Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.27s
Crosby v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
624 Pa. 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2014
Cited 0 timesPublished129 Pa. 94 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1889
Brown died about the month of August, 1885. … Insurance Co., 107 Pa. 31 ; Haws v. Association, 114 Pa. 431 .
Cited 34 timesPublished537 Pa. 350 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1994
Cited 10 timesPublished585 Pa. 171 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublishedCommonwealth ex rel. v. Scanlan
202 Pa. 250 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1902
Penn Township, 9 Pa. 79 , Blackmore v. County of Allegheny, 51 Pa. 160 , Township of Middletown v. Miles, 61 Pa. 290 , Godshalk v. Northampton County, 71 Pa. 324 , Siggins v. Commonwealth, 85 Pa. 278 , and Shartzer v. … After his account had been audited in 1897, no subsequent board of auditors could inquire into it: Godshalk v. Northampton County, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublished3 Rawle 95 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1831
the warrant, issued by the commissioners of the county to the collector, at which he was required to pay over the taxes collected by him to the treasurer, agreeably to the 15th section of the act already referred to, the board … Browne, for the prisoner, cited the Commonwealth v. Alexan der, 6 Binn. 176 . Dallas and T. Sergeant, for the Commonwealth, 3 Chitty Crim, Law, 338. 12 Serg. & Rawle, 348 . 1 Chitty Crim. Law, 39. Jacob’s L. D.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCom., Dep v. Cromwell Tp., Huntingdon Cty.
613 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2011
The ramifications of this unusual approach to enforcement proceedings are an aspect of the appeal currently pending in Department of Environmental Protection v. Township of Cromwell. Kristen W. Brown and Blair T. … Dunson v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDehoratius v. Upper Darby Twp.
187 A.3d 911 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublished217 Pa. 626 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1907
Justice Brown, The claim of the appellant which was disallowed was on a promissory note made by the decedent on August 9,1903, for $2,000, payable to her order one year after date, with interest. … The burden of rebutting consideration was upon the appellees: Conmey v. Macfarlane, 97 Pa. 361 . This they have not rebutted. The appellant, in rebuttal, needlessly called a witness, T. H.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCurry v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.
635 Pa. 777 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textCitizens for State Hospital v. Commonwealth
529 Pa. 2 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1992
Cited 2 timesPublishedBenchoff v. Pa. Dept. of Corr.
185 A.3d 979 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2018
This case echoes the concerns that I expressed in my dissenting statement in Brown v. … Brown , 177 A.3d at 209 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedCommonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. Schmid
333 Pa. 568 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1938
See Brown v. Russell, 166 Mass. 14 , 43 N. E. 1005 . In New York, though preferences for veterans have been written into the constitution, • nevertheless they have been construed against appointment without examination. … The civil service provisions relating to employees of the Liquor Control Board, the Housing Board, the Unemployment Compensation Board, and the Department of Public Assistance all give to veterans a percentage bonus in aid
Cited 59 timesPublishedBigley v. Unity Auto Parts, Inc.
496 Pa. 262 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1981
It is obvious that the remedial purposes of the Act, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Hartlieb, 465 Pa. 249 , 348 A.2d 746 (1975); Hamilton v. Procon, Inc., 434 Pa. 90 , 252 A.2d 601 (1969); Hartwell v. … The stated remedial purposes of the Act, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v.
Cited 20 timesPublished63 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1870
The declarations of one tenant in common cannot be given in evidence to impeach the title of his co-tenant: 1 Greenl. on Ev., § 176; Dun v. Brown, 4 Cowen 483. … Gilchrist, 3 Watts 230 ; Rogers v. Hall, 4 Id. 359 ; Irwin v. Keen, 3 Whart. 347 ; Peterson v. Speer, 5 Casey 478; McDowell v. Rissell, 1 Wright 164 .
Cited 3 timesPublished1 Serg. & Rawle 334 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1815
Rep. 302.) have been overruled in Nicholson v. Gouthit (2 H. Black. 609.) and Esdaile v. Sowerby, (11 East, 114.) The case of Jackson v. Richards (2 Caine’s T. … The house of James Brown '& Co. consisted of James Brown and Armat Brown. When the note fell due, James Brown was in Europe, and Armat Brown in this city.
Cited 14 timesPublished555 Pa. 397 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1999
See Commonwealth v. Morales, 549 Pa. 400, 409 , 701 A.2d 516, 520 (1997) (waiver will be excused under the PCRA if appellant makes proper claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Howard, 538 Pa. 86, 93, 645 A.2d 1300, 1304 (1994); Commonwealth v. Douglas, 537 Pa. 588, 597 , 645 A.2d 226, 230 (1994).
Cited 83 timesPublished538 Pa. 2 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1994
Commonwealth v. Holcomb, 508 Pa. 425 , 498 A.2d 833 (1985). In the instant case, the Commonwealth presented eyewitness testimony identifying appellant as Darren Brown’s killer. … Brown.
Cited 87 timesPublishedBliss Excavating Co. v. Luzerne County
418 Pa. 446 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965
In Knup v. … Home Life Insurance Company of America v. Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 447, 453 , 143 A. 2d 21 (1958). In Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v.
Cited 40 timesPublished
Ask Donna