Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.99s
Frees v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
138 A.3d 6 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text5125 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment
417 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1965
Bd. of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 213 , 209 A. 2d 397 (1965), McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Bd. of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 234 , 209 A. 2d 389 (1965), Rieck Ice Cream Co. … Appeal, 417 Pa. 249 , 209 A. 2d 383 (1965), and Pittsburgh Miracle Mile Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc. v. Bd. of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 243 , 209 A. 2d 394 (1965). Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCommonwealth ex rel. Jefferson v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole
400 Pa. 593 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1960
Little v. Keenan, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 125 , 78 A. 2d 27 (1951)), and its legal correctness is not challenged herein. … It is not sought herein to compel the Board of Parole to correct its records or an erroneous computation of time to be served as contemplated in Commonwealth ex rel. Salerno v. Banmiller, 189 Pa.
Cited 0 timesPublished552 Pa. 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 1998
The Unions rely upon Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board v. Steve Black, 27 Pa.Cmwlth. 21 , 365 A.2d 685 (1976) in support of their argument. We believe that reliance upon Steve Black is simply misplaced. … McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc., 475 Pa. 610 , 613 n. 4, 381 A.2d 441 , 443 n. 4 (1977).
Cited 29 timesPublished115 Pa. 501 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1887
That the Board of Property made a mistake in awarding the patent to the defendants, we have no doubt, for the fee to the body of the land in controversy was clearly in the plaintiffs. … Moreover, according to the case of French v.
Cited 2 timesPublished633 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DANIEL LOUIS PILGRIM, No. 118 MM 2015 Petitioner v. MS. KIMBERLY A. … BARKLEY, BOARD SECRETARY AND THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondents ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2015, the Application
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrank N. Shaffer Family Ltd. Partnership v. Zoning Hearing Board of Chanceford Township
605 Pa. 267 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2010
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpangler Brewing Co. v. McHenry
242 Pa. 522 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1914
“V. … V. Railroad Co. v. P. & R. Railroad Co., 160 Pa. 277 .
Cited 23 timesPublished353 Pa. 514 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1946
county board made such a comparison. … In West Mahanoy Township’s Contested Election, 258 Pa. 176, 179 , Chief Justice Brown, speaking for this court said: “For mere irregularities in conducting an election it is not to be held void, even though the election officers
Cited 13 timesPublishedYoung v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
200 A.3d 5 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 2019
The issue, rephrased for clarity, is: May the Board of Probation and Parole retroactively revoke previously-awarded credit for time served while an individual is at liberty on parole pursuant to 61 Pa.C.S. § 6138(a)?
Cited 2 timesPublished4 Yeates 215 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1805
The case of Nicholas’s lessee v. … B., the above “ survey takes “off part of the tract surveyed for Joseph Brown.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedDarin Unemployment Compensation Case
398 Pa. 259 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1960
Justice Clark in Slochower v. Board of Education, 350 U. S. 551 (1956), 76 S. … Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591, 610 [ 16 S. Ct. 644, 652 , 40 L. Ed. 819 ]. We have reaffirmed our faith in this principle recently in Quinn v. United States, 349 U. S. 155 [ 75 S. Ct. 668 , 99 L. Ed. 964 ].
Cited 2 timesPublishedPennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Chester Housing Authority
458 Pa. 67 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1974
Crow v. Brown, 332 F. Supp. 382 (N.D. … Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S. Ct. 686 (1954). Other jurisdictions have upheld policies designed to eradicate de facto segregation in public schools. See, e.g., Guida v. Board of Educ., 26 Conn.
Cited 28 timesPublished547 Pa. 600 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1997
Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., 26 Ohio St.3d 15, 20 , 496 N.E.2d 959, 963-64 (1986). … Smith v. Brown-Borhek Co., 414 Pa. 325, 333 , 200 A.2d 398, 401 (1964) (emphasis in original), quoting Hunt v. Aufderheide, 330 Pa. 362, 376-77 , 199 A. 345 (1938).
Cited 62 timesPublishedChambers v. Beaver-Advance Corp.
392 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 1958
The general rule is well established that stockholders can ratify any action of the board of directors which they themselves could have lawfully authorized: Russell v. … For this proposition he cites the following cases: Wilson v. Brown, 269 Pa. 225 , 112 A. 112 (1920); Althouse v. Cobaugh Colliery Co., 227 Pa. 580 , 76 A. 316 (1910); Martindale v.
Cited 22 timesPublished217 Pa. 411 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1907
He also cites an apt statement from 8 Tomlin’s Brown, 72, quoted and approved by this court in Everhart v. Searle, 71 Pa. 256 , as follows : “No man can serve two masters. … And in Marshall v.
Cited 11 timesPublished434 Pa. 331 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1969
Grange Zoning Case, 397 Pa. 67 , 152 A. 2d 768 (1959). 4 Andress v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 410 Pa. 77, 88 , 188 A. 2d 709 (1963); Di Santo v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 410 Pa. 331, 336 , 189 A. 2d 135 (1963); Poster Advertising Co. v.
Cited 48 timesPublishedWright v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
141 A.3d 484 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text296 Pa. 48 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1929
Justice Brown, speaking for the court in Stinson’s Estate, 232 Pa. 218, 224 , which holds that a direct interest (similar to that held by Judge Broomall in the instant case) disqualified the witness and avoided the legacy … That a corporation is bound by the acts of its de facto officers, see Zearfoss v. F. & M. Institute, 154 Pa. 449 ; Zion Church v. Light, 7 Pa. Superior Ct. 223 ; 8 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law (2 ed.) 775.
Cited 8 timesPublishedFraternal Order of Police Star Lodge No. 20 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
522 Pa. 149 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1989
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna