Case law

Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

602 Pa. 195 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2009

Lincoln Philadelphia Realty Associates II v. Board of Revision of Taxes

556 Pa. 583 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1999

Rest Haven, Chestnut Hill, Inc. v. Commonwealth Board of Finance & Revenue

489 Pa. 220 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 16, 1980

South of South Street Neighborhood Ass'n v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

73 A.3d 525 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2013

Devereaux v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

511 Pa. 147 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1986

The order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole for reconsideration in light of Rivenbark v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 509 Pa. 248 , 501 A.2d 1110 (1985).

Hartenstine v. United Telephone & Telegraph Co.

219 Pa. 95 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1907

Justice Brown, At the time the husband of appellant was killed by an electric shock he was helping to string wires for the appellee. He was employed as a reelman. … In Prescott v.

Losito v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

499 Pa. 449 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1982

South of South Street Neighborhood Ass'n v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

621 Pa. 20 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2013

Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

611 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 2011

Borough of Heidelberg v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Selva), 593 Pa. 174 , 928 A.2d 1006, 1009 (2007). … While there are various distinctions between the two provisions, see, e.g., Mark v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Pittman, K., Aplt. v. PA Board of Prob & Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2017

Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated January 8, : 2016 at No. 978 CD 2014 Affirming the v … Herein, the Commonwealth Court, in an en banc opinion, affirmed the Board’s decision, determining that the Board had exercised its discretion by checking “No” on Appellant’s parole hearing review form. Pittman v.

Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Judges Professional Ass'n v. Executive Board of the Commonwealth

620 Pa. 217 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 21, 2013

Hatch v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

212 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1905

Justice Brown, It is the duty of the crew of a passenger train, the conductor and brakemen having it in charge, to see that all passengers boarding it, or manifestly intending to board it, are safely on it before the signal

Horton v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

509 Pa. 550 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1986

The Order of the Commonwealth Court entered on January 25, 1984, at No. 763 C.D.1984 is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Board of Probation and Parole for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Rivenbark v.

Hall v. POWER

455 Pa. 645 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1973

Justice Manderino dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Sweigard v. Department of Transportation, 454 Pa. 32, 35, 38 , 309 A. 2d 374, 376, 377 (1973); Brown v. … Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 577, 579, 580 , 305 A. 2d 868, 871, 874, 875 (1973); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187 , 301 A. 2d 849, 853 (1973); and Thomas v.

Hogan v. United Fruit Co.

266 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1920

Chief Justice Brown, On May 28, 1917, Michael Hogan, the husband of the appellant, while working as a stevedore in the employ of the United Fruit Company at a pier on the Delaware river, sustained injuries which resulted … His occupation as a stevedore was maritime in its nature : Southern Pacific Company v. Jenson, 244 U.

Commonwealth ex rel. v. Warren

217 Pa. 163 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1907

Justice Brown, This is an original proceeding before us to test the constitu *171 tionality of tlie office of respondent as dairy and food commissioner of the state. … The act of 1885, which was the act intended to be enforced, is a constitutional piece of legislation: Powell v. Commonwealth, 114 Pa. 265 ; 127 U. S. 6 78.

Miller & Son Paving, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Plumstead Township

690 A.2d 711 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1997

King of Prussia Associates v. Upper Merion Township Board of Adjustment

437 Pa. 576 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970

Sperling v. Euclid B. & L. Ass'n

308 Pa. 143 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1932

Sperring, 106 Pa. 334 ; Strohen v. Franklin Saving Fund & Loan Assn., 115 Pa. 273 ; Brown v. Victor Building Assn., 302 Pa. 254 ; Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Assn., 302 Pa. 544 . … We have considered this appeal at so great length because we recognize as still existing the difficult position of building associations, so graphically described in Brown v.

Baker v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

509 Pa. 552 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1986

consistent with this Court’s opinion in Rivenbark v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 509 Pa. 248 , 501 A.2d 1110 (1985).