Case law

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Czmus

586 Pa. 22 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2005

Commonwealth v. Stern, 549 Pa. 505 , 701 A.2d 568 (1997); Wajert v. State Ethics Comm’n, 491 Pa. 255 , 420 A.2d 439 (1980). … Respondent attended Brown University School of Medicine from 1974 to 1977 and was conferred a Degree in Medicine on June 6,1977. 7.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. Major

343 Pa. 355 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1941

We said in Mamlin v. … See also Reckner v. German Twp. S. D., 341 Pa. 375 ; Parrish v. Town of Adel, 144 Ga. 242 , 86 S. E. 1095 ; Hornung v. State ex rel. Gamble, 116 Ind. 458 , 19 N. E. 151 ; State v.

Pennsylvania State Building & Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Board

570 Pa. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 2002

The Commonwealth Court consolidated the appeals, and affirmed the Board’s order. *101 Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. … Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Board, 767 A.2d 605, 608-9 .

Commonwealth v. Rush

277 Pa. 419 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1923

Superior Ct. 613 ; Com. v. Brown, 66 Pa. Superior Ct. 519 . A transcript of the statements, prepared within a reasonable time, could be used to refresh the recollection of the one called: Com. v. … Superior Ct. 253 ; see also, Brown v. Com., 73 Pa. 321 ), though not an appointed court officer: Com. v. Ryhal, 274 Pa. 401 .

United States Steel Mining Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

845 A.2d 793 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2004

As Petitioner filed the petition for modification of benefits within the period of eligibility for compensation for partial disability, upon remand, the Commonwealth Court shall apply the standard enunciated in Dillon v. … See Stanek v. WCAB (Greenwich Collieries), 562 Pa. 411, 422-23 , 756 A.2d 661, 667 (2000).

Cook v. Stutzman

1 Monag. 753 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1888

American Body Care v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kmart Corp. & Sedgwick Management Services)

166 A.3d 1231 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2017

American Body Care v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kmart Corp. & Sedgwick Management Services)

166 A.3d 1231 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2017

White v. Provident Life & Trust Co.

237 Pa. 375 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1912

Y. 19 ; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 213 U. S. 25 , and Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Trust Co., 100 Pa. 172 . The first of these, Graeff v. … In the case of Equitable Life Assurancé Society v. Brown, 213 U.

Western New York & Pennsylvania Railway Co. v. Vulcan Foundry & Machine Co.

251 Pa. 383 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1916

Brown and A. B. Berger. … Co. v. Peet, 152 Pa. 488 ; Conwell v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 241 Pa. 172 . The remaining question for discussion relates to the proper parties plaintiff.

Henry Taylor Lumber Co. v. Carnegie Institute

225 Pa. 486 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1909

Justice Brown, By the Act of April 23,' 1903, P. … In Market Company v.

Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

619 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2012

The Board appealed the decision of the Commonwealth Court to this Court. … Department of Labor & Industry v.

Baker v. Retirement Bd. of Allegheny Co.

374 Pa. 165 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1953

The appellant here cites Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. … This vested right was part of their salaries as constitutional officers (Busser v.

In re Anonymous No. 46 D.B. 84

39 Pa. D. & C.3d 234 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1986

On January 9, 1984, respondent entered a plea of guilty to the offense of resisting arrest in violation of N.J.S. 2C:29-2 in the matter of The State of New Jersey v. … Brown, Curran, McGinley and Mundy did not participate in the adjudication.

Temperance Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Home Friendly Society

187 Pa. 38 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1898

That this could not be done is too clear to admit of doubt: Lauman v. Lebanon Valley R. R. Co., 30 Pa. 42 ; Bedford, etc., R. R. Co. v. Bowser, 48 Pa. 29 ; Balliet v. Brown, 103 Pa. 554 . … The purpose was to transfer the entire membership and property of one corporation to another, and it was attempted to effect this by the action of the board of directors alone.

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth

615 Pa. 590 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2011

The Motion to Strike Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board’s Reply Brief or in the Alternative Permit OAG to File Sur-Reply Brief is denied. Chief Justice CASTILLE files a Dissenting Statement.

Pa. State Police v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

184 A.3d 958 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 2018

In holding that the employer was entitled to subrogation, the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board ("Board"), relying on Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. … Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bushta) , --- Pa. ----, 168 A.3d 1260 (2017) (order).

Kortright's Estate

237 Pa. 143 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1912

Justice Brown, The testatrix gave the residue of her estate, amounting to $1,236,989.25, equally to the Presbyterian Hospital in Philadelphia, the Board of Home Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of … In Frazier v. St. Luke’s Church, 147 Pa. 256 ,-it was said by Mr.

Pinnacle Health Hospitals v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment Appeals

713 A.2d 1142 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 1998

August, 1998, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are granted, limited to the following issue: Does Polyclinic Medical Center operate entirely free from private profit motive as required by Hospital Utilization Project v. … This case is consolidated with Wilson Area School Distr., et al. v. Easton Hospital, — Pa.-, 713 A.2d 1143 , for purposes of oral argument. The Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

Mercantile Library Hall Co. v. Pittsburg Library Ass'n

173 Pa. 30 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1896

By reason of two vacancies at that time there were only seven managers, one of whom, Whitney, did not get the notice in time, and another of whom, Brown, did not attend, for reasons not explained. … Before leaving this branch of the case however we may call attention to the difference in Gloninger v. R. R.