Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.44s
In re Anonymous No. 41 D.B. 82
14 Pa. D. & C.4th 451 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1991
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573 , 506 A.2d 872 (1986). … Brown and Hill did not participate.
Cited 0 timesPublished762 A.2d 1084 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 2000
Cited 0 timesPublished620 Pa. 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublishedSeitel Data, Ltd. v. Center Township
631 Pa. 295 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublished581 Pa. 107 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2004
The assailants did not physically harm Sonya Brown's brother, Daniel Brown, during the gruesome slayings of Evelyn and Tina Brown. … However, the resultant emotional trauma from witnessing the murders prohibited Daniel Brown from testifying at Appellant’s subsequent trial. . Miranda v.
Cited 66 timesPublished86 Pa. 524 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1878
It is shown that then, John Brown was largely indebted, and far beyond his ability to pay. … Except as against a bankrupt law, a debtor may prefer one creditor to another, and such preference -is not fraudulent either in law or in fact: Uhler v. Maulfair, 11 Harris 48; Hart v. Covenhoven, 9 Id. 327; Hopkins v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGrimm ex rel. Grimm v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.
189 A.3d 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublished75 Pa. D. & C.4th 211 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2005
V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that petitioner, Marlene Evelyn Joseph, be reinstated to the practice of law. … Board Member Curran did not participate in the matter. Board Members McLaughlin, Brown, Pietragallo and Nordenberg did not participate in the March 16, 2005 adjudication.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Anonymous No. 32 D.B. 83
14 Pa. D. & C.4th 136 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 1991
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573 , 506 A.2d 872 (1986); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [K], Nos. 4 and 35 D.B. 79, 5 D. … Brown and Hill did not participate in the adjudication.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPPG Industries v. BD. OF FINANCE & REVENUE
567 Pa. 565 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1999
This is a direct appeal from an order of the Commonwealth Court, affirming the order of the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board). 1 For the reasons that follow, we reverse. *568 Appellant, PPG Industries, Inc. … PPG sought review of the resettlement and the Board affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublished422 Pa. 424 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1966
Hensel Brown, John J. Stork, and Windolph, Burkholder & Hartman, and Brown & Zimmerman, and May, Grove & Stork, for appellees. *426 OPINION BY MR. … Justice FRANKFURTER in Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , at page 648.
Cited 449 timesPublished358 Pa. 474 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1948
Such certainly was never the intention of the legislature.’ ” See also Shenker v. Harr, Treasurer, et al., 332 Pa. 382 , 2 A. 2d 298 ; Morrison v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 141 Pa. … Brown Estate, 347 Pa. 244 , 32 A. 2d 22 ; Coyne Will, 349 Pa. 331 , 37 A. 2d 509; Brown, Admr., v. Monaca Federal Savings and Loan Association, 352 Pa. 1 , 42 A. 2d 50 ; Baldwin Will, 357 Pa. 432 .
Cited 17 timesPublished137 Pa. 18 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1890
bridge, which is substantially in the line of Brown street extended, was built there because, in 1870 or 1871, said public road was appropriated by the Mt. … If authority for this proposition be needed, it may be found in Burrell Tp. v. Uncapher, 117 Pa. 353, 354 ; Plymouth Tp. v. Graver, 125 Pa. 24 ; Corbalis v. Newberry Tp., 132 Pa. 9 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn re Assigned Estate of Haines & Co.
176 Pa. 354 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1896
While this distinction was admitted in Edwards v. … to the partners other than Wood and Brown.
Cited 3 timesPublished450 Pa. 391 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1973
As was aptly stated in Goodyear v. Brown, 155 Pa. 514 , 26 A. 665 (1893) : “. . . it does not follow that everything may be done by a public officer that is not forbidden in advance by some act of the assembly.” … McCreary v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
455 Pa. 52 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1973
We note additionally that the Commission’s view requiring maximum racial mixing corresponds to the remedy a federal court would order, after Brown v. Board of Education (1), 347 U.S. 483 , 98 L. … See Brief of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) in School Board of Richmond v. State Board of Bducation, U.S. Sup.
Cited 138 timesPublished118 Pa. 89 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1888
If unsuccessful — that is, if oil never reached $1.15 per barrel, the loss fell on Brown; if successful, Brown was to get his money back, with seven per cent, interest. … Co. v. Stichter, 11 W. N. 325. And see also Spain v. Hamilton, 1 Wall. 604 ; Corcoran’s Case, Idem 604. In Philip v.
Cited 4 timesPublished55 Pa. 85 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1867
That was enough for him; he was not bound to inquire of the tenant in possession if the lease was fair or fraudulent, or whether there was a trust notwithstanding: Sugd. on Vend. 339 ; Hood v. Fahnestock, 4 Barr 474. … It was Leach’s interest only that passed By the sale to Brown. The same interest Brown sold and conveyed to Anshacher, who paid Brown for it in full before any notice of claim by Leach was given.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna