Case law

Commonwealth v. Smith, J., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2025

Smith’s Brief at 14 (citing Commonwealth v. Brown, 347 A.2d 716, 718 (Pa. 1975) overruled, in part, by Commonwealth v. Richardson, 474 A.2d 1361 (Pa. 1984); Commonwealth v. … Brown v. United States, 338 F.2d 543, 545 (D.C. Cir. 1964).

Kline Zoning Case

395 Pa. 122 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1959

Jones in Richman v. … In Gold v.

McConnell v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue

503 Pa. 322 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1983

Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company, 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734, 737 (1975), citing Wright, Class Actions, 47 F.R.D. 169 , 170 (1970), quoting Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 560 (2d Cir.1968). … See Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company, 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734 (1975). .

Koch Election Contest Case

353 Pa. 619 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1946

(Citing cases); in Luce v. Snively, Vol. … Vol. 4, sec. 1241(4). 5 Llewellin v. Mackworth, 2 Atk. 40; Villiers v. Villiers, ib, 71.

Hand's Case

266 Pa. 277 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1920

between the parties, and, therefore, the board was without jurisdiction in the premises. … without prejudice” import an agreement that existing rights shall not be affected by tbe payment, but “shall be as open to settlement by negotiation or legal controversy, as if tbe money bad not been turned over”: Genet v.

Trustees of the Philadelphia Museums v. Trustees of the University

251 Pa. 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1915

The status of the board is similar to that of the Carnegie Free Library Board in Laird v. … In the case of Attorney General v.

In re Judicial Conduct Board Subpoena No. 96076

550 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1997

Const., Article V, § 18(b)(5) (emphasis added). … Prior to that event, the board acts confidentially 2 and independently of the court. Pa. Const., Article V, § 18(a)(8).

Jefferson Memorial Park v. West Jefferson Hills School District

397 Pa. 629 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1959

In Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. … Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Tamaqua Borough School District, supra. See, also, Girard Trust Company v. Philadelphia, 359 Pa. 319 , 59 A. 2d 124 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of Philadelphia

176 Pa. 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1896

The duties of the controller as was held in Com. v. … The contract it is to be noted was made by the board of education for a matter clearly within their department.

Elliot v. Philadelphia

229 Pa. 215 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1910

If an owner feels aggrieved by the valuation of his property by the assessor, his proper course is to appeal to the board of revision and this applies to the correction of all errors: Phila. v. Thurlow, 39 W. N. C. 412. … L. 320, which gave the right of appeal from the board of revision to the court of common pleas, it was held that the appeal must be taken within the time prescribed by law or it would be too late: City v. Michener, 7 W.

Alloy Metal Wire Company, Inc., Appeal

329 Pa. 429 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1938

See Steel v. … See also Force’s Petition, 265 Pa. 228, 229 ; Spellman v. City of Scranton, 17 Pa. Super. Ct. 223, 224 ; Lapcevic v. Guardian Fire Ins. Co., 43 Pa. Super. Ct. 479 . Cf.

Harmon v. Mifflin County School District

552 Pa. 92 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1998

Blascovich v. Board of School Directors of Shamokin Area Sch. Dist, 49 Pa.Cmwlth. 131 , 410 A.2d 407, 408 (1980). … See Slochower v. Board of Higher Education of New York City, 350 U.S. 551 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956).

Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Peternel

418 Pa. 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965

Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 442 , 127 A. 2d 738 (1956), and Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of Directors, 381 Pa. 561 , 112 A. 2d 192 (1955). … Verratti v. Ridley Township, supra, and Lhormer v. Bowen, supra, are inapposite to the present case.

Christy Case

362 Pa. 347 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1949

Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377, 382 , 14 S. Ct. 570 , 38 L. Ed. 485 (1893). … Admission to the bar of a court is a judicial act, Hoopes v. Bradshaw, 231 Pa. 485 , 80 A. 1098 (1911); Stewart v.

Gouwens v. Indiana Twp Bd of Sup Pet of Fox Chapel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2021

: : : INDIANA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS AND FOX CHAPEL : ESTATES, L.P. … : : : INDIANA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS AND FOX CHAPEL : ESTATES, L.P.

Bank of the Northern Liberties v. Cresson

12 Serg. & Rawle 306 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1825

Maleverer v. Redshaw, 1 Mod. 35. … Rex v. Loxdale and others, 1 Burr. 447.

Terrizzi Beverage Co. v. Local Union No. 830

408 Pa. 380 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1962

to that board’s determination. … Appellee’s argument that “slow down” by members of a union is not such an activity as is protected or prohibited by the National Labor Relations Board is given weight by the case of International Union v.

Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Clairton

390 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1957

In Jacobs v. … In Oteri Appeal, 372 Pa. 557 , 94 A. 2d 772 , a bill in equity was brought by an adjoining neighbor to enjoin the order of a Board of Adjustment granting a building variance; in Wyszynski v.

In Re: Extending March 27, 2020, Order Regarding Timing And Means For Holding Hearings Before The Board of Law Examiners

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 2020

OF LAW EXAMINERS : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2020, upon the recommendation of the Board of Law Examiners … (“the Board”), IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, that Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Court’s Order of March 27, 2020, are extended and modified as follows: 2.

Blumner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

362 Pa. 7 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1949

It is well settled that an equitable estate may be partitioned: Stewart v. Brown, 2 S. & R. 461 (1816); Willing and Wife v. Brown, 7 S. & R. 467 (1822) ; Longwell v. … The order sustaining the preliminary objection of Gladys Kay Hartmann to the plaintiff Blumner’s complaint is affirmed; costs to be paid by appellant. 1 See Wells v. Brown, 61 D. & C. 511 (1948) and Barrett v.