Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

2.02s

  • Kerr v. Kerr

    216 Pa. 641 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1907

    Justice Brown, WiHiam'A. Kerr, the appellant, obtained a decree of absolute divorce from his wife, Rose O. Kerr, on the ground of her cruel and barbarous treatment of him. … The final settlement of the committee’s account is a decree in chancery, and is enforced by the usual remedies:” Vincent v. Watson, 40 Pa. 306 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re: Financial Institutions Approved as Depositories for Fiduciary Accounts

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2019

    567 Embassy Bank for the Lehigh Valley 5 BNY Mellon, NA 541 ENTERPRISE BANK 392 BRENTWOOD BANK 28 Ephrata National Bank 495 Brown … 600 Unity Bank 232 Univest Bank & Trust Co. 107 QNB Bank 560 Quaint Oak Bank Bank Code V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Warren Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Foley

    294 Pa. 176 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1928

    Rapp, 286 Pa. 29 ; Allen v. First National Bank of Warren, 127 Pa. 51 ; First National Bank of Pittston v. Lawall, 280 Pa. 407 ; First National Bank of Hooversville v. Sagerson, 283 Pa. 406 ; Brown v. Mt. … So far as appears, the board never acted in regard to the matter.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Page's Department Store v. Velardi

    464 Pa. 276 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1975

    Joseph Horne Company et al. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 15 Pa.Cmwlth. 419 , 327 A.2d 395 (1975); Weller Electric Corporation v. … See Dunlap v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 17 Pa.Cmwlth. 19 , 330 A.2d 555 (1975); Joseph Horne Co. et al. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board et al., 15 Pa.Cmwlth. 419 , 327 A.2d 395 (1974); Greene v.

    Cited 114 timesPublished
  • Matter of Sylvester

    521 Pa. 300 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1989

    STANDARD OF REVIEW We review de novo the record of the Board to determine whether the charges have been established by clear and convincing evidence. In re Judicial Inquiry and Review Bd. v. … The Board presented no witnesses. It did present seventeen exhibits. One of the exhibits included the six-volume transcript of the trial of United States v.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • Kirsch v. School District of Philadelphia

    761 A.2d 540 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2000

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burford v. McCue

    53 Pa. 427 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1867

    The Act of 3d of April 1792 regulates proceedings on caveats before the board of property, the effect of a decision by the board, and the time within which the losing party must institute ejectment before being barred by … In Strouch v. Shoemaker, 1 W. & S. 166 , this point is discussed and determined.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kirsch v. School District

    563 Pa. 345 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2000

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • TAX REVIEW BD. OF PHILA. v. Heintz Inv. Co.

    461 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

    The Commonwealth Court reversed the board and the Court of Common Pleas, and appellant sought allocatur, which we granted. , Appellant, relying on our decision in Tax Review Bd. v. … See Sun Oil Co. v. Tax Review Board, 417 Pa. 443 , 207 A.2d 855 (1965). Order of the Commonwealth Court affirmed in part and reversed in part. NIX, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Deiter Family, L.P. v. City of Easton Bldg. Code Bd. of Appeals

    138 A.3d 6 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Hernandez v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

    199 A.3d 883 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wrightsville Hardware Co. v. McElroy

    254 Pa. 422 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1916

    Chief Justice Brown, The Wrightsville Hardware Company is a Pennsylvania corporation, engaged in the manufacture of hardware at Wrightsville, this State. … Co., 196 Pa. 452 -467; Goldbeck v. Bank, 147 Pa. 267 ; Hartzell v. Ebbvale Mining Co., 239 Pa. 602 ; Pannebaker v. Tuscarora Val. R. R. Co., 219 Pa. 60 -64; Ramble v. Penna. Coal Co., 47 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 2 D.B. 86

    46 Pa. D. & C.3d 400 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1987

    Schwartzman, Curran, Mundy, Brown, Tumolo and Keller did not participate in the adjuciation. … It is further ordered that respondent shall pay costs to the disciplinary board pursuant to rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grogan v. Pennsylvania Railroad

    213 Pa. 340 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1906

    In MeGrew v. Stone, 53 Pa. 436 , Mr. … Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sapper v. Mathers

    286 Pa. 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1926

    Co. v. … Lingenfelter, 262 Pa. 500 , it is held, in an opinion by Chief Justice Brown, that a deed to a school board “for school purposes only” vests an estate in fee simple, with all mineral rights, and that the words in the deed

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Reese v. Danforth

    486 Pa. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1979

    Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A.2d 877 (1973). … See Mallen and *487 Levitt, Legal Malpractice § 175 (1977) discussing Minns v. Paul, 542 F.2d 899 (4th Cir. 1976); John v. Hurt, 489 F.2d 786 (7th Cir. 1973); Brown v. Joseph, 463 F.2d 1046 (3d Cir. 1972).

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Jian Li v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

    207 A.3d 909 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Commonwealth

    203 A.3d 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lampkin v. Commonwealth

    201 A.3d 734 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brynelson v. Turner-Forman Concrete Steel Co.

    239 Pa. 346 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1913

    Justice Brown, The appellant, a carpenter, was an employee of the appellee, and, in his action against it for its alleged negligence, nothing was shown except that, as he was descending on a ladder from an upper to a lower … the duty of the party or parties having charge of the construction of any new building hereafter erected in this Commonwealth, to have the joists or girders of each floor above the third story covered with rough scaffold boards

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.