Case law

Ex rel. Barbara Bryant Foreign Estate v. City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions & Retirement

631 Pa. 611 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 2015

Collins v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

183 A.3d 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2018

PA Gaming Control Brd, Aplt. v. OOR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 2014

Cozzone v. W.C.A.B. (PA Municipal/East Goshen Twp.), 73 A.3d 526 (Pa. 2013). … Board of Revision of Taxes, City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia, 4 A.3d 610, 622 (Pa. 2010) (citation omitted).

Riggio v. Burns

739 A.2d 161 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1999

In re Anonymous No. 12 D.B. 79

39 Pa. D. & C.3d 283 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1986

V. RECOMMENDATIONS The Disciplinary Board recommends to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as follows: 1. That petitioner, [ ], be readmitted to the practice of law. 2. … Curran, McGinley, Mundy and Brown and Ms. Heh did not participate in this adjudication.

Chandley Bros. v. Cambridge Springs Borough

200 Pa. 230 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1901

In Connor v. Simpson, 104 Pa. 440 , the chief engineer was given full power to decide every question that might or could arise between the parties relative to the execution of the work; and, in Brown v. … In O’Reilly v.

Stoner v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

439 Pa. 333 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1970

See Snyder v. Commonwealth, 412 Pa. 15 , 192 A. 2d 650 (1963) ; Brown & Vaughn Development Co. v. Commonwealth, 393 Pa. 589 , 143 A. 2d 815 (1958); and Fisher v. Allegheny County, 324 Pa. 471 , 188 Atl. 196 (1936). … . §1-703(3)) Accordingly, the parties may present a case at trial which de *337 viates considerably from that put before the Board of Viewers.

Pennsylvania State University v. County of Centre

532 Pa. 142 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1992

See also Brush v. Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees, 249 Pa.Super. 164, 182-84 , 375 A.2d 810, 819 (1977) (Opinion in Support of Reversal). 5 . Mooney v. … . § 66.1 et seq.f, and Brush v.

Freedman v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

145 A.3d 729 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2016

Hinchman v. Graham

2 Serg. & Rawle 170 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1815

In the case of Wallace v. Melchior, in the District, Court, 2 Browne 104, the lumber merchant held his lien, al..though the lumber was not used in the building. That, I think, was right. … The latter ground of objection is directly opposed to the charge of the Court in Wallace v.

Cline v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

226 Pa. 586 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1910

Justice Brown, The appellee boarded a car of the appellant on the evening of May 26, 1907. … Railroad Co., 118 Pa. 508 ; nor does an accident befalling a passenger while on board a train and in the course of his journey, unless it is connected in some way with the means of transportation: McKinney v. The Penna.

Commonwealth v. Far

616 Pa. 149 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2012

Commonwealth v. Perry, 32 A.3d 232, 236 (Pa.2011). … Williams, supra; Commonwealth v. Sloan, 589 Pa. 15 , 907 A.2d 460, 465 (2006) (citing 1 Pa.C.S. § 1921); see also Commonwealth v.

Bowser v. J. C. Penney Co.

354 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1945

The first you could tell there were new boards because they weren’t as dark in color as the other boards were, and this Microshene was shining and waxy. It had sort of a greasy wax on it ... Q. … It left a yellOAvish, brown glossy, waxy mark.” On cross-examination she testified: “Q. What Avas the condition at that spot? A. There Avas a Avaxy, glossy finish in the area where I fell. Q. How large was that area? A.

Waddell v. Shriber

465 Pa. 20 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1975

Brown v. Gilligan Will & Co., 287 F.Supp. 766 (S.D.N.Y.1968). Rust v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 715 (S.D.N.Y.1972); Legg, Mason & Co. v. Mackall & Coe, 351 F.Supp. 1367 (D.D.C.1972). … Brown v. Gilligan Will & Co., 287 F.Supp. 766 (S. D.N.Y.1972). 3 *28 A more difficult question is whether the controversy presented by this case “falls within the scope of the arbitation provision.” Flightways Cory. v.

Koehler v. St. Mary's Brewing Co.

228 Pa. 648 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1910

Justice Brown, On December 22, 1908, the Elk County Brewing Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, proposed to the St. … Berry, 8 Howard, 544 ; Huthmacher v. Harris’s Admrs., 38 Pa. 491 ; Bigley v. Risher & Wilson, 63 Pa. 152 .

Girard Clarification Petition

423 Pa. 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1966

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 ." ( Pennsylvania v. Board of Trusts, 353 U.S. 230 ). (Emphasis supplied). … According to the complaint filed in Commonwealth v. Brown, 260 F.

Selheimer v. Manganese Corp. of America

423 Pa. 563 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1966

In our view, the court en bane has misinterpreted Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., supra. … Brown-Borhek Co., and Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 61 F. Supp. 905 (E.D. Pa.) (1945). We shall discuss, infra, the former.

Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.

455 Pa. 392 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1974

The drainage plan provided for discharge into Little Brown’s Run, which empties into Brown’s Run, am> '"-entually into the West Branch of the Susquehanna River. … Chidsey v.

Watson v. Witkin

343 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1941

We reiterated that in Com. v. Provident Trust Co., 287 Pa. 251 . In Chew Heong v. United States, 112 U. … This court held in Derringe v.

Pottsville Bank v. Minersville Water Co.

211 Pa. 566 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1905

Garretson v. Brown, 185 Pa. 447 , was a case in which the opinion of the master was affirmed by this court. … Waugh, 101 Pa. 233 ; Siegfried v. Ludwig, 102 Pa. 547; Campbell v. Floyd, 153 Pa. 84 ; Jutte v. Hutchinson, 189 Pa. 218 .