Case law

In Re Benninghoff

578 Pa. 402 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 2004

We find the instant matter more analogous to the Commonwealth Court’s decision in Smith v. Brown, 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 304 , 590 A.2d 816 (1991). … denied Smith’s petition to set aside Brown’s nomination petition.

Toye v. Exeter Borough School District

225 Pa. 236 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1909

The board of directors had power under the Act of June 25, 1885, P. L. 175, to elect the plaintiff for a term of three years: Burke v. School District, 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 16 . … The rule thus laid down was repeated, and followed in McCrea v.

Foley Bros., Inc. v. Commonwealth

400 Pa. 584 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1960

To which need be added only questions of fraud and good faith on the part of the Board: Land Holding Corp. v. … This is particularly so since we consider the Board as a judicial tribunal: Kaufman Construction Co. v. Holcomb, supra, ( 357 Pa. 514 ); Merchants’ Warehouse Co. v.

Barrick v. Tennis

934 A.2d 1154 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2007

Cresson's Appeal

30 Pa. 437 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

These eases, and many others, are collected in Magill v. Brown, Bright. 347. It is true, the statute of Elizabeth is not in force as a statute in Pennsylvania, but its principles are a part of our *451 common law. … The case of Magill v. Brown was a Pennsylvania case, and there it was held that a bequest for a fire engine and hose was a gift for a charitable use. In 7 Johns.

Parks Superior Sales, Inc. v. Bureau of Prof'l & Occupational Affairs

184 A.3d 942 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2018

Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.

268 Pa. 163 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1920

could be examined in deciding the question of law before the court: McCauley v. … But where it concerns merely the mode of procedure, it is applied, as of course, to litigation existing at the time of its passage: Kille v. Reading Iron Works, 134 Pa. 225, 227 ; Lane v.

Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General Authority

593 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2007

Auth. v. … Compare Falls Township v. McManamon, 113 Pa.Cmwlth. 504, 508-09 , 537 A.2d 946, 947 (1988) (invalidating a holdover police-chief employment contract entered into by a lame-duck board of supervisors), and Moore v.

PA Dem Party. v. Boockvar Pet: Boockvar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2020

WILLIAMS : : : v. … BOARD : OF ELECTIONS; CARBON COUNTY : BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE : COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; : CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF : ELECTIONS; CLARION COUNTY BOARD : OF ELECTIONS; CLEARFIELD COUNTY : BOARD

Pittsburgh Railways Co. Substation Operators & Maintenance Employees' Case

357 Pa. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1947

v. … See Bethlehem Steel Company v. New York State Labor Relations Board, supra, 67 Sup. Ct. at 1030.

Harlan v. Harlan

15 Pa. 507 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1851

To the same effect is Brown v. Caldwell, 10 Ser. & R. 114. … The truth is, Powell v. Smith merely affirms the principle ruled in Mather v. The Trinity Church, Baker v. Howell, Brown v. Caldwell, and other kindred cases.

Susquehanna Collieries Company's Appeal

335 Pa. 337 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1939

Philadelphia et al., 314 Pa. 298 ; Philadelphia v. Kolb, 288 Pa. 359 ; Clark v. Burschell, 220 Pa. 435 ; Rockhill Iron & Coal Co. v. Fulton County, 204 Pa. 44 ; Moore v. … The failure of the county Boards of Revision to make proper records of their proceedings, has resulted ■ in confusion in many cases and has been commented on by the appellate courts. See Graham v.

Barrick v. Tennis

594 Pa. 44 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2007

Spann v. Joint Boards of School Directors

381 Pa. 338 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1955

al. v. … It is only where the board transcends the limits of its legal discretion that it is amenable to the injunctive processes of a court of equity: Detweiler v.

Bogadek v. Butkovic

336 Pa. 284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1939

Courts will not entertain jurisdiction unless all the remedies afforded by the by-laws have been exhausted : Maloney v. United Mine Workers of America, 308 Pa. 251, 257 ; Lodge No. 19 v. Svi Sveti, 323 Pa. 292 ; West v. … Union League, 135 Pa. 301, 327 ; Commonwealth v. Heilman, 241 Pa. 374, 378 ; Maloney v. United Mine Workers of America, 308 Pa. 251, 256, 257 ; Lodge No. 19 v. Svi Sveti; 323 Pa. 292 ; Raynovic v.

Commonwealth v. Cleary

148 Pa. 26 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1892

.” *38 In Com. v. … In Brown v.

Delaware County National Bank v. Campbell

378 Pa. 311 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1954

Ross, 343 Pa. 573 , 23 A. 2d 737 ; Newport Township School District v. State Tax Equalization Board, 366 Pa. 603 , supra. Cf. also: Grime v. Department of Public Instruction, 324 Pa. 371 , 188 A. 337 . … Appellees also cite Glen Alden Coal Co. v. State Tax Equalization Board, 367 Pa. 63 , 79 A. 2d 645 , as holding that certiorari will not lie from an order of an administrative board.

Stickney v. Chester County Communications, Ltd.

361 Pa. Super. 166 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1987

Hepps v. … See 6 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 1788-90 (1976); Brown, Pennsylvania Evidence, pp. 129-131 (1949).

Groen v. Mittman

464 Pa. 246 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1975

Ross v. Soles

1 Watts 43 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1832

This case falls directly within the principle decided by this court in Honiter v. Brown, 1 Penn. … this court reversed the judgment of the court below on this point, and decided that Honiter was entitled to recover back the costs of Brown, which he had so paid.