Opinion

Pinkins, R., Pet v. PBPP

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 4, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RICKI PINKINS, : No. 194 WAL 2020

:

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal

: from the Order of the

v. : Commonwealth Court

:

:

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION :

AND PAROLE, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

a. Is the language of a commutation a permissible basis for the Parole

Board to deviate from the presumptive recommitment ranges for a

convicted parole violator and to not establish a new minimum parole

eligibility date?

b. The Commonwealth Court erred when it affirmed the Parole Board’s

decision to deny Petitioner credit for time spent at liberty on parole

when the reason offered was unsupported by the record and/or

contrary to law.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.