dissent.

Chief Justice Todd and Justice Donohue join this dissenting statement.

2 42 Pa.C.S. § 502 (setting forth this Court’s King’s Bench authority);

Commonwealth v. Chimenti, 507 A.2d 79 (Pa. 1986) (discussing this Court’s authority to

sua sponte exercise King’s Bench jurisdiction).

[J-79-2024, 68 MAP 2024] - 2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.