Case law

Commonwealth v. Evans

343 Pa. Super. 118 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1985

. *135 The Commonwealth cites the recent case of Commonwealth v. … However, the panel also noted in dicta that “in Commonwealth v.

Yocum v. Power

398 Pa. 223 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1960

In Shapiro v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 377 Pa. 621 , Julian B. … Aberman, Inc. v.

Capozzi, F. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, : : Respondent

In re: Canvass of Provis. Ballots Appeal of Walsh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2024

Brief for Appellee (Board) at 16 (quoting League of Women Voters v. Commonwealth, 178 A.d 737, 804 (Pa. 2018)). … Only then is the board permitted to count the ballot. See 25 P.S. § 3050(a.4)(5)(i). See generally Anderson v.

Commonwealth v. Graham

554 Pa. 472 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1998

Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 , (1983), the U.S. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 737 , 103 S.Ct. at 1541 (citing Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 465 , 91 S.Ct. 2022, 2037 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (plurality opinion)). See also Commonwealth v.

Pinkins, R., Pet v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2020

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … The Commonwealth Court erred when it affirmed the Parole Board’s decision to deny Petitioner credit for time spent at liberty on parole when the reason offered was unsupported by the record and/or

Williams v. Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Local No. 2

384 Pa. 413 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1956

There it was held that plaintiff members of defendant union were improperly convicted on appeal by the International Executive Board after acquittal by the Local trial board, and consequently were entitled to wages lost through … To the same effect are Williston on Contracts, Revised Edition, §1359; Restatement, Agency, §455, comment d; Martin v. Board of Education of Lincoln County, 120 W. Va. 621 , 199 S.E. 887 ; San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v.

Commonwealth v. Purvis

458 Pa. 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1974

The final interrogation session commenced at 7:30 P.M. by Detective Brown. … See Culombe v. Connecticut, supra at 602 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Butler v. Rundle, supra at 151 , 239 A.2d at 431 ; Commonwealth v. Eiland, supra at 574 , 301 A.2d at 654 ; Commonwealth v.

Dougherty's Appeal

321 Pa. 170 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1936

the year 1934 were certified to the Receiver of Taxes for collection on or about December 31st, 1933; that the appeals were dismissed because they were taken too.late; and that the Supreme Court in the case of Dougherty v. … “The admitted averments of the petition accompanying the rule to dismiss the appeal are fully substantiated by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Dougherty v.

In Re Franciscus

471 Pa. 53 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1977

Specter v. … Rule of Procedure Governing The Judicial Inquiry and Review Board 7.

In Re: Phila. Traffic Court Judge Christine Solomon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2014

, as mandated by Article V, Section 18(a)(8) (“All proceedings of the board shall be confidential except when the subject of the investigation waives confidentiality.”). … See Annenberg v.

Moore v. Luzerne County

262 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1918

Muckle, 198 Pa. 388 ; Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143 . … Since Western Savings Fund Society of Philadelphia v.

Shrom,T. v. PA Underground Storage Tank, Aplt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2023

The Board maintains that the Commonwealth Court’s prior decision in Bergey v. Foster, 604 A.2d 1209 (Pa. … Hosps., Inc. v. Pa.

Commonwealth v. Scutt

262 Pa. 154 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1918

director of the Dickson City Borough School District, and the circumstances under which he was unlawfully expelled from the said office, are fully set forth by us in an opinion recently handed down in the case of Moskovitz v. … The authorities cited by tbe learned judge, more particularly Commonwealth v.

Pittsburgh & Connelsville Railroad v. Clarke & Thaw

29 Pa. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1857

Rep. 579 ; Newton v. Bridgeport Turnpike Company, 3 Conn. Rep. 544 ; Oxford Turnpike Company v. Bunnell, 6 Conn. 552 . … So, where the assent of the board is required by a by-law only, the execution of the by-law may be modified by the practice of the corporation : Insurance Company v. Smith, 1 Jones 126 .

Hollinger v. Department of Public Welfare

469 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1976

National Labor Relations Board v. Injection Molding Co., 211 F.2d 59, 65 (8th Cir. 1954). … This case presents no problem of preemption by the federal government acting through the National Labor Relations Board. See San Diego Trades Council, etc. v.

Jacob, K. v. UCBR of: UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 2016

Compensation Board of : Review at No. … See Peak v.

Beaver, Bare & Co. v. Bare

104 Pa. 58 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 1883

Cyphert, 3 Casey 220; he may let them go fine from his service, whenever he chooses, no matter whether he be solvent or insolvent: Holdship v. Patterson, 7 Watts 547 ; Brown’s Appeal, 5 Norris 524. … In the case of Kauffelt v.

National Union Bank v. Shearer

225 Pa. 470 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1909

Justice Brown, The Act of September 24, 1866, P. … We have defined him to be “one who receives and stores goods as a business for a compensation or profit:” Bucher v. Com., 103 Pa. 528 ; Tradesmen’s Nat. Bank v. Jagode, 186 Pa. 556 .

Barth v. Philadelphia School District

393 Pa. 557 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1958

In Wilson et ux. v. Phila. … Harris v. Board of Public Education, 306 Pa. 546 , 160 A. 443 , relied upon by the City and the School *565 District, furnishes no basis or support for the present Agreement.