Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.43s
504 Pa. 506 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1984
504 Pa. 506 (1984) 475 A.2d 741 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY (Appellant at No. 40) and Affiliated F.M.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBliss Excavating Co. v. Luzerne County
418 Pa. 446 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965
In Knup v. … Home Life Insurance Company of America v. Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 447, 453 , 143 A. 2d 21 (1958). In Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedSlice of Life, LLC v. Hamilton Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.
207 A.3d 886 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019
See also Lex v. … See Broussard v.
Cited 48 timesPublished474 Pa. 391 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1977
See also Woolfolk v. Brown, 538 F.2d 598 (4th Cir., 1976) (Virginia Work Rules not in substantial conflict with federal law could be applied to AFDC recipients not in work incentive areas.) … See and compare Batterton v.
Cited 2 timesPublished1 Serg. & Rawle 334 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1815
Rep. 302.) have been overruled in Nicholson v. Gouthit (2 H. Black. 609.) and Esdaile v. Sowerby, (11 East, 114.) The case of Jackson v. Richards (2 Caine’s T. … The house of James Brown '& Co. consisted of James Brown and Armat Brown. When the note fell due, James Brown was in Europe, and Armat Brown in this city.
Cited 14 timesPublished555 Pa. 397 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1999
See Commonwealth v. Morales, 549 Pa. 400, 409 , 701 A.2d 516, 520 (1997) (waiver will be excused under the PCRA if appellant makes proper claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Howard, 538 Pa. 86, 93, 645 A.2d 1300, 1304 (1994); Commonwealth v. Douglas, 537 Pa. 588, 597 , 645 A.2d 226, 230 (1994).
Cited 83 timesPublishedKatonka v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
170 A.3d 1043 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGrath v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs
166 A.3d 1216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2017
Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND : OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, STATE : BOARD
Cited 0 timesPublished382 Pa. 380 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1955
That rent and eviction controls are not unreasonable or arbitrary, and are valid exercises of this power, is established: Block v. Hirsh, 256 U. S. 135 ; Marcus Brown Holding Company v. Feldman, 256 *384 U. … It clearly acts in an administrative capacity only, as do zoning boards, and the exercise of these powers is not in violation of Article V, Section 1, of the Constitution. III.
Cited 42 timesPublishedDepolo v. Bd. of Supervisors of Tredyffrin Twp.
184 A.3d 144 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublished259 Pa. 306 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1918
In our opinion this is not a local or special law”: Swartz v. Carlisle Boro., 237 Pa. 473, 477 ; Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights, 83 N. J. L. 383, 886; State ex rel. Board of Education v. … Co. v. Riblet, 66 Pa. 164, 169 ; Likins’s Petition (No. 1), 223 Pa. 456, 459-60 ; Com. v. Hyneman, 242 Pa. 244, 246-7 . The numerous cases cited in State ex rel. Board of Education v.
Cited 11 timesPublished308 Pa. 520 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1932
Appellant quotes expressions of this court in Christian’s App., 102 Pa. 184 ; Stone v. Schiller B. & L. Assn., 302 Pa. 544 , 153 A. 758 ; and Brown v. … In Jackson v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedSkelton v. Lower Merion Township
318 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1935
L. 23: see Skelton v. Lower Merion Twp., 298 Pa. 471 . It was there argued that the appellant’s remedy was under the act relating to first-class townships before the board of auditors. … v.
Cited 30 timesPublished63 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1870
The declarations of one tenant in common cannot be given in evidence to impeach the title of his co-tenant: 1 Greenl. on Ev., § 176; Dun v. Brown, 4 Cowen 483. … Gilchrist, 3 Watts 230 ; Rogers v. Hall, 4 Id. 359 ; Irwin v. Keen, 3 Whart. 347 ; Peterson v. Speer, 5 Casey 478; McDowell v. Rissell, 1 Wright 164 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn re Anonymous No. 27 D.B. 90
17 Pa. D. & C.4th 12 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1991
Keller, Brown, Hill and Powell did not participate in the adjudication. … See also Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLewis v. Phila. Cnty. Bd. of Elections
195 A.3d 167 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublished315 Pa. 459 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1934
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna