Case law

Mercer School District v. Cummins

1 Monag. 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1888

Morris v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

550 Pa. 572 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1998

The matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for a determination of this issue pursuant to this Court’s decision in Smith v. Board of Probation and Parole, 546 Pa. 115 , 683 A.2d 278 (1996).

Knox v. Board of School Directors of Susquenita School District

850 A.2d 611 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2004

Young, O. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2020

See, e.g., Board’s Brief at 12-15 (citing, inter alia, Richards v. PBPP, 20 A.3d 596, 599 (Pa. … Co. v. Ins. Dep't, 638 A.2d 194, 200 (Pa. 1994)).

Ballard v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Valley Forge Colonial Ltd. Partnership)

169 A.3d 32 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2017

Mir v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs, State Board of Medicine

169 A.3d 543 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 2017

Wurtenberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Tenet Health System Hahnemann, LLC)

166 A.3d 1210 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2017

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware)

165 A.3d 887 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2017

Millcreek Township School District v. Erie County Board of Assessment Appeals

164 A.3d 484 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2016

Board of Revision of Taxes, City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia

607 Pa. 104 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2010

Board of Revision of Taxes v. City of Philadelphia, 993 A.2d 873 (Pa.2010). … See Vaccone v.

Ballard v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Valley Forge Colonial Ltd. Partnership)

169 A.3d 32 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2017

Novitski v. Commonwealth, Board of Probation & Parole

511 Pa. 230 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1986

consistent with this Court’s opinion in Rivenbark v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 509 Pa. 248 , 501 A.2d 1110 (1985).

Young, O. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2020

See generally Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh, 608 Pa. 386, 395, 11 A.3d 960, 966 (2011) (restating the axiom that the holding of a judicial decision is read against its facts). … In this regard, to the extent that the Board might attempt to incorporate any conditions into its future credit awards, the routinizing of such conditions -- absent 1In Pittman v.

Wurtenberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Tenet Health System Hahnemann, LLC)

166 A.3d 1210 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2017

Steward v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

547 Pa. 4 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1997

we GRANT Petitioner’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal and REMAND this matter to the Commonwealth Court for a determination of the timeliness of Petitioner’s notice of appeal to the Commonwealth Court pursuant to Smith v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 546 Pa. 115 , 683 A.2d 278 (1996). Petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis before this court is also GRANTED.

Alliance Home of Carlisle, PA v. Board of Assessment Appeals

580 Pa. 562 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2004

Whether, as a preliminary matter, petitioner was required, under Article VIII, Section 2(a)(v) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, to demonstrate that the parcel in question independently served, in and of itself, a charitable

Smith v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Department of Corrections

861 A.2d 262 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2004

Stajkowski v. Carbon County Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes

518 Pa. 150 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 20, 1988

Crosson v. Downington Area School District, 440 Pa. 468 , 270 A.2d 377 (1970); Saulsbury v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 413 Pa. 316 , 196 A.2d 664 (1964); Gaugler v. … City of Allentown, 410 Pa. 315 , 189 A.2d 264 (1963); Danyluk v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 406 Pa. 427 , 178 A.2d 609 (1962); Banger’s Appeal, 109 Pa. 79 (1885); Miller v. Kirkpatrick, 29 Pa. 226 (1857); Reizes v.

Tax Review Board v. Hydrocarbon Research, Inc.

406 Pa. 396 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1962

, sustained the board. … “It was for the foregoing reasons that we found that the instant case is ruled by Goldstein v.

Crossgates, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Public Grounds & Buildings

535 Pa. 420 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1994