Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.76s
Sweigard v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
454 Pa. 32 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1973
See Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179 , 301 A. 2d 849 (1973). We have just recently spoken directly to appellants’ first and third contentions. In Brown v. … We also rejected in Brown the notion *35 that the existence of statutorily mandated public liability insurance evidences a legislative intent to reject sovereign immunity in this context. Id. at 570 , 305 A. 2d at 869 .
Overruled by Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384 (1978)Cited 22 timesPublishedPennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue
553 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1998
It relies on Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. … Commonwealth v. Rieck Inv. Corp., 419 Pa. 52 , 213 A.2d 277 (1965).
Cited 6 timesPublishedCornerstone Development Group v. Board of Sup'rs of Butler Tp.
964 A.2d 896 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2009
964 A.2d 896 (2009) CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT GROUP v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF BUTLER TP. No. 460 & 461 MAL (2008). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. January 21, 2009. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedConde v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
573 Pa. 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 2003
Coady v. Vaughn, 564 Pa. 604 , 770 A.2d 287 (2001) (mandamus will not lie where substance of Board’s discretionary action is subject of challenge); Rogers v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 555 Pa. 285 , 724 A.2d 319 (1999) (denial of parole is generally discretionary matter not subject to review). Justice NIGRO dissents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGrath v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs, State Board of Nursing
173 A.3d 656 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017
State Real Estate Comm’n v. … See generally Brown v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
358 Pa. 224 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1947
The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and the Superior Court of Pennsylvania answered this question affirmatively. … The appellant thereupon filed an appeal with the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and on August 5, 1946, the Board of Review issued an order upholding the referee’s Findings, of Facts and Conclusion of Law awarding
Cited 71 timesPublishedChartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board of School Directors
418 Pa. 520 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965
Milk Control Board, 322 Pa. 257, 277-79, 186 Atl. 336, 345 (1336); Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. … In Bargain City U.S.A., Inc. v.
Cited 114 timesPublished500 James Hance Court v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board
606 Pa. 502 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 2010
Cited 1 timesPublishedBorough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & Review
459 Pa. 268 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1974
We transferred the appeal to the Commonwealth Court, Borough of Greentree v. Board of Property Assessment, 446 Pa. 309 , 285 A.2d 165 (1971). … May Department Stores Co. v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, 441 Pa. 556, 564 , 272 A.2d 862 (1971) (emphasis supplied). . Cf.
Cited 147 timesPublishedWilmerding Borough School District Board of School Directors v. Gillies
343 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1941
The secretary of the school board testified that the board received a protest from the American Legion after the newspaper publication. This Avas the whole case against appellant. … There is not sufficient in the testimony to warrant dismissal of respondent on the grounds of “immorality” or “incompetency” as Ave have construed those terms in Horosko v. Mt.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
845 A.2d 758 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2004
CURIAM: AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, and the case is remanded to the Commonwealth Court for consideration of this Court’s decision in City of Philadelphia v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCox v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
578 Pa. 437 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2004
See Finnegan v. PBPP, 576 Pa. 59 , 838 A.2d 684 (2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSaunders v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
578 Pa. 436 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2004
See Finnegan v. PBPP, 576 Pa. 59 , 838 A.2d 684 (2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
842 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2003
See City of Philadelphia v. WCAB (Szpar-agowski), 831 A.2d 577 , 2003 WL 21959994 (Pa. Aug. 18, 2003). Justice THOMAS G. SAYLOR dissents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMistich v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
577 Pa. 418 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2004
ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2004, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is re *419 manded for reconsideration in light of Martin v. PBPP, 840 A.2d 299 (Pa.2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWTISD v. PA State Board of Educ Pet of: PSEA/NEA
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 2021
: No. 365 MAL 2020 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal v … : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF : EDUCATION
Cited 0 timesPublishedParkesburg Borough v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
816 A.2d 1096 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2003
The order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of Burger v. UCBR, 569 Pa. 139 , 801 A.2d 487 (2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDonton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
578 Pa. 435 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2004
See Finnegan v. PBPP, 576 Pa. 59 , 838 A.2d 684 (2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedE.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
573 Pa. 411 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 2003
GRANTED, limited to the following issues: In a case of first impression, whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that Section 306(c)(8)(vi) is inapplicable to an insurer, thereby rendering a decision in conflict with Brown … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMunoz v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
578 Pa. 166 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2004
the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed, and the matter is remanded for recalculation of Petitioner’s maximum release date, with disposition consistent with Martin v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 576 Pa. 588 , 840 A.2d 299 (2003). The Application for Special Relief Under Pa.R.A.P. 123 is denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna