Case law

RNC and RPP, Pets v. Schmidt, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2024

See Stilp v. Hafer, 718 A.2d 290, 292 (Pa. 1998) (“Laches .. bars relief when a complaining party is guilty of want of due diligence in failing to promptly institute an action to the prejudice of another.); Kelly v. … Republican Nat’l Comm. v. Schmidt (Pa.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Preski

635 Pa. 220 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2016

Following argument, the Board recommended that Preski be disbarred, noting that the facts of this case were strikingly similar to those in ODC v. … ODC v. Christie, 639 A.2d 782, 785 (Pa. 1994).

Arthurs v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

886 A.2d 679 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2005

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for consideration of this court’s decision in McCray v.

Pocono Pines Corp. v. Pennsylvania Game Commission

464 Pa. 17 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 1975

In Tigue v. … See Stanton v. United States, 434 F.2d 1273 (5th Cir.1970).

Nederostek v. Endicott-Johnson Shoe Co.

415 Pa. 136 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1964

Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., 414 Pa. 325 , 200 A. 2d 398 (1964). … Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., supra. The court below indicated *139 that plaintiff’s basic allegation was susceptible of many interpretations.

Legman v. Scranton School District

432 Pa. 342 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1968

See Schrader v. Heath, 408 Pa. 79 , 182 A. 2d 696 (1962). … Conrad v. Pittsburgh, 421 Pa. 492 , 218 A. 2d 906 (1966); Baker v. Brennan, 419 Pa. 222 , 213 A. 2d 362 (1965); Schrader v.

Ehret v. Kulpmont Borough School District

333 Pa. 518 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1938

See Wilson et ux. v. Phila. School District et al., 328 Pa. 225, 236 . … See Essinger v. New Castle, 275 Pa. 408, 410; State ex rel. Karnes v. Board of Regents, 222 Wis. 542 , 269 N. W. 284 .

In Re Appeal of Miller

511 Pa. 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1986

Pyzdrowski v. Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 437 Pa. 481 , 263 A.2d 426 (1970); Stratford Arms, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 429 Pa. 132 , 239 A.2d 325 (1968); Gross v. … See Fidler v. Zoning Board *641 of Adjustment of Upper Macungie Township, 408 Pa. 260 , 182 A.2d 692 (1962).

Commonwealth ex rel. Rambeau v. Rundle

455 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1973

The analysis contained in Escoe v. … Hendrickson v. State Board of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A. 2d 581 (1962). In Mays v. Nelson, 323 F. Supp. 587 (N.D.

In re Anonymous No. 3 D.B. 90

14 Pa. D. & C.4th 470 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1992

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Braun, 520 Pa. 157 , 553 A.2d 894, 895-896 (1989); Disciplinary Board Rules §89.293. … Brown and Hill did not participate in the adjudication.

Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.

431 Pa. 446 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1968

Courts do have the power to determine whether or not the Board’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence. Vorbnoff v. … The claimant notes that in Petrone v.

McLaughlin v. Lansford Borough School District

335 Pa. 17 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1938

A variety of illustrations of such action by the courts will be found in many decisions, among them: Wilson v. Philadelphia School District, 328 Pa. 225, 239 , 195 A. 90 ; Ritzman v. … Arensberg, 276 Pa. 24 , 119 A. 727 ; Mason v. Hanover Township School District, 242 Pa. 359 , 89 A. 552 ; Lamb v.

Rieck Ice Cream Co. Appeal

417 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1965

Finally, we call attention to our decisions handed down in McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 234 , 209 A. 2d 389 (1965) and in Deitch Company v. … See Pittsburgh Miracle Mile Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 243 , 209 A. 2d 394 (1965) ; McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v.

Landerman v. Churchill Area School District

414 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1964

“It is only where the board transcends the limits of its legal discretion that it is amenable to the injunctive processes of a court of equity: Detweiler v. … Joint Boards of School Directors, 381 Pa. 338, 349 , 113 A. 2d 281, 287 (1955). The burden of showing such a clear abuse of discretion is a heavy one. Regan v. Stoddard, 361 Pa. 469 , 65 A. 2d 240 (1949); Hibbs v.

Shaler Area School District v. Salakas

494 Pa. 630 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1981

Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pa. Dept. of Transportation, 36 Pa.Cmwlth. 8, 17 , 387 A.2d *637 501, 505 (1978); J. Berman & Sons, Inc. v. Pa. … Boehm v. Board of Education, 30 Pa.Cmwlth. 468, 474 , 373 A.2d 1372, 1375 (1977); Fatscher v. Springfield School District, 28 Pa.Cmwlth. 170, 174 , 367 A.2d 1130, 1132 (1977).

MacK Zoning Appeal

384 Pa. 586 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1956

Stuart Realty Corporation, 364 *589 Pa. 616, 621, 73 A. 2d 407, 409 ; Davis Appeal, 367 Pa. 340, 345 , 80 A. 2d 789, 791 ; Philadelphia Art Alliance v. … From the decision of the Board on this second petition the present appeal was properly taken within the time prescribed by statute. Order affirmed. * Cf. apparently contra, Triolo v.

New PA Project, Pets v. Schmidt, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2024

This Court issued its opinion on undated and incorrectly dated ballot envelopes in Ball v. … State Ass’n of Jury Comm’rs v. Commonwealth, 64 A.3d 611, 618 (Pa. 2013).

Brozzetti, F. v. PGCB, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2025

LLC v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm’n, 234 A.3d 665, 667- 68 (Pa. 2020)). … Supply, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 131 A.3d 977, 984 (Pa. 2016); Warrantech Consumer Prod. Servs. v. Reliance Ins. Co. in Liquidation, 96 A.3d 346, 354-55 (Pa.

Teitelbaum, R. v. PGCB, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2025

LLC v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm’n, 234 A.3d 665, 667- 68 (Pa. 2020)). … Supply, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 131 A.3d 977, 984 (Pa. 2016); Warrantech Consumer Prod. Servs. v. Reliance Ins. Co. in Liquidation, 96 A.3d 346, 354-55 (Pa.

Genesee Township Independent School District v. McDonald

98 Pa. 444 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1881

It is only where a director has neglected to attend two successive regular, or as defined in Zulich v. Bowman, 6 Wr. 83, stated, meetings of the directors, that his seat can be declared vacant. … This, according to the ruling in Tobin v. Morgan, 20 P. F. Smith 229, was a substantial compliance with the fourth section of the Act of April 11th 1862.