Case law

Whitehead v. Bank of Pittsburgh

2 Watts & Serg. 172 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1841

Burton v. Isset, (5 Barn. & Ald. 207). This case goes farther than was done here. But it is good sense as well as law. … The case of Purviance v.

Yocum Zoning Case

393 Pa. 148 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1958

Cf: Fagan v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 389 Pa. 99 , 132 A. 2d 279 . … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 387 Pa. 552 , 128 A. 2d 559 ; Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment’s Appeal, 313 Pa. 523 , 170 A. 867 ; Perelman et al. v. Yeadon Borough Board of Adjustment et al., 144 Pa.

Cummings v. Nazareth Borough

427 Pa. 14 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1967

(Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc., 388 Pa. 1 ). The short distance to the bottom of the pool from the one-meter board was not glaringly obvious. … Jemison v. Pfeifer, 397 Pa. 81 . “The diving board was an invitation for the use, with an implied representation that its use was not dangerous.” City of Ferguson v. Marrow, 210 F. 2d 520 .

Commonwealth v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc.

563 Pa. 170 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2000

Merlino v. Delaware County, 556 Pa. 422 , 728 A.2d 949 (1999). As such, our examination here must commence with the statutory provisions utilized by the Board to support its award. … See Big "B” Mining Co. v. Department of Envtl.

Marshall, Jr., Aplt v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2019

Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court at No. 863 FR : 2015 dated December 13, 2018 v … the exceptions and entered : judgment against taxpayer of the : November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : the PA Board

Clark v. Pennsylvania State Police

496 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1981

Mrahunec v. Fausti, 385 Pa. 64 , 121 A.2d 878 (1956). … Roth v. Hartl, 365 Pa. 428 , 75 A.2d 583 (1970); Hilton v. State Employment Retirement Board, 23 Pa. Cmwlth. 639, 353 A.2d 883 (1976).

In Re Braig

527 Pa. 248 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1991

Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Cambridge

386 Pa. Super. 542 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 1989

Commonwealth v. Brown, 489 Pa. 285 , 414 A.2d 70 (1980). Relevant evidence is admissible if its probative value outweighs its prejudicial impact. Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, supra; 4 Commonwealth v. Allen, supra.

Tronzo v. COM., UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD.

514 Pa. 24 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1987

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 476 Pa. 617 , 383 A.2d 533 (1978); Frumento v. … . § 1928(c); LeGare v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; Warner Co. v.

Valley Forge Industries, Inc. Appeal

406 Pa. 387 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1962

The lower Court did not take any additioiial testimony and therefore the sole question properly before it was whether the Board of Adjustment had committed an error of law or a manifest abuse of its discretion: Moyerman v … Glanzberg, 391 Pa. 387 , 138 A. 2d 681 ; Richman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 391 Pa. 254 , 137 A. 2d 280 ; *389 Archbishop O’Hara’s Appeal, 389 Pa. 35 , 131 A. 2d 587 .

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Casety

511 Pa. 177 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1986

Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucarini, 504 Pa. 271 , 472 A.2d 186 (1983); Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Kneep, 497 Pa. 396 , 441 A.2d 1197 (1982); Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. … Office of the Discipli *182 nary Counsel v. Campbell, 463 Pa. 472 , 345 A.2d 616 (1975).

Com. v. Dunmore B. Sch. Dirs.

343 Pa. 440 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1941

See Ruby v. Penn Fibre Bd. Corp. , 326 Pa. 582 , 586 . … See Com. v. Blatt , 165 Pa. 213 . Appeal quashed. Costs to be paid by appellants.

Driscoll v. McAlister Bros., Inc.

294 Pa. 169 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1928

It first states *172 that, “Any court before whom an appeal is pending from any action of the board may remit the record to the board for more specific findings of fact, if the findings of the board or referee are not, in … This was all carefully explained in Vorbnoff v.

Labuck v. Mill Creek Coal Co.

292 Pa. 284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1927

”: Kuca v. … Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163, 165 ; Roach v. Oswald Lever Co., 274 Pa. 139, 141 ; Zelazny v. Seneca Coal Mining Co., 275 Pa. 397, 399 ; Watkins v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 278 Pa. 463, 465 .

Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

497 Pa. 115 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1981

See Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co., 479 Pa. 286 , 388 A.2d 659 (1978). … See, e.g., Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 489 Pa. 485, 486 , 414 A.2d 625, 626 (1980); Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S.

McKinley v. Luzerne Township School District

383 Pa. 289 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1955

City of Philadelphia, 99 Pa. 164 ; County of Crawford v. Nash, 99 Pa. 253 ; McCormick v. Fayette County, 150 Pa. 190 , 24 A. 667 ; Sefler v. Borough of McKees Rocks, 72 Pa. Superior Ct. 81 . … Hanover Township School District, 242 Pa. 359 , 89 A. 552 ; Ritzman v. *294 Coal Township School Directors, 317 Pa. 271 , 176 A. 447 ; McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District, 335 Pa. 17 , 6 A. 2d 291 .

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Surrick

521 Pa. 264 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1989

See First Amendment Coalition v. Judicial Inquiry and Review Board, 579 F.Supp. 192 (E.D. Pa.1984), vacated, 784 F.2d 467 (3rd Cir.1986). … V, § 18; First Amendment Coalition v. Judicial Inquiry and Review Board, 501 Pa. 129 , 460 A.2d 722 (1983).

Zebra v. Pittsburgh School District

449 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1972

Keystone Guild, Inc. v. Pappas, supra. … Hibbs v. Arensberg, 276 Pa. 24, 26 , 119 A. 727, 728 (1923). “It is only when the board transcends the limits of its legal discretion that it is amenable to the injunctive processes of a court of equity.” Landerman v.

Ctr. Coalfield Justice v. Wash., Apl. of: RNC/RPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2025

See Burdick v. … Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Vartan

733 A.2d 1258 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1999

v. … In E.P.A. v.