Case law

Commonwealth v. Bell

512 Pa. 334 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1986

Reed, 398 Pa. 172 , 157 A.2d 170 (1960); Home Life Insurance Co. of America v. Board of Adjustment of Lower Merion Township, 393 Pa. 447 , 143 A.2d 21 (1958); Dwyer v. … Pickett v. Brown, 462 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2199 , 76 L.Ed.2d 372 (1983); Craig v. Boren, supra; Reed v. Reed, supra; Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636 , 95 S.Ct. 1225 , 43 L.Ed.2d 514 (1975); James v.

Mechanicsburg Distributing, Pets v. LCB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2016

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL : BOARD, : : Respondent

Malt Beverarge Distributors Assn. v. Pa. LCB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2016

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL : BOARD, : : Respondent

Malt Beverage Dist. Assn. v. LCB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2016

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL : BOARD, : : Respondent

Malt Beverage Dist. Assn. v. LCB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2016

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL : BOARD, : : Respondent

Malt Beverage Dist Assn v. LCB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2016

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL : BOARD, : : Respondent

Commonwealth v. Reid, A., Aplt

627 Pa. 78 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2014

Commonwealth v. … v.

Hall v. West Chester Publishing Co.

180 Pa. 561 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1897

But as said by Mitchell on Motions and Rules, p. 75: “The rule as stated by Chief Justice Shabswood in O’Hara v. … See also France v. Ruddiman, 126 Pa. 259 ; Adams v. Grey, 154 Pa. 258 .

Williams v. Spaulding Bakeries, Inc.

464 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1975

We further direct the Board to conduct a new hearing at which Williams may endeavor to supply the necessary proof. See Dunn v. Merck & Company, Inc., supra. See also Brubaker v. … See Porter v. Sterling Supply Corp., supra. But cf. Habovick v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, 207 Pa.Super. 80 , 215 A.2d 389 (1965). Therefore, we are unable to sustain the Board’s decision upon this ground. 6 .

Mathies Coal v. Dept. of Env. Res.

522 Pa. 7 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 1989

Citing its opinion in Department of Environmental Resources v. … Mathies Coal Company v. DER, 100 Pa.Cmwlth.Ct. at 314, 514 A.2d at 678, 679 .

Commonwealth v. Ryder

467 Pa. 484 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1976

As this Court said in Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Evancho, 379 Pa. 273 , 108 A.2d 719 (1954); Commonwealth v. Woods, 366 Pa. 618 , 79 A.2d 408 (1951). This in no sense deprived the appellant of a fair trial.

Quigley, C. v. UCBR, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

Parties may appeal a referee’s decision to the Board, who is the final arbiter in UC matters. See Ductmate Indus., Inc. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 949 A.2d 338, 342 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008); see also Peak v. … Black Lick Trucking, Inc. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 667 A.2d 454, 457 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995); see also Jordan v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 547 A.2d 811, 812-813 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998).

Murdaugh v. Oxford Borough

214 Pa. 384 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1906

These bars were securely bolted to the board, one near either end, and the bent ends served as legs to support the board. … Borough authorities are not required to seek for defects in sidewalks, but only to be vigilant to observe them by the exercise of reasonable supervision : Lohr v. Philipsburg Borough, 156 Pa. 246 .

In re Anonymous Nos. 4 & 35 D.B. 79

5 Pa. D. & C.4th 557 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1989

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … Brown, Douglas, and Stoelker did not participate in the adjudication.

Commonwealth v. Zimmerman

498 Pa. 112 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1981

As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. … Brown v. Ohio, supra; U.S. v. Wilson, 420 U.S. 332 , 95 S.Ct. 1013 , 43 L.Ed.2d 232 (1975); Green v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lewis

3 Pa. D. & C.5th 406 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2007

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: BROWN, Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent, F. Lee Lewis, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years.

Mkt. East Assoc., LP v. Pa. G. C. Bd.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2016

: Appeal from the Pennsylvania Gaming : Control Board's November 18, 2014 Order : granting Stadium Casino, LLC's v … : Appeal from the Pennsylvania Gaming : Control Board's November 18, 2014 Order : granting Stadium Casino, LLC's v

In re Franklin Film Manufacturing Corp.

253 Pa. 422 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1916

new power is conferred upon a court of nisi prius, to be exercised in a summary method or in a way different from the common law, the right of review by this court, on certiorari, follows as a matter of course: Buckmyer v. … It is now established beyond controversy that the legislature may create an administrative body with discretion and authority to determine facts (Buffalo Branch, Mutual Film Corporation, v.

McCloskey v. Snowden

212 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1905

Chief Justice Mitchell, ■ This bill is clearly one of interference in the internal management of a foreign corporation, and as such is not distinguishable from Madden v. Electric Light Co., 181 Pa. 617 . … In Madden v.

Fleming v. Adamson

321 Pa. 28 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1935

On April 5,1933, two of the commissioners, Adamson and Brown-miller, describing themselves “as the majority of tlxe Board of Commissioners 2 of said county,” filed an answer entitled, “Answer of the County of Schuylkill,” … It is a principle of equity practice (Schwab v. Miller, 302 Pa. 507 , 153 A. 731 ; Miron v.