Case law

MacDonald v. Feldman

393 Pa. 274 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1958

In Mische v. Kaminski, 127 Pa. … It has been held that unions may be held accountable in state courts for damages resulting from their tortious conduct: see United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp., 347 U.S. 656 (1954); Bens v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Bunch v. Beattie

364 Pa. 572 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1950

On June 1,1947, the board elected Vincent F. Bunch warden of the Cambria County Jail. … Justice Linn in Weiss v.

Smith v. Milligan

43 Pa. 107 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1862

For the boarding and necessaries furnished to a parent, the law implies no promise to pay. But this is an exceptional case. It springs from the intimate relationship of the parties: Lynn v. Lynn, 5 Casey 369. … He said he would not board at any place but the plaintiff’s — that he had enough to pay for his boarding. The tendency of this is to show that gratuitous service was not expected.

Tegzes v. Township of Bristol

504 Pa. 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1984

On that date the Board of Commissioners of the Township (hereafter Board) passed a resolution nominating him for the position of chief of police. … In Gardner v.

ODC, Pet v. Adam J. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016

: Petitioner : No. 215 DB 2015 : : Attorney Registration No. 64987 v … Respondent shall establish his weekly attendance at Narcotics or Alcoholics Anonymous meetings by providing written verification to the Board on a Board-approved form; 7.

Northampton County v. Yohe

24 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1855

If the annual board may reopen the accounts of two years past, they may on the same principle go back twenty, and the next board may upset their doings, and thus interminable confusion be introduced in place of the statutory … These views are not only grounded in the statute, but coincide with those adopted in the case of Northumberland County v. Bloom, 3 W. & Ser. 542.

Hunter v. American Steel & Wire Co.

293 Pa. 103 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1928

As has frequently been stated by this court, the findings of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, supported by evidence, have the weight of the verdict of a jury (Sgattone v. … The legislature has confided to *106 the compensation board and referees the exclusive function of determining what facts are established: Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163 .

Crouse, Inc. v. Braddock Borough School District

341 Pa. 497 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1941

on the part of the Board.” … The question before us is ruled by our decision in Chilli v. McKeesport School District, 334 Pa. 581 , 6 A. 2d 99 .

ODC v. Patrick Stephen Healy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2383 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 68 DB 2017 v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Schoch v. American International Corp.

286 Pa. 181 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1926

(Zeller v. American *188 International Corp., supra), it has uniformly been held that ejectment is the proper action in such case: Com. v. Cochran, 1 Binn. 323 ; Shoenburger v. Becht, 5 Watts 194 ; Wilson v. … L. 478) : Glenn v. Stewart, 265 Pa. 208 ; Shaw v. Cornman, 271 Pa. 260 ; Gailey v. Wilkinsburg Co., 283 Pa. 381 .

Adler v. Philadelphia

397 Pa. 660 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1959

The ordinance also directed the Board of Surveyors of the Department of Streets to strike so much of Appletree Street from the City Plan, the Board of Surveyors being empowered by City Council, acting under statutory authority … In Zerbe Township School District v. Thomas, 353 Pa. 162, 165 , 44 A. 2d 566 , Mr.

Schneider v. Philadelphia Quartz Co.

220 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1908

In answer to a question as to when the boards were removed he said: “ I say that on the days that the boards were there, I was all right, and that day when I started on two boards I was hurt.” … It is only necessary to cite Durst v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Waltman v. Graczyk

501 Pa. 244 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1983

Jones v. State Auto. Ins. Ass’n, *247 -Pa.Super.-, -, 455 A.2d 710, 713 (1983). However, there is no requirement that exceptions be filed after entry of final judgment. … The Authority Board seated Traverse and refused to seat Raudenbush.

Simmonds v. State Employees' Retirement System

548 Pa. 219 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 1997

The Commonwealth Court reversed, finding that the Board’s reliance on Einstein was misplaced. It held that pursuant to Kapilian v. … Christiana v. Public School Employes’ Retirement Board, 543 Pa. 132 , 669 A.2d 940 (1996).

Pittsburg v. Sterrett Subdistrict School

61 L.R.A. 183 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1903

Rep. 415 ; Board of Improvement v. School District, supra. … In Board of Improvement v.

Burns v. Johnstown Passenger Railway Co.

213 Pa. 143 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1906

A passenger who stands on the running board when there is room inside, or when it is reasonably practicable to go inside the car, assumes the risk of his position : Bard v. … Pennsylvania Traction Co., 176 Pa. 97 ; Thane v. Scranton Traction Co., 191 Pa. 249; Bumbear v. United Traction Co., 198 Pa. 198 .

In Re Petition of Dolington Land Group

576 Pa. 519 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2003

See Hudachek v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newtown Borough, 147 Pa.Cmwlth. 566 , 608 A.2d 652, 656 (1992), and Newtown Land Limited Partnership v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newtown Township, 30 Pa. … Nevertheless, such decisions as C & M Developers and Hopewell Township Board of Supervisors v.

Marcellus Shale Coal. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. of Pa.

185 A.3d 985 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2018

Lee, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Stormans, Inc. v.

Kelly v. Jones

419 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1965

In Lennox v. … In Jordan v.

Fiore v. COM. BD. OF FINANCE & REVENUE

534 Pa. 511 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1993

The three appeals were consolidated in the Commonwealth Court, which affirmed the three contested orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue. Fiore v. … and the Board of Finance and Revenue.