Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.44s
JOHNSTON, INC. v. Com., Dept. of Revenue
556 Pa. 22 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1999
On March 1, 1996, the Board of Appeals denied relief. Johnston appealed to the Board of Finance and Revenue (“Board”). … Commonwealth v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedIn Re: Temporarily Modifying Rules 602(a), 603(a), and 604(a) of PaRJA
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2020
(“the Board”), IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, and Rule 1952(A) of the Rules of Judicial Administration, that Rules 602(a), 603(a) and 604(a) of the Pennsylvania … The Board is authorized to provide, via remote video instruction approved by the Board, the required number of hours of continuing education set forth in Rules 602(a), 603(a) and 604(a) to any member of the Minor Judiciary
Cited 0 timesPublished395 Pa. 122 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1959
Jones in Richman v. … In Gold v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedMcConnell v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue
503 Pa. 322 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1983
Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company, 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734, 737 (1975), citing Wright, Class Actions, 47 F.R.D. 169 , 170 (1970), quoting Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 560 (2d Cir.1968). … See Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company, 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734 (1975). .
Cited 12 timesPublished353 Pa. 619 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1946
(Citing cases); in Luce v. Snively, Vol. … Vol. 4, sec. 1241(4). 5 Llewellin v. Mackworth, 2 Atk. 40; Villiers v. Villiers, ib, 71.
Cited 4 timesPublished266 Pa. 277 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1920
between the parties, and, therefore, the board was without jurisdiction in the premises. … without prejudice” import an agreement that existing rights shall not be affected by tbe payment, but “shall be as open to settlement by negotiation or legal controversy, as if tbe money bad not been turned over”: Genet v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedTrustees of the Philadelphia Museums v. Trustees of the University
251 Pa. 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1915
The status of the board is similar to that of the Carnegie Free Library Board in Laird v. … In the case of Attorney General v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHarrisburg School District v. Zogby
574 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2003
See generally Danson v. … Dist. v.
Cited 47 timesPublishedIn re Judicial Conduct Board Subpoena No. 96076
550 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1997
Const., Article V, § 18(b)(5) (emphasis added). … Prior to that event, the board acts confidentially 2 and independently of the court. Pa. Const., Article V, § 18(a)(8).
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn Re Land Use Appeal of Southeastern Chester County Refuse Authority
595 Pa. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2007
this 17th day of December, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for proceedings consistent with Wistuk v. … Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board and Lower Mt. Bethel Twp. Board of Supervisors, 592 Pa. 419 , 925 A.2d 768 (2007).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCommonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of Philadelphia
176 Pa. 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1896
The duties of the controller as was held in Com. v. … The contract it is to be noted was made by the board of education for a matter clearly within their department.
Cited 27 timesPublished155 Pa. 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1893
It was said in Smith v. Milligan, 43 Pa. 109 , by Mr. Justice Strong : “ The relationship of a father-in-law to his son-in-law is not so intimate. … That he had to pay his board wherever he was, and that it was pleasant and quiet there for him.” It was also proved that decedent with his wife had boarded previously with appellee and had paid for their board.
Cited 9 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Herman
493 Pa. 267 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1981
Board Report, p. 7. … See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194 , 425 A.2d 730 (1981); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Súber Lewis, 493 Pa. 519 , 426 A.2d 1138 (1981).
Cited 11 timesPublishedCommercial Properties, Inc. v. Peternel
418 Pa. 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965
Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 442 , 127 A. 2d 738 (1956), and Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of Directors, 381 Pa. 561 , 112 A. 2d 192 (1955). … Verratti v. Ridley Township, supra, and Lhormer v. Bowen, supra, are inapposite to the present case.
Cited 60 timesPublishedGouwens v. Indiana Twp Bd of Sup Pet of Fox Chapel
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2021
: : : INDIANA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS AND FOX CHAPEL : ESTATES, L.P. … : : : INDIANA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS AND FOX CHAPEL : ESTATES, L.P.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrookside Distilling Products Corp. v. Monarch Wine Co.
367 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1951
Appellant is engaged in the business of buying finished wine in bulk, bottling it, and reselling it to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, hereafter referred to as the Board. … (Wolstenholme v. Randall, Inc., supra; Industrial Rayon Corp. v. Caplan, supra; Bennett v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn the Matter of: Stephen Daniel Brinton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2020
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2691 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 88 DB 2020 : v … Respondent shall provide to the Board the name and contact information of his parole and probation officer and shall immediately report to the Board any changes to this information and/or a transfer
Cited 0 timesPublishedBank of the Northern Liberties v. Cresson
12 Serg. & Rawle 306 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1825
Maleverer v. Redshaw, 1 Mod. 35. … Rex v. Loxdale and others, 1 Burr. 447.
Cited 7 timesPublished559 Pa. 21 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1999
See Cooper v. Delaware Valley Med. … Hayes’ ability to challenge the Board of Directors’ decision, and thus on Dr. Hayes’ professional future, this appeal is not moot. See Sonder v.
Cited 13 timesPublished461 Pa. 309 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975
Commonwealth v. Joseph, 451 Pa. 440 , 304 A.2d 163 (1973); Commonwealth v. Williams, 443 Pa. 85 , 277 A.2d 781 (1971). … Commonwealth v. Clair,-Pa.-, 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187 , 296 A.2d 741 (1972). Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Cited 17 timesPublished
Ask Donna