Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.44s

  • JOHNSTON, INC. v. Com., Dept. of Revenue

    556 Pa. 22 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1999

    On March 1, 1996, the Board of Appeals denied relief. Johnston appealed to the Board of Finance and Revenue (“Board”). … Commonwealth v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re: Temporarily Modifying Rules 602(a), 603(a), and 604(a) of PaRJA

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2020

    (“the Board”), IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, and Rule 1952(A) of the Rules of Judicial Administration, that Rules 602(a), 603(a) and 604(a) of the Pennsylvania … The Board is authorized to provide, via remote video instruction approved by the Board, the required number of hours of continuing education set forth in Rules 602(a), 603(a) and 604(a) to any member of the Minor Judiciary

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kline Zoning Case

    395 Pa. 122 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1959

    Jones in Richman v. … In Gold v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • McConnell v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue

    503 Pa. 322 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1983

    Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company, 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734, 737 (1975), citing Wright, Class Actions, 47 F.R.D. 169 , 170 (1970), quoting Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 560 (2d Cir.1968). … See Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Company, 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734 (1975). .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Koch Election Contest Case

    353 Pa. 619 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1946

    (Citing cases); in Luce v. Snively, Vol. … Vol. 4, sec. 1241(4). 5 Llewellin v. Mackworth, 2 Atk. 40; Villiers v. Villiers, ib, 71.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hand's Case

    266 Pa. 277 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1920

    between the parties, and, therefore, the board was without jurisdiction in the premises. … without prejudice” import an agreement that existing rights shall not be affected by tbe payment, but “shall be as open to settlement by negotiation or legal controversy, as if tbe money bad not been turned over”: Genet v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Trustees of the Philadelphia Museums v. Trustees of the University

    251 Pa. 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1915

    The status of the board is similar to that of the Carnegie Free Library Board in Laird v. … In the case of Attorney General v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Harrisburg School District v. Zogby

    574 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2003

    See generally Danson v. … Dist. v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • In re Judicial Conduct Board Subpoena No. 96076

    550 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1997

    Const., Article V, § 18(b)(5) (emphasis added). … Prior to that event, the board acts confidentially 2 and independently of the court. Pa. Const., Article V, § 18(a)(8).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Land Use Appeal of Southeastern Chester County Refuse Authority

    595 Pa. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2007

    this 17th day of December, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for proceedings consistent with Wistuk v. … Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board and Lower Mt. Bethel Twp. Board of Supervisors, 592 Pa. 419 , 925 A.2d 768 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of Philadelphia

    176 Pa. 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1896

    The duties of the controller as was held in Com. v. … The contract it is to be noted was made by the board of education for a matter clearly within their department.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. Hasbrouck

    155 Pa. 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1893

    It was said in Smith v. Milligan, 43 Pa. 109 , by Mr. Justice Strong : “ The relationship of a father-in-law to his son-in-law is not so intimate. … That he had to pay his board wherever he was, and that it was pleasant and quiet there for him.” It was also proved that decedent with his wife had boarded previously with appellee and had paid for their board.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Herman

    493 Pa. 267 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1981

    Board Report, p. 7. … See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194 , 425 A.2d 730 (1981); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Súber Lewis, 493 Pa. 519 , 426 A.2d 1138 (1981).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Peternel

    418 Pa. 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965

    Philadelphia, 387 Pa. 442 , 127 A. 2d 738 (1956), and Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of Directors, 381 Pa. 561 , 112 A. 2d 192 (1955). … Verratti v. Ridley Township, supra, and Lhormer v. Bowen, supra, are inapposite to the present case.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Gouwens v. Indiana Twp Bd of Sup Pet of Fox Chapel

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2021

    : : : INDIANA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS AND FOX CHAPEL : ESTATES, L.P. … : : : INDIANA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : SUPERVISORS AND FOX CHAPEL : ESTATES, L.P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brookside Distilling Products Corp. v. Monarch Wine Co.

    367 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1951

    Appellant is engaged in the business of buying finished wine in bulk, bottling it, and reselling it to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, hereafter referred to as the Board. … (Wolstenholme v. Randall, Inc., supra; Industrial Rayon Corp. v. Caplan, supra; Bennett v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of: Stephen Daniel Brinton

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2020

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2691 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 88 DB 2020 : v … Respondent shall provide to the Board the name and contact information of his parole and probation officer and shall immediately report to the Board any changes to this information and/or a transfer

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bank of the Northern Liberties v. Cresson

    12 Serg. & Rawle 306 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1825

    Maleverer v. Redshaw, 1 Mod. 35. … Rex v. Loxdale and others, 1 Burr. 447.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Mercy Health Corp.

    559 Pa. 21 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1999

    See Cooper v. Delaware Valley Med. … Hayes’ ability to challenge the Board of Directors’ decision, and thus on Dr. Hayes’ professional future, this appeal is not moot. See Sonder v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Bryant

    461 Pa. 309 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

    Commonwealth v. Joseph, 451 Pa. 440 , 304 A.2d 163 (1973); Commonwealth v. Williams, 443 Pa. 85 , 277 A.2d 781 (1971). … Commonwealth v. Clair,-Pa.-, 326 A.2d 272 (1974); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187 , 296 A.2d 741 (1972). Judgment of sentence affirmed.

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.