Case law

Hines Nurseries, Inc. v. Plumstead Township Board of Supervisors

580 Pa. 357 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2004

As the Commonwealth Court dissent observed, however, the stipulation upon which the Plumstead Township Board of Supervisors relied in the present matter is not material to Petitioner’s application for a lot line change and

State Workers' Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

583 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2005

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

579 Pa. 535 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2004

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July 2004, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and CONSOLIDATE it with Gardner v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures), 14 EAP 2004.

Moumen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Supreme Mid Atlantic Trucking)

169 A.3d 529 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2017

Thall Appeal

410 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1963

Streibert v. York School District Directors, 339 Pa. 119 , 14 A. 2d 303 (1940). In fact, the difficult situation before us might well have been avoided had the Board complied with section 1123. … Superior Ct. 587 , 26 A. 2d 121 (1942); Spruce Hill Township School District Board of Directors v. Bryner, 148 Pa.

Whalen, R. v. Public School Empl Ret Board, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021

On appeal, the Commonwealth Court agreed with the Board, reasoning it was simply interpreting a contract, and contractual interpretation is a purely legal inquiry. See Whalen v. Pub. Sch. Emps.’ Ret. … See, e.g., Roberts v.

Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Franklin & Lindsey, Inc.

497 Pa. 2 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1981

On appeal, the Commonwealth Court reversed the order of the Board and denied claimant benefits. Franklin & Lindsey, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 40 Pa.Commw.Ct. 59 , 396 A.2d 497 (1979). … Statutory Construction Act of 1970, 1 Pa.C.S.A. § 1928(c) .... ” Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 479 Pa. 324, 330 , 388 A.2d 678, 681 (1978).

Allegheny Valley School v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

548 Pa. 355 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1997

Zerbe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 545 Pa. 406, 411 , 681 A.2d 740, 742 (1996). … In Taylor v.

Judicial Inquiry & Review Board of the Supreme Court v. Fink

516 Pa. 208 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1987

Board Ex. 27, Opinion in Commonwealth v. McCaslin, No 21 of 1984 (C.P. Potter Co.). … Board’s Ex. 20, Commonwealth v. Cornish, Entry of Plea Hearing, 18-20 (July 27, 1984).

Fifty-Fourth Street Center, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

395 Pa. 338 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1959

In Novello v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 384 Pa. 294 , 121 A. 2d 91 (1956), we approved a certificate for a car wash issued by the zoning board with conditions imposed similar to those in the instant case. … It is clear that health, safety, morals, and general welfare is a sufficient standard for the board. Archbishop O’Hara’s Appeal, 389 Pa. 35 , 131 A. 2d 587 (1957); Best v.

Latrobe Speedway, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Unity Township

553 Pa. 583 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1998

Latrobe Speedway v. Zoning Hearing Board of Unity Township, 686 A.2d 888, 890 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). … The common pleas court relied on the Commonwealth Court’s decisions in Ralph & Joanne’s, Inc. v. Neshannock Township Zoning Hearing Board, 121 Pa.Cmwlth. 83 , 550 A.2d 586 (Pa.Cmwlth.1988), and Heyman v.

Longvue Disposal Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review

375 Pa. 35 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1953

Northampton County, 8 W. & S. 334 , and Conoy Township v. … See also Pittsburgh Joint Stock Yards Company v. Board of Property Assessment, 353 Pa. 135, 137 , 44 A. 2d 564 ; and Atlantic Freight Lines, Inc. v. Rankin, 373 Pa. 517 , 96 A. 2d 870 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Gallas v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

542 Pa. 159 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1995

Deer Creek Drainage Basin Authority v. County Board of Elections

475 Pa. 491 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1977

See Committee for New Cobb County Revenue v. Brown, 228 Ga. 364 , 185 S.E.2d 534 (1971); Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Minneapolis v. … Upper Dublin Twp. v. Piszek, 420 Pa. 536 , 218 A.2d 328 (1966). See also Jonnet v. Municipality of Monroeville, 31 Cmwlth. 437, 376 A.2d 1015 (1977). .

Bainbridge v. Union Traction Co.

206 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1903

Justice Brown, The plaintiff below got on a car of the defendant company *72 at Twelfth and Walnut streets, in the city of Philadelphia, and took a seat about the middle of it. … of his position from any cause: Thane v.

Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

586 Pa. 85 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2005

Exel Logistics appeals from the order of the Commonwealth Court reversing the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which granted Super-sedeas Fund reimbursement. We affirm. … See Pieper v.

Adams v. Pa. Parole Bd.

196 A.3d 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2018

Spuck v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

605 Pa. 409 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2010

See Commonwealth v. Bracalielly, 540 Pa. 460 , 658 A.2d 755, 763 (1995) (law of Pennsylvania is well settled that matters which are not of record cannot be considered on appeal).

Triangle Building Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Linch)

721 A.2d 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1998

Bartle v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

391 Pa. 207 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1958

391 Pa. 207 (1958) Bartle, Appellant, v. Zoning Board of Adjustment. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 19, 1957. … . *209 OPINION PER CURIAM, January 8, 1958: The order of the court below dismissing the appeal from the decision of the zoning board of adjustment is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge BROWN, 10 Pa.