Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.02s

  • Brass Rail Restaurant Co. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    375 Pa. 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1953

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Derry Area School District)

    635 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 2016

    Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (DERRY AREA SCHOOL : DISTRICT),

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    570 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2002

    Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues: 1) Whether a Workers’ Compensation Judge has authority to determine paternity. 2) If such authority exists, and in consideration of the factors set forth in Minnich v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Citizens Against Gambling Subsidies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board

    591 Pa. 312 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2007

    Brown, Pennsylvania Appellate Practice 2D § 501:14 (2d ed. 1998 & Supp. … See, e.g., Stilp v. Commonwealth, 588 Pa. 539 , 905 A.2d 918, 950-51 (2006); Sprague v. Casey, 520 Pa. 38, 550 A.2d 184, 187 (1988); Ezy Parks v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Riley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

    791 A.2d 1152 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 2002

    Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Ins. Co., 521 Pa. 462 , 555 A.2d 1284 (1989).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Street Road Bar & Grille, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    583 Pa. 72 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2005

    See generally Commonwealth v. … Thus, in Atiyeh v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Koonce v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    727 A.2d 1108 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1999

    Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED, the Petition for Allowance to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED and the Motion For Appointment Of Counsel is DISMISSED AS MOOT pursuant to this Court’s decision in Rogers et al v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, — Pa. -, 724 A.2d 319 (1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    568 Pa. 594 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2002

    2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to consider whether Claimant’s claim petition was timely filed based on this Court’s decision in Schreffler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Union Electric Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review

    560 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2000

    Pennsylvania Water Co. v. … Commw. 133 , 555 A.2d 1357 (1989) (appeal nunc pro tunc granted where Board improperly failed to strike tax liens which were ruled null and void by the court); Moore v.

    Cited 133 timesPublished
  • Home Life Insurance Co. of America v. Board of Adjustment

    393 Pa. 447 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1958

    In Knup v. … Chief Justice Steen said for this court in Knup v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School District

    461 Pa. 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

    B. v. … Board of Education, City of Englewood v. Englewood Teachers Ass’n., 64 N.J. 1 , 311 A.2d 729 (1973); Board of Education of Union Free School District # 3 v.

    Cited 167 timesPublished
  • W & L Sales Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    524 Pa. 591 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1990

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • William H. Beard, Inc. v. State Board of Undertakers

    387 Pa. 261 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1956

    So long as there is no omission of a remedy for the enforcement of a right for which a remedy existed when the right accrued, a want of due process is in no way involved”: Agostin v. … In Merner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    402 Pa. 202 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1961

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Union Canal Co. v. Woodside

    11 Pa. 176 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1849

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paolucci v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    633 Pa. 697 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2015

    The issues are: (1) Does the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflict with this Court’s precedent in Bortz v. … (2) Does the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflict with this Court’s precedent in Harkness v. U[nemployment Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    539 Pa. 322 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1995

    Joe Container Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Staroschuck), 534 Pa. 347 , 633 A.2d 128 (1993); Gumro v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 533 Pa. 461 , 626 A.2d 94 (1993). … City of Harrisburg v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Gebhart), 532 Pa. 592 , 616 A.2d 1369 (1992); Hohman v. George H.

    Cited 179 timesPublished
  • Mattson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    554 Pa. 274 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1998

    ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the decision of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED pursuant to Lykins v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 552 Pa. 1, 713 A.2d 77 (Pa.1998). The matter is REMANDED to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board for consideration of the merits of Petitioner’s penalty petition.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Canonsburg General Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    540 Pa. 531 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1995

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Steward v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    688 A.2d 166 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1997

    we GRANT Petitioner’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal and REMAND this matter to the Commonwealth Court for a determination of the timeliness of Petitioner’s notice of appeal to the Commonwealth Court pursuant to Smith v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, — Pa. -, 683 A.2d 278 (1996). Petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis before this court is also GRANTED.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.