Case law

Galizia v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

185 A.3d 280 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 2018

Garrard v. Pittsburgh & Connelsville Railroad

29 Pa. 154 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1857

Clark, 11 S. & R. 377; Kirkpatrick v. Muirhead, 4 Harris 123; Walker v. Geisse, 4 Wharton 258 ; Depeau v. Waddington, 6 Id. 220; Sidwell v. Evans, 1 Penna. Rep. 385; Tolsons v. Clerk, Cro. … Car. 438; Gill and Hairwood’s Case, 1 Leon. 61; Bay v. Coddington, 5 John. Ch. R. 54; Lutwich v. Hussey, Cro. Eliz. 19; Londsdale v. Brown, 4 W. C. C. R. 151.

Unger v. Pa. Department of Probation & Parole

22 A.3d 1032 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2011

Griffin v. Griffin

384 Pa. Super. 188 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1989

See, e.g., DeWalt v. DeWalt, 365 Pa.Super. at 287 , 529 A.2d at 512 ; Brown v. Brown, 327 Pa.Super. at 53 , 474 A.2d at 1169 ; Curtis v. Curtis, 326 Pa.Super. 40, 44 , 473 A.2d 597, 599 (1984); Lederer v. … DeWalt v. DeWalt, 365 Pa.Super. at 289 , 529 A.2d at 513 (citing Brown v. Brown, 327 Pa.Super. at 55 , 474 A.2d at 1170 ). As we explained in DeWalt : In Brown v.

Biosciences Information Service v. COMMONWEALTH BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE

524 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1990

524 Pa. 132 (1990) 569 A.2d 927 BIOSCIENCES INFORMATION SERVICE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 26, 1990.

Philadelphia Ret. Liq. Deal. v. Pa. Liq. Bd.

360 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1948

The case was tried together with a similar suit by other plaintiffs (Jacob Stern et al. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board). … In Commonwealth v.

Gray v. Waln

2 Serg. & Rawle 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1816

As to freight, it is due pro rata according to the principles laid down by this Court in *257 Armroyd v. The Union Insurance Company, and Callender v. … Leavenworth v. Delafield. 1 Caines, 373.

Logan v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

204 A.3d 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2019

Commonwealth v. Empowerment Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District

939 A.2d 324 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2007

This court’s affirmance of the Commonwealth Court’s order dated April 16, 2007 by opinion and Order at Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dep’t of Education v. … Therefore, the Special Board of Control of the Chester-Upland School District is no longer a party to this appeal. See, e.g., Blackwell v.

In re Merlo

619 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2012

The Board next presented evidence regarding a landlord/tenant case, Alcaro v. … Finally, in Brown , the Board withdrew the charges alleging violations of Section 18(d)(1).

Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.

270 Pa. 299 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1921

Justice (later Chief Justice) Brown, in Bornscheuer v. Traction Co., 198 Pa. 332 , 334: “In Carroll v. P. B. R. Co., 12 W. N. … Co. v.

United States Tobacco Co. v. Commonwealth

478 Pa. 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1978

On August 13, 1974, the Resettlement Board denied appellant’s petition for resettlement. The Board of Finance and Review subsequently sustained the settlement, as did the Commonwealth Court. United States Tobacco Co. v. … Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450 , 79 S.Ct. 357 , 3 L.Ed.2d 421 (1959), and denied certiorari in Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v.

Hoffman v. Commonwealth

422 Pa. 144 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1966

The only reason urged in support of the argument of excessiveness is that the jury awards were greater than those given by the board. Such a disparity is not, in itself, grounds for a new trial. See, Brown & Vaughn Dev. … Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com., 293 Pa. 326 , 142 A. 867 (1928), and Sutton v. Penna. Railroad Co., 214 Pa. 274 , 63 A. 791 (1906).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher

70 Pa. D. & C.4th 344 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2004

. *346 Oral argument was held on February 26,2004, before a three-member panel of the Disciplinary Board chaired by Robert E J. Curran, Esquire, with Members C. Eugene McLauglin and Laurence H. Brown, Esquire. … Board Members Stewart, Teti, Rudnitsky, Saidis, Peck, Newman and O’Connor dissented and would recommend a one year and one day suspension. Board Member Brown did not participate in the March 10, 2004 adjudication.

Johnson v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

188 A.3d 395 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2018

Ruby, Exr. v. Penn Fibre Bd. Corp.

326 Pa. 582 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1937

Justice Stern, Defendant company was incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1920 for the manufacture and sale of paper, paper board and kindred products. … The law contents itself *586 with the statement that the examination should be made at a “reasonable” or “proper” time and place: Kuhbach v. Irving Cut Glass Co., 220 Pa. 427, 432, 433 ; Hauser v.

Commonwealth v. Dickey

262 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1918

Chief Justice Brown, This appeal is from the refusal of a writ of mandamus to compel the commissioners of Clinton County to rebuild a bridge Yfhich was swept away by a flood in 1913. … Lawrence County, 198 Pa. 1 ; Commonwealth v. Baker, 212 Pa. 230 ; Commonwealth v. Bowman, 218 Pa. 330 .

Lindemuth v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

145 A.3d 729 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2016

Hall v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

145 A.3d 729 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2016

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council 84

515 Pa. 23 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 1987

In Sweet v. … Bradley v.