Case law

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Waltman v. Graczyk

501 Pa. 244 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1983

Jones v. State Auto. Ins. Ass’n, *247 -Pa.Super.-, -, 455 A.2d 710, 713 (1983). However, there is no requirement that exceptions be filed after entry of final judgment. … The Authority Board seated Traverse and refused to seat Raudenbush.

ODC v. Patrick Stephen Healy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2383 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : No. 68 DB 2017 v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Adler v. Philadelphia

397 Pa. 660 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1959

The ordinance also directed the Board of Surveyors of the Department of Streets to strike so much of Appletree Street from the City Plan, the Board of Surveyors being empowered by City Council, acting under statutory authority … In Zerbe Township School District v. Thomas, 353 Pa. 162, 165 , 44 A. 2d 566 , Mr.

Kusenko v. Republic Steel Corp.

506 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1984

.” *106 The referee’s award was affirmed by the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board). The Board based their decision on Crucible Steel Inc. v. … The Commonwealth Court affirmed, applying the standard it set forth in Evon v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 70 Pa.Cmwlth. 325 , 453 A.2d 55 (1982).

Western Saving Fund Society v. City of Philadelphia

31 Pa. 185 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

It is, perhaps, nowhere better stated than by Chief Justice Nelson, in Bailey v. The Mayor, &c., of the City of New York, 3 Hill 531 . … It may be well here to recur to the previous constitution of the board.

Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port Authority

417 Pa. 299 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965

National Transit Co. v. Boardman, 328 Pa. 450 , 197 Atl. 239 (1938); Kuzmen v. Kamien, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 12 A. 2d 471 (1940). … Tranter v.

Seiss v. McClintic-marshall Corp.

324 Pa. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1936

, the board itself had notice of the making of the agreement and impliedly ratified it. … There is very little here to show that the board had knowledge of the agreement. See also on the subject of necessary knowledge before ratification can be assumed: Pollock v.

Snowden v. Kittanning Ins.

122 Pa. 502 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1888

Co. v. Todd, 83 Pa. 272 ; Crawford Co. M. Ins. Co. v. Cochran, 88 Pa. 230 ; Farmers *510 Mutual Ins. Co. v. Moyer, 97 Pa. 441 . … Co. v. Taylor, 73 Pa. 343 ; State Ins. Co. v. Todd, supra. Was there any evidence of such a waiver of the preliminary proofs .in this case?

Commonwealth v. Browning, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2023

2022 : Respondent : : : v … : : : JAMES MERRILL BROWNING, :

Commonwealth ex rel. Lehman v. Sutherland

3 Serg. & Rawle 145 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1817

board of health. … This principle is established by the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, in The Commonwealth v. Fowler, 10 Mass.

Shuler v. Midvalley Coal Co.

296 Pa. 503 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1928

L. 665, 666, states, “Any party may appeal from any action of the board.” … In Kuca v.

Kapil v. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties

504 Pa. 92 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1983

See Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Altoona Area School District, 480 Pa. 148 , 389 A.2d 553 (1978); Hollinger v. … See, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Altoona Area School District, supra; Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School District, supra.

Emrick v. Bethlehem Township

506 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1984

Higbee Corporation v. Kenney, 286 Pa.Super. 101 , 428 A.2d 592 (1981) citing: Brown v. Haight, 435 Pa. 12 , 255 A.2d 508 (1969); Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 347 Pa. 290 , 32 A.2d 227 (1943); Stolarick v. … Second, a letter dated October 29, 1980 directed to the Bethlehem Township Board of Commissioners which set forth the appellants’ claim in the language of the deed.

Stimmler v. Chestnut Hill Hospital

596 Pa. 582 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2008

Curll v. Dairymen's Cooperative Sales Ass'n

389 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1957

Hood & Sons, Inc. et al. v. United States et al., 307 U. S. 588, 599 , 59 S. Ct. 1019, 1025 , stated: “Two cooperatives voted for their members in favor of the amendments to the Order. … Kelly v. Philadelphia, 382 Pa. 459 , 115 A. 2d 238 , and cases cited therein. Decree affirmed at cost of appellants.

ODC v. Elizabeth Ann Gray

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2016

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2210 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 55 DB 2016 : v … Respondent shall establish her weekly attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings by providing written verification to the Board on a Board-approved form; 7.

Ruehl v. Maxwell Steel Co., Inc.

327 Pa. Super. 39 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1984

Budd Building & Loan Association v. Kinsella, 102 Pa.Super. 248, 257 , 156 A. 577, 580 (1931); Stern & Co. v. Harrod, 90 Pa.Super. 327, 330 (1927); Dunn v. Brown, 89 Pa.Super. 370, 372 (1926); Wanamaker & Brown v. … Dunn v. Brown, supra. I.V.B.’s answers to Voest-Alpine’s interrogatories admitted that the account of Maxwell Steel had in it a collected balance of $7,026.77. This was the only amount then subject to attachment.

Helinek v. Helinek

337 Pa. Super. 497 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1985

Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 35 Pa.Cmwlth. 7, 11 , 384 A.2d 1017, 1019 (1978); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. DelCimmuto, 23 Pa.Cmwlth. 43, 45-46 , 350 A.2d 459, 460 (1976). See also: Plummer v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 21 Pa.Cmwlth. 437, 442 , 346 A.2d 379 , 382 *502 (1975). See also: Crouse v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 57 Pa.Cmwlth. 430, 435 , 426 A.2d 749, 751 (1981).” Hall v.

Toolan v. Trevose Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

501 Pa. 477 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1983

Pre-emption may be either express or implied, Jones v. … Appellants’ remedy if any, would lie in a complaint filed with the Board. See 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (d); Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings and Loan Association, 388 F.2d 609 (2d Cir.1967).

Browne, P., Aplt. v. Senate of Pa.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 2024

BROWNE, SECRETARY, : No. 83 MAP 2024 PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : REVENUE, : : … : Appellant : : : v