Case law

In re Anonymous No. 4 D.B. 76

45 Pa. D. & C.3d 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1986

The report of the hearing committee was considered by the disciplinary board December 9, 1985. … McGinley, Douglas and Brown did not participate in the adjudication. ORDER NIX, C.

Caernarvon Township (Berks County) Zoning Hearing Board v. Commonwealth Human Relations Commission

842 A.2d 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 2004

Culver v. Pocono Spring Water Ice Co.

206 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1903

Justice Brown, On October 19, 1898, M. B. Culver entered into a written contract with the Pocono Spring Water Ice Company for the erection of a boarding house for its employees. … Miller had been in the habit of acting as the business agent of the company, with its knowledge and without objection, actual authority might be inferred from his acts, and the company would be bound by them: Dougherty v.

Spinelli v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (The Vanguard Group)

579 Pa. 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 2004

case to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to reconsider the issue of notice under 77 P.S. § 681 in light of City of Philadelphia v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Williams), 851 A.2d 838 (Pa.2004) and Sell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (LNP Engineering), 565 Pa. 114 , 771 A.2d 1246 (2001).

Independent State Store Union v. Commonwealth

614 Pa. 506 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2012

Trosky v. Civil Service Commission

539 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1995

Degler McMeekin Brown Mihalow 8. Degler McMeekin Mihalow Cygrymus 9. … Citing McGrath v.

Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

207 A.3d 292 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

Appellant was a part-time employee at Brown's Shop Rite beginning on February 14, 2013. N.T. 9/24/14 at 4. … Additionally, the Board argued Chamberlain v.

Lowman v. Harvey R. Pierce Co.

276 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1923

Brown, 269 Pa. 225 ; Glenn v. Kittanning Brewing Co., 259 Pa. 510 ; Com. Title, etc., Co. v. Seltzer, 227 Pa. 410 . … Assn. v. Taylor, 99 Va. 208 , 37 S.

Pittsburgh Joint Stock Yards Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review

353 Pa. 135 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1945

Justice Patteeson, Pittsburgh Joint Stock Yards Company, appellant, took an appeal to the court below from tax assessments upon its land and buildings by the Board of Property Assessment of Allegheny County, the City of Pittsburgh … In Pittsburgh, Allegheny & McKees Rocks Railway Company v.

Bolus v. Jefferson Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.

207 A.3d 291 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2019

Fisher Et Ux. v. Allegheny County

324 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1936

In the case of Regina et al. v. … This court in Rif et ux. v.

Dill v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

207 A.3d 287 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2019

West Mifflin Area School District v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review

570 Pa. 487 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2002

Department of Labor & Industry Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

604 Pa. 685 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2009

Jenkins v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

205 A.3d 1231 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 2019

Johnson v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

197 A.3d 1175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2018

Excelsior Saving Fund & Loan Ass'n v. Fox

253 Pa. 257 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1916

This was said in the very early case of Hurst’s Lessee v. Kirkbride, 1 Binney 616, (Wallace v. Baker, 1 Binney 610), and the doctrine of that case was so repeatedly recognized thereafter, that in Greenawalt v. … A recent very thorough discussion of this subject by our Brother Brown in the case of Gandy v. Weckerly, 220 Pa. 285 , makes further comment here unnecessary.” The same rule was again approved in Potter v.

Southwark National Bank v. Mount Holly National Bank

288 Pa. 491 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1927

Justice Frazer, This case arose out of transactions between plaintiff and defendant similar to those existing in Brown Brothers & Co. v. Mt. Holly National Bank, an opinion in which case is filed herewith. … , were questions of fact, and among the findings of the trial judge are the following: (a) “Neither the assistant cashier nor the cashier of the defendant was authorized by the defendant, or by its discount committee or board

Southwark N. Bk. v. Mt. Holly N. Bk.

288 Pa. 491 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1926

This case arose out of transactions between plaintiff and defendant similar to those existing in Brown Brothers Co. v. Mt. Holly National Bank, an opinion in which case is filed herewith. … , were questions of fact, and among the findings of the trial judge are the following: (a) "Neither the assistant cashier nor the cashier of the defendant was authorized by the defendant, or by its discount committee or board

Rossa ex rel. Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)

570 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2002

Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues: 1) Whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge has authority to determine paternity. 2) If such authority exists, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Minnich v.