Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.99s

  • Hughey, D. v. WCAB (Andorra Woods)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2018

    : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (ANDORRA WOODS : HEALTHCARE CENTER, GALLAGHER : BASSETT SERVICES, ACE … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (ANDORRA WOODS : HEALTHCARE CENTER, GALLAGHER : BASSETT SERVICES, ACE

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coal Township School Directors

    290 Pa. 200 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1927

    We said in Lamb v. … “Public officers cannot by contract or otherwise make over to private persons their functions or powers, for these are committed to them for the public welfare and not for private gain”: Dennison v. Padden, 89 Pa. 395 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lincoln Phila. Realty Associates v. BD. OF REVISION OF TAXES OF CITY AND CTY. OF PHILADELPHIA

    758 A.2d 1178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2000

    Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County, 459 Pa. 268, 279 , 328 A.2d 819, 824 (1974) (plurality); see also Academy Plaza Assoc., Ltd. v. … But see Ward v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Authority v. ZHB Penn Forest Twp

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2022

    THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ATLANTIC WIND, LLC : No. 159 MAL 2022 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENN : FOREST

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Auth v. ZHB of Penn Forest Twp.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2022

    2022 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENN : FOREST TOWNSHIP : : PETITION OF: PENN FORREST TOWNSHIP

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williamson's Estate

    153 Pa. 508 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1893

    These are the assessors, the board of revision, and the court of common pleas. … The fund being distributable here is subject to the collateral inheritance tax under the rule stated in Miller v. The Commonwealth, 111 Pa. 321 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Schmidt v. Commonwealth

    495 Pa. 238 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 1981

    A petition for review under Section 234 is deemed filed only when it is actually received by the Board of Finance and Revenue. Commonwealth v. J. & R. … Commonwealth, Department of Revenue v. Niemey *241 er Oldsmobile, Inc., 12 Pa.Cmwlth. 388 , 316 A.2d 152 (1974).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Bedford v. Rosser

    283 Pa. 345 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1925

    J. 841; Maginnis v. Schlottman, 271 Pa. 305 . … The board to revise taxes has the right to call to ‘its assistance experts, so that a proper valuation of coal lands and other real estate may be had (Pardee v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Maloney v. Stahlnecker

    341 Pa. 517 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1941

    Appeals by all appellants to the Superior Court followed and that Court very properly ordered the reinstatement of appellant, MacDonald, for the reason set *521 forth in Kassarich v. Unemply. Comp. Board, 139 Pa. … by the Board was not subject to review *522 by that Court.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Imperial Asphalt Corp. of Pennsylvania Zoning Case

    359 Pa. 402 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1948

    Superior Ct. 502 ; Taylor v. Haverford Twp., 299 Pa. 402, 414 , 149 A. 639 ; Gilfillan’s Permit, 291 Pa. 358 , 140 A. 136 . … The Board made no findings of fact and gave no reason for its decision.” In other words, the board had not justified its action as the law requires.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Strinich v. Clairton School District

    494 Pa. 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1981

    . *305 In Johnson v. … Compare, Jones v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 25 Pa.Cmwlth. 546, 551 , 360 A.2d 821, 824 (1976).

    Overruled — as noted by a later courtCited 17 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Carelli

    377 Pa. Super. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1988

    The Brown court found the Lopez-Hoffa-Lewis line to be applicable to the facts in Brown , as the defendant in Brown had voluntarily surrendered the gun he had used as a murder weapon, to a known policeman, who was "undercover … Brown, supra, [261 A.2d], at p. 882, citing Hoffa, supra, 385 U.S. at 302 , 87 S.Ct. at 413 . . The majority notes that Commonwealth v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Crawford Central School District v. Commonwealth

    585 Pa. 131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2005

    The Commonwealth Court affirmed the Board’s decision. See Crawford Central School District v. … Board of Assessment Appeals of Erie County, 574 Pa. 84 , 828 A.2d 1057, 1061 (2003) (citing Thornburgh v. Lewis, 504 Pa. 206 , 470 A.2d 952, 953 (1983)).

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Balch

    328 Pa. Super. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1984

    One of them was wearing a short-sleeved brown shirt and brown pants. This matched the clothing worn by the defendant Balch later that evening at the time of the defendant’s arrest at approximately 10 p.m. … He was also able to identify the short-sleeved brown shirt and brown pants worn by the defendant Balch.” (Opinion, June 7, 1982, at 2-4.) Motions to suppress the pillowcase and silverware seized by the police from Mr.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Marshall, Jr., Aplts v. Commonwealth

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2019

    Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court at No. 863 FR : 2015 dated December 13, 2018 v … the exceptions and entered : judgment against taxpayer of the : November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : the PA Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blue Cross Appeal

    416 Pa. 574 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965

    Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank, 403 Pa. 391 , 170 A. 2d 87 . 3 Therefore, the standing or lack of standing on the part of the City to appeal from the Board’s action is not presently before ns for determination: Witney v. … . §5452.4 providing Board’s power and duty and Act of May 22, 1933, P. L. 853, §520, 72 P.S. §5020-520 providing- right of appeal from Board’s action.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Philadelphia

    400 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1960

    Each board shall select a hospital director or superintendent who shall, subject to the authority of the board, administer the hospital in all its departments. … Curll v. Dairymen’s C. S. Association, 389 Pa. 216 , 132 A. 2d 271 ; Erie v. Gulf Oil Corpration, 395 Pa. 383 , 150 A. 2d 351 ; Kelly v. Philadelphia, 382 Pa. 459 , 115 A. 2d 238 ; McDonald v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • McDevitt v. McDevitt

    365 Pa. 18 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1950

    Philadelphia, 826 Pa. 302 , 308, 192 A. 133, 136 ; Goldstein v. International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, 328 Pa. 385, 389 , 196 A. 43, 46 . … Cornell & Son, Inc. v. Rosenwald, 339 Pa. 18 , 13 A. 2d 716 ; Margolies v. Zimmerman, 341 Pa. 493 , 19 A. 2d 737 . The order of the court below denying appellant’s petition is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Allegheny County Prison Employees Local Union 693 v. McClelland

    410 Pa. 654 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1963

    L. 829, Prison Board is responsible for the control, management, maintenance, and discipline over prison matters and prison employees. See Miller v. County of Allegheny, 109 Pitt. *657 L.J. 136, 137 (1961). … In addition, the salary schedules of prison employees cannot be considered by Salary Board without a request first being made to that body by the executive head of Prison Board. See Simon v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMAN

    365 Pa. 168 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1950

    Superior Ct. 38 , 1 A. 2d 839 ; Demmel v. Dilworth Company et al., 136 Pa. Superior Ct. 37 , 7 A. 2d 50 ; Meyers v. Lehigh Valley Transportation Company et al., 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 569 , 10 A. 2d 879 ; Rowles v. … This reads: “The board, or a referee designated by the board, may, at any time, review and modify or set aside an original or supplemental agreement, upon petition filed by either party with the board or in the course of

    Cited 24 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.