Opinion

Hood v. Norton

  • 202 Pa. 120
  • 51 A. 1111
  • 1902 Pa. LEXIS 477
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 24, 1902
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mestbezat, Mitchell, Potteb
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The questions raised on this appeal have been considered and passed upon in the case of Hood to the use of McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton et al., January term, 1901, No. 111, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.