Case law

Motor Coils MFG/WABTEC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

912 A.2d 212 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2006

Society Hill Civic Association v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

593 Pa. 323 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2007

Alpha Club of West Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

363 Pa. 53 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1949

This affords plaintiff a full, complete and adequate remedy at lav/: O’Donnell v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 351 Pa. 129 .” … Chidsey v.

United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

579 Pa. 618 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 2004

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (the “Board”) summarily affirmed. 5 The Commonwealth Court reversed the Board, overruling Ehman in the process. See United States Steel Corp. (USX Clairton Works) v. … See Watkins, 736 F.2d at 937 (citing, inter alia, Brown v. Poreher, 660 F.2d 1001 , 1004 (4th Cir.1981); McKay v. Horn, 529 F.Supp. 847 , 850 n. 4 (D.N.J.1981); H.R.Rep. No. 1343, Conf.

Pennsylvania Social Services Union v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

474 Pa. 168 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1977

OPINION PER CURIAM: The orders of the Commonwealth Court and the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board are hereby vacated. … This case is remanded to the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board for further proceedings in light of Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Friendship Preservation Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

588 Pa. 740 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2006

Ferrero v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (CH & D Enterprises)

556 Pa. 97 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1999

Pennsylvania Social Services Local 668 v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

481 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978

On the merits, the lower court affirmed the Labor Board’s administrative dismissal of the charges and the Union now appeals from that decision. Pennsylvania Social Services Union, Local 668 v. … See Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co., 465 Pa. 225 , 348 A.2d 734, 735 (1975); Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd. v.

State Workers' Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

583 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2005

Collins v. Barclay

7 Pa. 67 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1847

It was in Lambourn v. Hartswick that Mr. … The very point came before the court in Nieman v.

Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

479 Pa. 324 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1978

This is an appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s reversal of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (Board) grant of unemployment compensation benefits to David A. … Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 160 Pa.Super. 379 , 51 A.2d 518 (1947); Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa.Super. 315 , 31 A.2d 740 (1943); Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review v.

Friendship Preservation Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

906 A.2d 1194 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2006

South Philadelphia Dressed Beef Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

391 Pa. 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1958

Dooling’s Windy Hill v. Springfield Township, 371 Pa. 290 (1952) ; Silverco, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, 379 Pa. 497, 503-504 (1954); . . . Fagan v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, [ 389 Pa. 99 ]..... … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 379 Pa. 497 , 109 A. 2d 147 ; Walker v. *117 Zoning Board of Adjustment, 380 Pa. 228 , 110 A. 2d 414 .”

Moumen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Supreme Mid Atlantic Trucking)

169 A.3d 529 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2017

Lawrence v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

619 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2013

AND NOW, this 19th day of April 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Commonwealth Court’s decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Diehl v.

Whalen, R. v. Public School Empl Ret Board, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021

On appeal, the Commonwealth Court agreed with the Board, reasoning it was simply interpreting a contract, and contractual interpretation is a purely legal inquiry. See Whalen v. Pub. Sch. Emps.’ Ret. … See, e.g., Roberts v.

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Boles)

552 Pa. 148 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1998

In the recent case of Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Baxter), 550 Pa. 658 , 708 A.2d 801 (1998), this Court held that a claimant is not entitled to receive workers’ compensation benefits for a pre-existing non-work related condition when

Dehoff v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

619 Pa. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2013

AND NOW, this 19th day of April 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Commonwealth Court’s decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Diehl v.

Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Allegheny County Board

356 Pa. 373 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1947

Pittston Township School District v. Dupont Borough School District

275 Pa. 183 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1922

This contention we cannot sustain: Williamsport v. Citizens Water & Gas Co., 232 Pa. 232 . … L. 1911, page 311. *191 The final suggestion made by appellants (which is not included in the statement of the questions involved and hence not entitled to consideration: Furman v. Broscious, 268 Pa. 119 ; Keck v.