Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.18s

  • Gamble v. Central Pennsylvania Lumber Co.

    225 Pa. 288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1909

    They were not called upon to satisfy themselves as to the accuracy of this return: Brown v. Hays, 66 Pa. 229 . … In Everhart v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Sokolic

    66 Pa. D. & C.4th 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 2003

    Philadelphia Newspapers Inc. v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court, 468 Pa. 382 , 363 A.2d 779 (1976). … For these reasons the board recommends that the petition for reinstatement be granted. V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that petitioner, Stephen E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chandley Bros. v. Cambridge Springs Borough

    200 Pa. 230 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1901

    In Connor v. Simpson, 104 Pa. 440 , the chief engineer was given full power to decide every question that might or could arise between the parties relative to the execution of the work; and, in Brown v. … In O’Reilly v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    183 A.3d 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schofield v. Turner

    213 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1906

    Justice Brown, • A misapprehension of what was decided in Swearingen v. Dairy Company, 198 Pa. 68 , is doubtless responsible for this *549 appeal. … In Eichman v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

    184 A.3d 547 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCormick's Contested Election

    281 Pa. 281 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1924

    Co. v. Browne, 206 Pa. 543, 548 ; Com. v. Alderman, 275 Pa. 483, 488, 489 . Then, section 11 of the Act of May 19, 1874, P. … Kramer, 271 Pa. 189, 194, 195 ; Gail v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Kellams v. PUB. SCH. EMP. RETIREMENT BD.

    486 Pa. 95 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1979

    Ervin v. City of Pittsburgh, supra ; Banks v. … For, as stated in Brown v. Richardson, 395 F.Supp. 185, 190 (W.D.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schwartz v. Phila. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment Sheldon Schwartz

    141 A.3d 483 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Wilson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    181 A.3d 1122 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pa. HR Comm. v. Chester Hous. Auth.

    458 Pa. 67 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1974

    Crow v. Brown, 332 F. Supp. 382 (N.D. … Lee v. Nyquist, 318 F. Supp. 710 (W.D.N.Y. 1970), aff'd, 402 U.S. 935 , 91 S. Ct. 1618 (1971). See also Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, 413 U.S. 189 , 93 S. Ct. 2686 (1973); Brown v. Board of Educ., 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shannon v. Early F. Co.

    296 Pa. 141 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1929

    In Sotter v. … See also Lowman v. Pierce Co., 276 Pa. 382, 386 ; Browne v. Maxwell, 288 Pa. 398, 404 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bechtel v. Fry

    217 Pa. 591 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1907

    Justice Brown, On December 23, 1905, two of the commissioners of the county of Berks issued to the appellant a warrant upon the county treasurer, payable to his order, for $2,200. … Bressler (which ought to have been, as appears in the sixth averment of the return, Commonwealth v. F. F.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Colon v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    201 A.3d 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowser v. J. C. Penney Co.

    354 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1945

    The first you could tell there were new boards because they weren’t as dark in color as the other boards were, and this Microshene was shining and waxy. It had sort of a greasy wax on it ... Q. … It left a yellOAvish, brown glossy, waxy mark.” On cross-examination she testified: “Q. What Avas the condition at that spot? A. There Avas a Avaxy, glossy finish in the area where I fell. Q. How large was that area? A.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Carville v. A. F. Bornot & Co.

    288 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1926

    Co., 207 Pa. 217, 218 ; Brophy v. Am. Brewing Co., 211 Pa. 596, 597 ; Althouse v. Cobaugh Colliery Co., 227 Pa. 580, 582 ; Wilson v. Brown, 269 Pa. 225, 227 ]. … On the other hand, defendant contends that the conclusion reached by the court below involved matters of law, and, therefore, it was not obliged to return the record to the board. Prior to Vorbnoff v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Von Dehn v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

    195 A.3d 849 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. State Conference of State Police Lodges of the Fraternal Order of Police

    513 Pa. 285 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1987

    See, Philadelphia Fire Officers Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 470 Pa. 550 , 369 A.2d 259 (1977). … See, Petition of Acchione, 425 Pa. 23 , 227 A.2d 816 (1967); Barlow v. Collins, 397 U.S. 159 , 90 S.Ct. 832 , 25 L.Ed.2d 192 (1970); Schwartz, Administrative Law, §§ 217-218 (Little, Brown & Company, 1976).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mackley v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

    192 A.3d 1111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • East Torresdale Civic Association v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

    508 Pa. 614 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1985

    508 Pa. 614 (1985) 499 A.2d 1064 EAST TORRESDALE CIVIC ASSOCIATION v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Appeal of James FLANNERY. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 21, 1985.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.