Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • Fell v. McHenry

    42 Pa. 41 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1862

    The real merits of this case have been settled by this court in Craig v. McHenry, 11 Casey 120, but exceptions were taken to the admission of two witnesses, Messrs. … Goddard and Browne, and also to portions of the testimony, and to the charge of the court. Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth, Higher Education Assistance Agency v. State Employees' Retirement Board

    636 A.2d 629 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    607 Pa. 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2010

    Faculties v. Pa. … v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Packrall v. Quail

    411 Pa. 555 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1963

    See generally Brown v. Finnegan, 8 Pa. D. & C. 2d 780, 783-84 , aff’d per curiam, 389 Pa. 609 , 133 A. 2d 809 (1957). 3 Act of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, §976, as amended by the Act of July 5, 1947, P. … Brown v. Finnegan, 8 Pa. D. & C. 2d 780, 786 , aff’d per curiam, 389 Pa. 609 , 133 A. 2d 809 (1957).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Maloney v. U. Mine Workers of A.

    308 Pa. 251 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1932

    v. … Superior Ct. 512 ; Lytle v. New Castle Agricultural Assn., 91 Pa. Superior Ct. 152 ; Com. v. Union League, 135 Pa. 301 ; Beeman v. Supreme Lodge, 215 Pa. 627 .

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Krosby

    78 Pa. D. & C.4th 409 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 2005

    Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 509 Pa. 573 , 506 A.2d 872 (1986). … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommends that the respondent, Erling Rolf *437 Krosby, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crivelli Bros. Coal & Builders Supplies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    385 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1956

    P.L.R.B. v. Sansom House Enterprises, 378 Pa. 385 ; Del Buono et al. v. P.L.R.B., 370 Pa. 645 ; P.L.R.B. v. Daum, 365 Pa. 285 ; Lester v. P.L.R.B., 364 Pa. 541 . … This Court said in P.L.R.B. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth Ex Rel. Elliott v. Baldi

    373 Pa. 489 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1953

    See particularly Townsend v. Burke, Warden, 334 U. S. 736 and the recent United States Supreme Court cases of U. S. ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, 344 U. S. 561 ; Brown v. Allen, Warden, 344 U. S. 443 ; Speller v. … Justice Jackson in Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443; U. S. ex rel. Innes v. Hiatt 141 F. 2d. 664, 665-6; Com. v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Board of Property Assessment

    417 Pa. 454 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1965

    Opinion Per Curiam, The Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review introduced in evidence in the lower Court its record of assessment of appellant’s property, with a breakdown thereof into a valuation of land, and of … That Court ruled that the records of the Board made out a prima facie case, and this had not been overcome by the taxpayer’s evidence of the value of the building.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opening of Parkway

    267 Pa. 219 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1920

    Keller, 100 Pa. 105, 109 ; King v. Brown, 31 Pa. Superior Ct. 50, 51 . … If defendant was denied such right at that time, it should have appealed, within the statutory period, from the judgment of confirmation; not having done this, it is now too late: Brown v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis

    77 Pa. D. & C.4th 563 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2005

    Raquet v. … In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 64 D.B. 2003, 954 Disciplinary Docket no. 3 (Pa. Oct. 15, 2004), Mr. Brown was employed as a part-time public defender in Erie County.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    597 Pa. 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 2008

    amending the notice of Compensation payable to include a herniated lumbar disc in a proceeding on a termination petition where no Review petition had been filed, contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in Jeanes Hospital v. … WCAB (Hass), 582 Pa. 405 , 872 A.2d 159 (2005) and Commercial Credit Claims v. WCAB (Lancaster), 556 Pa. 325 , 728 A.2d 902 (1999)?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West Homestead Borough School District v. Allegheny County Board of School Directors

    440 Pa. 113 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1970

    Captan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, Inc., 431 Pa. 407 , 246 A. 2d 384 (1968); Reynolds Metal *117 Co. v. Berger, 423 Pa. 360 , 223 A. 2d 855 (1966); Nachod v. Nachod, 402 Pa. 60 , 166 A. 2d 18 (1960). … Our Court has discussed the powers of the State and County Boards in Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Richard E. Craft American Legion Home Corp.

    553 Pa. 99 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1998

    In Pennsylvania State Police v. … Adair v. Liquor Control Board, 519 Pa. 103 , 546 A.2d 19 (1988).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Bolden v. Greer

    257 Pa. 513 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1917

    Chief Justice Brown, This appeal is by The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York from the action of the court below affirming an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board to an injured employee. … True, it filed an answer for the employer, to the petition of employee for an award of compensation, and appealed for the employer from the award; but nowhere in the proceeding, either before the referee, the compensation board

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Newtown Square East, L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newtown Township

    64 A.3d 624 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2013

    err in adopting a novel interpretation of MPC Section 707(4)(iv) that has no basis in the law, that conflicts with the meaning of the term “use” throughout the MPC, and that conflicts with this Court’s decision in Eves v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 401 Pa. 211 , 164 A.2d 7 (1960)?

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Phi Lambda Theta Zoning Case

    400 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1960

    Neither need we consider it as equating an application for a variance, under the rule of Root v. Erie Zoning Board, 180 Pa. … An applicant must carry this burden: Fagan v. Zoning Board, 389 Pa. 99 (1957), 132 A. 2d 279 . In the instant case there is no such evidence introduced by anyone.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Mayers v. Atlantic Refining Co.

    254 Pa. 544 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1916

    Chief Justice Brown, James Mayers was an unskilled laborer employed by the Atlantic Refining Company. … He thereupon directed the entry of the nonsuit under what was decided by this court in Ross v. Walker, 139 Pa. 42 ; Finan v. Sutch, 220 Pa. 379 , and McGrath v. Thompson, 231 Pa. 631 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Motor Coils Mfg/WABTEC v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BISH)

    912 A.2d 212 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2006

    912 A.2d 212 (2006) MOTOR COILS MFG/WABTEC, Appellant, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BISH), Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 28, 2006. Decided December 27, 2006. Gregory J. … Lengler, Esq., Workers Compensation Appeal Board, Harrisburg for Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Thomas G. Wagner, Esq., St. Marys, for Amy Bish. David C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    595 Pa. 402 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2007

    Does a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement serve as a limitation on the authority of the County’s Salary Board, such that it is an unfair labor practice for the County to refuse to implement final grievance settlements … directing the reinstatement of five necessary court appointed employees who were terminated as the result of action taken by the Commissioners, sitting as the Salary Board?

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.