Case law

Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

472 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1977

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals and Review, 461 Pa. 716, 728-29 , 337 A.2d *538 844, 850 (1975). … American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals and Review, 461 Pa. at 726 , 337 A.2d at 849 .

ODC v. Andrew Wilson Barbin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 2018

OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2455 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 176 DB 2017 : v … October, 2018, a Rule having been entered by this Court pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(h), directing Respondent to show cause why the stayed suspension order of this Court should not be modified as set forth by the Designated Board

Monongahela Navigation Co. v. Advance Coal Co.

194 Pa. 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1899

Justice Brown, The sole question involved in this appeal has been considered and passed upon in the case of Monongahela Navigation Company v. John A. Wood and Samuel L. Wood, doing business as John A.

Angier v. Angier

63 Pa. 450 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1870

Of this character are the cases of Eshbach v. Eshbach, 11 Harris 343; Groves’s Appeal, 1 Wright 443 , and Gordon v. *460 Gordon, 12 Id. 226. Here the libellant left without any cause or reason, as disclosed to his wife. … In Bishop v.

Masloff v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.

531 Pa. 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1992

Duff v. Keenan, 347 Pa. 574 , 33 A.2d 244 (1943). Article 1, Section 11 can be invoked only with respect to a legal injury. Jackman v. … In Armstrong Education Association v.

Township of Eldred v. County of Monroe

330 Pa. Super. 74 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1984

. § 704(a); Pa.R.A.P. 741(a); see Jost v. Phoenixville Area School District, 267 Pa.Super. 461 , 465 n. 1, 406 A.2d 1133 , 1135 n. 1 (1979); see also Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Sensi, 287 Pa.Super. 452 at 454 , 430 A.2d 691 at 692 (1981). It is also true here that: As in Commonwealth v.

Manzetti v. Mercy Hosp. of Pittsburgh

565 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2001

Austin v. McNamara, 979 F.2d 728, 734 (9th Cir.1992). … Bernards Regional Medical Center (“St.Bernards”) in Arkansas; the other was sent to the Arkansas State Medical Board (“Arkansas Board”).

Stryjewski v. Local Union No. 830

426 Pa. 512 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1967

Labor Relations Board v. Butz, 411 Pa. 360, 365-370 , 192 A. 2d 707 (1963). … Rather, we believe that the party seeking relief need only demonstrate, on the basis of published regulations and decisions of the board, that the case is one which the board will decline to hear.” 10 We believe that, until

Miller Estate

380 Pa. 172 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1955

Miller (Items Seven and Eight supra) were incorporated by reference in the will of George Barron Miller (see Clark v. … In the case of The City of Philadelphia, v.

Monongahela Navigation Co. v. Tide Coal Co.

194 Pa. 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1899

Justice Brown, The sole question involved in this appeal has been considered and passed upon in the case of Monongahela Navigation Company v. John A. Wood and Samuel L. Wood, doing business as John A.

Underwood v. Pennsylvania, Monongahela & Southern Railroad

255 Pa. 553 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1917

Co. v. Philadelphia & Erie R. R. Co., 141 Pa. 407 , down to the recent case of Johnston v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. … Co. v. Philadelphia & Erie R. R. Co., supra; Johnston v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., supra.

In re Anonymous No. 60 D.B. 83

39 Pa. D. & C.3d 175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1986

MCDONALD, Member, Pursuant to Rule 218(c)(5) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable … V. RECOMMENDATIONS The Disciplinary Board recommend^ to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as follows: 1. That petitioner, [ ], be readmitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2.

Shankey v. STAISEY

436 Pa. 65 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1969

In Kerns v. … As to the proper construction of the former, see Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County v. Superior Court, 4 Ariz.

Commonwealth v. After Six, Inc.

489 Pa. 69 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1980

Commonwealth v. … Determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue. “(i) Exceptions.

Liquor Cont. Bd. v. Ind. S. Stores U.

520 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1989

Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Independent State Stores Union, 100 Pa.Cmwlth. 272 , 514 A.2d 959 (1986). … Unlike in County of Centre, Centre County Prison Board v. Musser, 519 Pa. 380 , 548 A.2d 1194 (1988) and Philadelphia Housing Authority v.

McFarland v. Schultz

168 Pa. 634 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 1895

If authority for the foregoing views is needed it will be found in Russell v. Bell, supra; Lee v. Burke, 66 Pa. 336 ; Fahnestock v. Speer, 92 Pa. 146 ; Brown v. Myers, 145 Pa. 17 . … He contends that it was and, as sustaining his contention, cites: Chapel v. Baer, 3 Penny. 530 .

Gen. Motors, LLC v. Bureau of Prof'l & Occupational Affairs

186 A.3d 937 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 2018

MIDDLE DISTRICT GENERAL MOTORS, LLC : No. 778 MAL 2017 : : v … (2) Did the Commonwealth Court err by failing to give proper deference to the Board’s decision interpreting the Act?

Atherholt v. William Stoddart Co.

286 Pa. 278 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1926

As was said in Tarr v. … Excelsior Express Co., 259 Pa. 393 ; Crouse v. Lubin, 260 Pa. 329, 332 ; Cayll v. Gas & Elec. Co., supra, 179 N. W. 773 .

ODC v. Barry O. Bohmueller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2015

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2039 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 53 DB 2011 v … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. Mr. Chief Justice Saylor, Madame Justice Todd, and Mr.

Pennsylvania State Police v. Hospitality Investments of Philadelphia, Inc.

547 Pa. 142 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1997

(Hospitality), is the holder of a restaurant liquor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor *144 Control Board (Board), and is a retailer licensee. … Commonwealth v. Edmunds, 526 Pa. 374 , 586 A.2d 887 (1991).