Case law

Tennon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

183 A.3d 346 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2018

Township of Exeter v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF EXETER TOWNSHIP

592 Pa. 607 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2007

Harris v. Board of Public Education of the School District

306 Pa. 546 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1932

School Dist. v. Pittsburgh School Dist., 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 75 , 79: “The purpose at the base of our common school laws is to provide all children residing within the Commonwealth with a good common school education. … In carrying out this purpose the various school districts are merely the agents of the Commonwealth: Ford v. School District, 121 Pa. 543 ; Gettysburg v. School District, 50 Pa. Superior Ct. 87 .

Board of Education of the School District v. Kushner

520 Pa. 91 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1989

Rodriguez v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

959 A.2d 906 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 2008

See Grieb v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 567 Pa. 298 , 787 A.2d 284 (2001) (same).

Rodriguez v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

598 Pa. 603 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 2008

See Grieb v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 567 Pa. 298 , 787 A.2d 284 (2001) (same).

Commonwealth ex rel. Diamond v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole

407 Pa. 648 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1962

Board of Wardens of Port v. City of Philadelphia

42 Pa. 209 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1862

Another and different revisory body was provided, to wit, the county board; and because the county board were to approve the site, plan, and specifications of the bridge, the port wardens were not. … The legislature did not mean to provide two supervisory powers, but they did mean to substitute the county board for the board of port wardens.

Citizens for Responsible Government v. County Board of Elections

472 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1977

A. Blumberg & Son, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

416 Pa. 557 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965

Opinion Per Curiam, Neighbors were aggrieved by an Order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment which was affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas. This Order granted a permit in 1958 for a junk yard.

Theresa Friedman & Sons, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

398 Pa. 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1960

Here, acting only on the record established by the zoning board, the court below has substituted its own views for those of the zoning board *496 which is entrusted with the responsibility to make findings of fact. … Drawing inferences of this nature is the function of the zoning board, committed thereto because of their peculiar expertise. I would affirm the decision of the board and reverse the court below.

Welliver McGuire, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

889 A.2d 43 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 2005

See Kramer v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Rite Aid Corp.) 883 A.2d 518 , 2005 WL 2386097 (Pa.2005).

Crystal Forest Associates, Lp v. Board of Sup'rs of Buckingham Tp.

895 A.2d 551 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2006

895 A.2d 551 (2006) CRYSTAL FOREST ASSOCIATES, LP v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF BUCKINGHAM TP. [45] . No. 503 MAL (2005) Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. March 6, 2006. Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal denied.

Stewart Honeybee Products, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue

525 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1990

of Finance and Revenue. *224 Our opinion in Ski Roundtop v. … Compare Commonwealth v.

City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board

50 A.3d 1253 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2012

City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board

616 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2012

Mattson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (ATACS Corp.)

721 A.2d 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1998

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the decision of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED pursuant to Lykins v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 552 Pa. 1 , 713 A.2d 77 (Pa.1998). The matter is REMANDED to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board for consider *56 ation of the merits of Petitioner’s penalty-petition.

George v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

603 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2009

. § 723(a); Werner v. Zazyczny, 545 Pa. 570 , 681 A.2d 1331 , 1335 n. 5 (1996).

Myers v. Esery

134 Pa. 177 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1890

v. … In Riddle v. Welden, 5 Wh. 9 , the goods of a boarder were held not to be liable for rent due by the keeper of the boarding house.

Commonwealth v. Hart

479 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1978

Peterman, 430 Pa. 627 , 244 A.2d 723 (1968) (reading of record to jury); Commonwealth v. Brown, 438 Pa. 52 , 265 A.2d 101 (1970) (court’s discretion to question witnesses); Commonwealth v. … Brown, 467 Pa. 512 , 359 A.2d 393 (1976) (prosecutorial comments); Rose v. Hoover, 231 Pa.Super. 251 , 331 A.2d 878 (1975) (scope of cross-examination).