Case law

Heath v. WCAB (BD. OF PROB. AND PAR.)

860 A.2d 25 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2004

In a published opinion, the Commonwealth Court affirmed the Board's order. Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole), 811 A.2d 90 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). … Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole), 573 Pa. 700 , 825 A.2d 1263 (2003).

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Cunningham

337 Pa. 289 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1939

Compare Com, ex rel. v. Brown, 327 Pa. 136, 142 , 193 *300 A. 258. That right is taken away by the Act. … The contract, it is to be noted, was made by the board of education for a matter clearly within their department.

Hastings v. Speer

34 Pa. Super. 478 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1907

Brown. … Co., 14 Pa. 302 ; Sidwell v. Evans, 1 P. & W. 383; Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Flynn, 98 Pa. 627, 636 .

Stimmler v. Chestnut Hill Hospital

602 Pa. 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2009

Atcovitz v. … Penn Center House, Inc. v.

Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.

264 Pa. 529 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1919

Imperial Co., supra, p. 326-7; Lane v. … Imperial Co., supra, 327; Lane v.

Commonwealth v. Williams

456 Pa. 550 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1974

Commonwealth v. Lee, 450 Pa. 152, 156-57 , 299 A.2d 640 (1973); Commonwealth v. Person, 450 Pa. 1, 4-5 , 297 A.2d 460 (1972); Commonwealth v. Brown, 443 Pa. 274, 277 , 278 A.2d 170 (1971); Commonwealth v. … In short, a sentence will not be reviewed “unless there has been a showing of illegality,” Commonwealth v. Brown, supra.

In re Bruno

627 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2014

Board’s Brief at 27-29 & nn. 10, 13 (citing Pa. Const, art. V, § 10(a) (1968); 42 Pa.C.S. § 502). … Board’s Brief at 51-53 (citing Pa. Const, árt. V, § 10(a)).

Ellenbogen v. County of Allegheny

479 Pa. 429 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1978

Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 479 Pa. 449 , 388 A.2d 740 (1978) (Sweet II); Bucks County Board of *436 Judges v. … See Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 479 Pa. 449 , 388 A.2d 740 (1978) (Sweet II); Bucks County Board of Judges v. Bucks County Commissioners, 479 Pa. 455 , 388 A.2d 743 (1978).

School District v. Fuess

98 Pa. 600 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1881

This principle applies to municipal corporations : Painter v. The City of Pitts- *606 burg, 10 Wr. 213. … Tlie directors as a board must exercise their powers — tlie board may make contracts, may authorize a committee to make a contract, and may appoint an agent for a proper and specific purpose.

Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrick III, J., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2021

Brown, 490 F.2d at 763. The Brown Court acknowledged the risk that juries may be unable or unwilling to follow the limiting instruction and instead use the statement for an improper purpose. Id. at 764. … Commonwealth v. Wright, 691 A.2d 119, 151 (Pa. 2008).

In re Private Road in Speers Boro, II

608 Pa. 302 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 2011

McGavitt v. Guttman Realty Company, 909 A.2d 1, 5 (Pa.Super.2006). … As such, our courts from early in the history of the Act have construed it as requiring the ‘strictest necessity.’ ” Graff v.

Michener Appeal

382 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1955

App.); Oklahoma City v. Harris, 191 Okla. 125 , 126 P. 2d 988 ; O’Rourke v. Teeters, 63 Cal. App. 2d, 349 , 146 P. 2d 983 . See also Schleifer v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 374 Pa. 277 , 97 A. 2d 782 . … In Beck v. Board of Adjustment of City of East Orange, 15 N.J.

Symons v. National Electric Products, Inc.

414 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1964

Accord, Chernetsky v. William Penn Stripping Co., 200 Pa. Superior Ct. 277 , 188 A. 2d 770 (1963) ; see Holt v. Sunray Electric, Inc., 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 594 , 142 A. 2d 509 (1958); Hollenbach v. … The board has not determined otherwise in this case.” Rutledge v. Daley’s Blue Line Transfer Co., 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 118, 122-23 , 31 A. 2d 366, 368 (1943).

Ventresca v. Exley

358 Pa. 98 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1947

Superior Ct. 599 ; Heubner v. Philadelphia Saving Fund Society, 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 28, 36 , 192 A. 139, 142 . … Clarke’s Appeal, 37 D. & C. 670, 677-679; Gheen v. Mencer, 52 D. & C. 422, 427).

Malone v. Keener

44 Pa. 107 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1862

The assignor owes the assignee, and that particular mode of paying him is adopted; he guarantees in substance his own debt: Browne on Stat. of Frauds, § 165. The cases of Browne v. Curtis, 2 Comstock 229, and Johnson v. … This belongs to the third class *110 of cases mentioned by Chief Justice Kent, in Leonard v. Yredenburgh, 8 Johns. 38 -9.

Commonwealth ex rel. Thomas v. Myers

419 Pa. 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1966

Sparks v. … Horne v. Pa. Board of Parole, 234 F. Supp. 368 .

Noble v. Police Beneficiary Ass'n

224 Pa. 298 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1909

American Legion of Honor, 168 Pa. 279 ; Brown v. Ancient Order of United Workmen, 208 Pa. 101 ; Supreme Conclave, Royal Adelphia, v. Cappella et ah, 41 Fed. Repr. 1. … In our state, in the recent case of Pennsylvania Railroad Company v.

Messinger v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

261 Pa. 336 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1918

Co. v. Winfield, 244 U. S. 147, 152 , and Erie R. R. Co. v. Winfield, 244 U. S. 170, 172 . … In McCauley v.

Ganaposki's Case

332 Pa. 550 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1938

of “wilful and persistent negligence” for which he may be dismissed. “. . . disobedience of reasonable orders of the Board of Education is an act of negligence” : Lyndall v. … The School Code provides that he must “teach” under the authority of the board; the refusal to do so is a di *556 rect violation of the Code and his contract: Ditty v.

Vonot v. Hudson Coal Co.

285 Pa. 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1926

In McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co., 261 Pa. 312 , certain procedural provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, P. … As to this, we need say only that the point is determined by us against appellant’s contention that such cumulation cannot legally be allowed, in a per curiam opinion to-day filed in the case of Sustar v.