Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.14s
120 Pa. 579 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 1887
Co. v. Pillow, 76 Pa. 510 . … In the case cited, a drunken row occurred on board one of the defendant’s cars, and during the quarrel a bottle was broken, and a piece of the glass struck the plaintiff, a peaceable passenger, in the eye and put it out;
Cited 33 timesPublished356 Pa. 54 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1946
On November 23, 1944, the minor and his employer, the defendant, entered into a written compensation agreement (later amended), approved by the minor’s parents and their counsel and by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … Parents are next of kin: Pettigrew v. Pettigrew, 207 Pa. 313, 319 , 56 A. 878 . The rights of parents rise no higher than those of their children: Delaney v.
Cited 3 timesPublished393 Pa. 219 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1958
In United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, Local 411, C.I.O. v. … Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 332, 334, 335 , 88 L. Ed. 762, 766 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedPennsylvania State Police v. General Davis, Inc.
537 Pa. 319 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1994
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Board of Revision of Taxes, 372 Pa. 468 , 93 A.2d 679 (1953). … Prichard v. Williston Township School District, 394 Pa. 489 , 147 A.2d 380 (1959).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDowningtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd of Assmt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 2026
In Valley Forge Tower Apartments v. … See Clifton v.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Pa. D. & C.4th 177 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1988
In charges IV and V, the hearing committee found no violations of the disciplinary rules. … DISCUSSION The board agrees with the hearing committee’s disposition of the five charges. Misconduct was shown on charges I through III. No misconduct was proven relating to charges IV and V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAttorney T. v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
519 Pa. 280 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1988
McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 465 Pa. 104 , 848 A.2d 376 (1975). … (No. 81 DB 87, Disciplinary Counsel v. Attorney T.). .
Cited 4 timesPublishedLight of Life Ministries, Inc. v. Cross Creek Township
560 Pa. 462 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2000
Light of Life appealed to the township’s zoning hearing board, which denied the appeal. Light of Life then appealed to the common pleas court. … Upper Salford Township v. Collins, 542 Pa. 608 , 669 A.2d 335, 336 (1995). Furthermore, “zoning ordinances are to be construed in accordance with the plain and ordinary meaning of their words.” Id. at 337.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCommonwealth ex rel. v. Taylor
159 Pa. 451 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1894
Constitutionally therefore it may contain anything that is germane to the subject of that act: Millvale v. R. W. Co., 131 Pa. 1 ; Phila. v. R. W. Co., 142 Pa. 484 . … Smathers v. Taylor, opinion filed herewith, it must fall with the reversal of that judgment. Injunction dissolved and bill dismissed with costs.
Cited 18 timesPublishedDowney v. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank
13 Serg. & Rawle 288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1825
Brown v. Warton, 4 Com. Dig. Action, K. 4. *290 The same principles may be collected from the case of M‘Fall v. Williams, in this court. 2 Serg. & Rawle, 288 .
Cited 7 timesPublished3 Watts & Serg. 272 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842
It was said, in Brown v. Sutter, ( 1 Dall. 239 ), that a judgment will not be opened to let in the statute of limitations; but as the plea of that statute has since been considered, in Shock v. … M’Chesney, ( 4 Yeates 507 ), and The Bank v. Israel, ( 6 Serg. & Rawle 294 ), to be no longer i an unconscionable one, the rule of practice would scarce be held so now.
Cited 1 timesPublished221 Pa. 131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1908
Justice Brown, Cornelius C. Y. Crawford died August 16, 1905, intestate, and without issue, leaving a widow and collateral heirs. … To the same effect is Overdeer v. Updegraff, 69 Pa. 110 ; De Haven’s App., 106 Pa. 612 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedColonial Trust Co. Tr. v. L. D. A. Corp. K. W. Moore
299 Pa. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1929
Consolidated Rubber Co., 284 Pa. 444 ; Schmidt & Friday’s Appeal, 82 Pa. 524 ; Faulkner et al. v. Wilson (Pa.), 3 W. N. C. 339; Brown v. Brown, *123 8 Pa. Dist. R. 365; Washburn v. … And see Horner v. Scott, 242 Pa. 432 ; Coyne et al. v. Souther, 61 Pa. 455 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedJ.S. v. Manheim Twp. SD, Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021
Commonwealth Court dated May 13, : 2020 at No. 341 CD 2019 Affirming : the Order of the Lancaster County v … The majority contends disagreement between the School District and SBA regarding the subpoena power of school boards militates against resolving the due process question in the present appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublished396 Pa. 592 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1959
In Rand v. … The error of the jurisdictional ruling in Philadelphia County Election Board v. Rader, supra, is patent. Henceforth that decision must be considered as overruled.
Cited 87 timesPublishedGulnac v. South Butler County School District
526 Pa. 483 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1991
The South Butler County School District Board of School Directors, at no time, sought an injunction restraining the work stoppage. … Inc. v. O’Malley, 108 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 528 A.2d 716 (1987); Pa. Independent Petroleum Producers v.
Cited 76 timesPublishedWilkes Sportswear, Inc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
380 Pa. 164 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1955
National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, 306 U. S. 601 ), which makes it unnecessary to discuss the facts justifying such mutual understanding. … In Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111, United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U.
Cited 13 timesPublishedSCRANTON BD. OF ZONING APPEALS v. Silas
393 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1958
393 Pa. 10 (1958) Scranton Board of Zoning Appeals, Appellant, v. Silas. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 1, 1958. May 26, 1958. *11 Before JONES, C.J., MUSMANNO, ARNOLD, JONES and COHEN, JJ. James K. … The Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Euclid Village v.
Cited 3 timesPublished4 Whart. 68 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1839
In Green v. … Cooker v. Child, (2 Lev. 74; S. C. 3 Keb. 94.115.) Lowther v. Kelly, (8 Mod. 115.) Lucke v. Lucke, (Lutw. 93; Nels. fol. ed.) Clement v. Henley, (2 Roll. Abr. 22; Faits (F.) pl. 2.)
Cited 14 timesPublishedMartin Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp., Aplts.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2024
TAMMI IAMS : : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered April v … COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS : : ARGUED: April 10, 2024 : APPEAL OF: DONEGAL TOWNSHIP,
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna