Case law

Helsel v. RODGERS

440 Pa. 516 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1970

This attempt was unsuccessful, and the board expired on December 15, 1968. … Siranovich v. Butkovich, 359 Pa. 134 , 58 A. 2d 461 (1948); Hanna v. Chester Times, 310 Pa. 583 , 166 Atl. 243 (1933); Cella v. Davidson, 304 Pa. 389 , 156 Atl. 99 (1931); Deal v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kissel

497 Pa. 467 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1982

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (hereinafter “Board”) recommended that respondent, Douglas J. … Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194 , 425 A.2d 730 (1981) (citations omitted).

Young v. Mathews Trucking Corp.

383 Pa. 464 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1956

This was error: Hamborsky v. Magyar Presbyterian Church (No.1), 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 519 . See also Nixon v. Nixon, 329 Pa. 256, 263 , 198 A. 154 . … Brown-Murray Co., Inc., 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 239, 244 , 193 A. 381 . See also Britton v. Continental Mining and Smelting Corporation, 366 Pa. 82, 84 , 76 A. 2d 625 .

In re Anonymous No. 72 D.B. 93

48 Pa. D. & C.4th 100 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1999

by the board at the meeting of March 10, 1999. … V.

Ochoa, M. v. Levine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 2023

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v … ARTHUR LEVINE; UNIVERSITY OF : PITTSBURGH BOARD OF TRUSTEES; : UPMC BOARD OF DIRECTORS; DAVID S. : POLLOCK, BRIAN C. VERTZ; BENJAMIN : E. ORSATTI; POLLOCK BEGG KOMAR : GLASSER VERTZ LLC; DR.

DiPietrae v. City of Philadelphia

543 Pa. 591 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1996

Finan v. Sutch

220 Pa. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1908

The fact is that there was a knot in the board which was hidden by the mortar so that it could not be seen. This *381 weakened the board to such an extent that it gave way under the weight of appellant. … This case in all important particulars is ruled by Ross v.

Williams v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

255 Pa. 133 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1916

Co. v. Keating & Smethport R. R. Co., 233 Pa. 71 . In Tibby Bros. Glass Co. v. Penna. R. R. … In Marlor v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Balto. R. R., 166 Pa. 524 , and Dryden v. Pittsburgh, Virginia & Charleston Ry.

In re Condemnation By The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission of 14.38 Acres In Fee Simple

548 Pa. 433 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1997

See also Redevelopment Auth. of Washington v. Sepesy, 107 Pa. … See also Amoco Oil Co. v. Dep’t of Transportation, Pa.

ODC v. Ivan Stewart DeVoren

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2021

: No. 2620 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 103 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Stickles v. Oviatt

212 Pa. 219 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1905

In Ihmsen v. Ormsby, 32 Pa. 198 , Mr. … In Everhart v.

Smith, D. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2016

Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v … The issue, as stated by petitioner, is: Does the Commonwealth Court’s decision conflict with this Court’s decision in Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole?

Lebanon Valley Farmers Bank v. Commonwealth

623 Pa. 455 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2013

The Board of Appeals rejected the claim, and LVFB appealed to the Board of Finance and Revenue. Relying on First Union, the Board also denied the appeal. … Clifton v. Allegheny County, 600 Pa. 662 , 969 A.2d 1197, 1210 (2009) (citing Leonard v.

In Re Interest of Forrester

575 Pa. 365 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2003

Buffalo Twp. v. Jones, 571 Pa. 637 , 813 A.2d 659 , 664 n. 4 (2002). … Balent v. City of Wilkes-Barre, 542 Pa. 555 , 669 A.2d 309, 314 (1995).

Snyder v. Baer

282 Pa. 291 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1925

v. … Unger, 269 Pa. 471, 472 ; Mancia v. Marquette N.

In Re Verlin

557 Pa. 47 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1999

The Disciplinary Board thereafter issued a report recommending that Verlin’s petition for reinstatement be granted. … 1998, the Court issued a rule to show cause why an order denying Verlin’s petition for reinstatement should not be entered based on his failure to meet the threshold standard articulated in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Power

390 Pa. 206 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1957

Justice Cohen, In Bregman v. … The refusal of the Zoning Board of Adjustment to "grant .such, a variance did'not,-under the cir *212 eumstances of this case, constitute a manifest abuse of discretion. Walker v.

In the Matter of: Nathan Daniel Lyle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2378 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : Nos. 189 & 190 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

DEP Aplt v. PA Legislative Ref. Bureau

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2026

: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : Appeal from the Order of the INTERIM ACTING CHAIRPERSON OF : Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY : 2022 dated November 1, 2023 BOARD … : : ARGUED: May 13, 2025 Appellant : : : v

Marwitz's Estate

286 Pa. 191 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1926

Brown, 240 Pa. 328 ; First Nat. Bank v. Delone, 254 Pa. 409 ; Union Safe Dep. Bank v. Strauch, 20 Pa. Superior Ct. 196 ; 3 R. C. L. 1330. … Bank, 277 Pa. 401 ), and whether such diligence has been exercised, the facts being undisputed as here, is a question of law for the court: Smith v. Fisher, 24 Pa. 222; Haly v. Brown, 5 Pa. 178 ; Sherer v.