Case law

Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. Commonwealth

496 Pa. 315 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1981

Ill, §§ 24, 31; Franklin County Prison Board v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 491 Pa. 50 , 417 A.2d 1138 (1980). … Commonwealth v. Young, 456 Pa. 102, 115 , 317 A.2d 258, 264 (1974); McCaffrey v. Pittsburgh Athletic Association, 448 Pa. 151, 162 , 293 A.2d 51, 57 (1972). .

Kennedy v. Pittsburgh

230 Pa. 244 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1911

Justice Brown, If the plaintiff succeeded in showing that the defendant was guilty of negligence, she at the same time most clearly established her own as a contributing cause of the injuries she sustained. … Under Shall-cross v. Phila., 187 Pa. 143 ; Kennedy v. Phila., 220 Pa. 273 , and kindred cases, defendant’s point should have been affirmed.

Appeal of Kartorie

486 Pa. 500 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 1979

The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners denied the application because Ms. … A state board of bar examiners could hardly perform this important function.

Wells v. Frutchey

274 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1922

Justice Kephart, This is an appeal from the confirmation by the court below of an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … This finding is conclusive on us, as the claim arose prior to the Act of 1919: McCauley v. Imperial W. Co., 261 Pa. 312, 329 ; McCarl v. Houston Boro., 263 Pa. 1, 2 ; Catlin v.

In re Anonymous No. 75 D.B. 92

27 Pa. D. & C.4th 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1995

The matter was adjudicated by the board on October 21, 1994. II. … Finally, the board also notes that the Office of Disciplinary Counsel did not oppose petitioner’s reinstatement. Therefore, as a result of all evidence before us, the board recommends that petitioner be reinstated. V.

Kleinbard, LLC, Aplt. v. Lancaster Co. DA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2024

Attorney must obtain authorization from the Board, which Stedman never sought. … Id. at 13-14. 12 Kleinbard LLC v. Office of District Attorney of Lancaster Cnty., 2023 WL 3065855, at *4 (Pa. Cmwlth.

In re Anonymous No. 90 D.B. 99

60 Pa. D. & C.4th 439 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 2000

The board recommends that this suspension be made concurrent to the suspension imposed in the matter at nos. 5 D.B. 99 and 24 D.B. 99 on March 16,2000. V. … Board Member Scaricamazza did not participate in the February 2, 2000 adjudication.

Hood v. Norton

202 Pa. 120 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1902

Justice Brown, The questions raised on this appeal have been considered and passed upon in the case of Hood to the use of McCloskey v. Albert E.

Spagnol v. Pennsylvania R. R.

279 Pa. 205 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1924

the cars: MacGiloray v. … Superior Ct. 524 ); nor for the negligent or wilful act of another, unless given an opportunity to prevent it: Widener v. P. R. T. Co., 224 Pa. 171 ; Kantner v. P. & R. Ry. Co., 236 Pa. 283 ; Wood v. P. R. T.

Leonard v. Duffin

94 Pa. 218 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 1880

It has been held to be a sufficient consideration to support the promise of the wife herself made after her coverture has ceased and she had become sui juris: Brown v. Bennett, 25 P. F. Smith 420; Trout v. … Thus, if she execute a note jointly with her husband she may not be bound, yet he shall be bound for the whole: Unangst v. Fitler, 3 Norris 135; Hope Building Association v. Lance, 6 W. N. C. 219.

In re Anonymous No. 32 D.B. 77

9 Pa. D. & C.3d 451 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1978

and was informed that the board chairman would not allow any continuance. … Respondent was retained to represent [C] and his mother and father and to present a defense in their behalf in the matter of [¶] v. C] of 1972 in the Court of Common Pleas of [ ] County.

Stern Mfg. Co. v. Geo. W. Smith & Co.

273 Pa. 39 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1922

A verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff and, upon refusal of the court below to either grant a new trial or enter judgment n. o. v., defendant appealed. … In Hamilton v. Brown, 18 Pa. 87, 89 , we said: “An assignee need show no right in himself; it is enough if he show a right in the legal plaintiff, for it is the right alone that can be enforced.” In Howes v.

ODC v. Donald B. Corriere

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2015

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2172 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 182 DB 2014 v … Respondent shall pay costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

Diehl v. the Adams County Mutual Insurance

58 Pa. 443 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1868

Co. v. Stewart, 7 Harris 45, and The Mutual Protection Co. v. Schell, 5 Casey 31, cited, are not. … One of the first decisions under that act by this court, was Austin v.

Clark v. Monongahela Navigation Co.

10 Watts 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1840

Co. v. Henderson, 8 Serg. & Rawle 219 , recognized in subsequent cases, the contract of subscription is void. … of managers of the company, in organizing and conducting the affairs of the same, so far as the said defect or irregularity may have proceeded from the neglect or omission of the said commissioners and board of managers,

Broussard v. ZON. BD. OF ADJ. OF PITTSBURGH

907 A.2d 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2006

Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 368 Pa. 463, 471 , 84 A.2d 495, 499 (1951) (citing, inter alia, Logan v. Davis, 233 U.S. 613, 627 , 34 S.Ct. 685, 690 , 58 L.Ed. 1121 (1914)); see Willits Woods Assocs. v. … Lower Merion Township v.

AMP Products Corp. v. Commonwealth

530 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1992

Commonwealth v. Butts

495 Pa. 528 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1981

At 4:30 a.m., Janice Brown and Diane Newsome left the party. Soon thereafter they encountered appellant and his confederate sitting in a bluish green car. … Commonwealth v. Linkowski, 363 Pa. 420, 424 , 70 A.2d 278, 280 (1950).

Lauderbaugh v. Williams

409 Pa. 351 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1962

The pertinent portions of the by-laws of the Lake Watawga Association provide as follows: “Article V. Membership. Section 1. … An Investigation Committee composed of three members of the Board of Directors shall be appointed by the President of the Board, which Committee shall report its findings to the Board of Directors before the application is

Hughey v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

191 A.3d 741 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2018