Case law

In re Anonymous No. 88 D.B. 86

9 Pa. D. & C.4th 293 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1987

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court: BROWN, Member, Pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement and the order of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the following report is hereby … Brown, Esq., 515 Court Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, a member of the Disciplinary Board, appointed as a reviewing member for the purpose of initially receiving such report.

QUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Heidelberg Township

594 Pa. 2 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2007

Pennsylvania, with instructions to the Court of Common Pleas to consider whether upon motion of Petitioners, the statutory appeal at No. 05-4461 should be opened on the basis of after-discovered evidence, see Brannagan v.

In re Anonymous No. 71 D. B. 85

47 Pa. D. & C.3d 604 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1987

Schwartzman, Curran, Mundy, Brown, Tumolo and Keller did not participate in the adjudication. … Justice Papadakos dissent and would accept the recommendation of the disciplinary board.

Gloeckner v. Baldwin Township School District

405 Pa. 197 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1961

In Thomas v. … In the case of Wilmore Coal Co. v. Brown, 147 F. 931 , the lessee-defendant did nothing for some 25 years.

Lake Lehman School District v. Cigarski

494 Pa. 119 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1981

Therefore, for the reasons set forth in Warwick Board of School Directors v. … See Walker v.

Walters v. American Bridge Co.

234 Pa. 7 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1912

Justice Brown, The accident which resulted in the injury to the plaintiff below was a peculiar one. … Contracts for public works are within the rule: Painter v. Pittsburg, 46 Pa. 213 ; Erie v. Caulkins, 85 Pa. 247 ; Susquehanna Boro. v. Simmons, 112 Pa. 384 .

Riggio v. Burns

559 Pa. 108 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1999

Pollock v. Standard Steel Car Co.

230 Pa. 136 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1911

Justice Brown, Appellant’s claim against the appellee is for commissions alleged to be due on a sale of 300 of its cars to the George’s Creek Coal & Iron Company. … Burbank, 64 Pa. 247 ; Twelfth Street Market Co. v. Jackson, 102 Pa. 269 ; Merrick Thread Co. v. Phila. Shoe Mfg. Co., 115 Pa. 314 ; Zoebisch v. Rauch, 133 Pa. 532 .

Gonser v. Smith

115 Pa. 452 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1887

In Lee v. Keys, 88 Pa., 175 , we held, following Jamison v. … This case has since been followed by Brown v. Dempsey, 14 Nor., 243, so that we may regard it as established that this court will not reinvestigate the facts as found by the judicial referee.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. Cain

345 Pa. 581 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1942

Brown, 167 Mass. 144 , 45 N. E. 1 ; Wallace v. State, 91 Neb. 158 , 135 N. W. 549 ; Ex parte Marlow, 75 N. J. L. 400, 68 A. 171 ; State v. Peters, 43 Ohio St. 629 , 4 N. E. 81 ; Woods v. State, 130 Tenn. 100 , 169 S. … Page, 60 Kan. 664 , 57 P. 514 ; Board of Prison Commissioners v. DeMoss, 157 Ky. 289 , 163 S. W. 183 ; Ex parte Marlow, 75 N. J. L. 400, 68 A. 171 ; People v. Adams, 176 N. V. 351, 68 N. E. 636 ; State v.

Joint Bargaining Committee of the Pennsylvania Social Services Union v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

503 Pa. 236 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1983

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 502 Pa. 7, 11-12 , 463 A.2d 409, 411 , (1983); St. Joseph’s Hospital v. … See also, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Knight v. Allegheny County

371 Pa. 484 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1952

The Board of Viewers awarded $8,200 as compensation for these damages. Plaintiffs appealed from this award to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. … Brown said.” This was asking the jury to single out Mr.

Walker v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ.(et Al.)

380 Pa. 228 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1955

Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia, 357 Pa. 428, 429 , 54 A. 2d 829 ; Triolo v. … Power, 376 Pa. 175, 181 , 101 A. 2d 914, 916 ; Gish v. Exley, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 653, 655 , 34 A. 2d 925, 926 ; Deane v. Edgeworth Borough Board of Adjustment, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 502, 505 , 94 A. 2d 112, 113 .

Commonwealth v. Bubnis

197 Pa. 542 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1901

Justice Brown, By the first assignment of error we are asked to reverse the judgment of the court below because the venue as laid was not proved. … When he exceeds this limit, and in hot zeal seeks to influence them by appealing to their prejudices, he is no longer an impartial officer, but becomes a heated partisan: ” Com. v. Nicely, 130 Pa. 261 .

Commonwealth v. Butler

458 Pa. 289 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1974

In other words, a minimum sentence serves to notify the Board when it may exercise its discretion to parole an individual. Cf. Commonwealth ex rel. Hendrickson v. … Kanowitz, Sex Roles in Law and Society (1973); Brown, Emerson, Falk, & Freedman, The Equal Rights Amendment: A Constitutional Basis for Equal Rights for Women, 80 Yale L.J. 871 (1971).

Shabara v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

203 A.3d 205 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2019

Bradford Township Taxpayers Protective Ass'n v. McKean County Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes

370 Pa. 468 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1952

In Wynnefield United Presbyterian Church v. City of Philadelphia et al., 348 Pa. 252 , 35 A. 2d 276 , Mr. … Co. v.

Moss v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

204 A.3d 931 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2019

The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole's Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is DENIED .

Kraft v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

201 A.3d 721 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 2019

Foley v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

201 A.3d 725 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 2019