Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,219 results
0.71s
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anonymous Attorney A
528 Pa. 83 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1991
“When the Constitution clearly sets forth the manner in which something shall be done, that procedure must be followed to the exclusion of all others ....” Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. … It specifically covers all conduct of a judge, and unlike the provisions of Article 5, section 18(d), it is written without any qualifying or restrictive language. Id., 483 Pa. at 458, 459 , 397 A.2d at 756, 757 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedCommonwealth Trust Co. General Mortgage Investment Fund Case
357 Pa. 349 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1947
This is a sound principle of justice, and should be applied without any further question as to whether the mistake is intrinsic or extrinsic, or whether it affects identify or qualify.” … Jur., section 138 e and f, said, “the rule that an admitted or clearly established misapprehension of the law does create a basis for the interference of courts of equity, resting on discretion, and to be exercised only in
Cited 38 timesPublishedCom. v. Chesapeake Energy (Anadarko, Aplt.)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2021
The OAG reads Danganan as instructing that “the second part of this definition does not modify or qualify the first part.” Id. … ANALYSIS The UTPCPL clearly regulates the conduct of sellers, and it does not provide a remedy for sellers to exercise against buyers.
Cited 0 timesPublished607 Pa. 629 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2010
Clearly, Magliocco has limited relevance to the present matter. … Terroristic threats, a chapter 27 offense, was a qualifying Article B offense. Magliocco II, supra at 489 n. 8. .
Cited 44 timesPublished385 Pa. Super. 587 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1989
Our standard of review is well established. … Clearly, the possibility of a hole-in-one is sufficiently remote to qualify as the necessary gambling requirement of an element of chance.
Cited 25 timesPublishedJ.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District
569 Pa. 638 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2002
— materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others is, of course, not immunized by the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech.” … While there is no dispute that the web site was *668 created off-campus, the record clearly reflects that the off-campus web site was accessed by J.S. at school and was shown to a fellow student.
Abrogated by Commonwealth v. Knox, J., Aplt., 190 A.3d 1146 (2018)Cited 34 timesPublished382 Pa. Super. 487 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1989
The Court in Mazzagatti determined that the critical element for establishing such liability was the contemporaneous observance of the injury to the close relative. … The trial court reasoned that: Clearly our Supreme Court focused upon the first-hand observation by plaintiff of her son’s fatal accident in Sinn v. Burd.
Cited 33 timesPublished591 Pa. 196 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2007
The answer to this question hinges on our interpretation of the Act’s “non-duplication of recovery” provision. 3 For the reasons that follow, we find that the answer to this question is a qualified “No.” … Contrarily, the legislature, both in the former PIGA Act and in the current PPCIGA Act, clearly has attempted to establish the Association as an entity subject to the same “rights, duties and obligations of the insolvent
Cited 42 timesPublishedDooner v. President of Delaware
171 Pa. 581 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1895
He therefore had all the experience necessary to qualify him for the performance of his duties, and to apprise him of its risks and hazards. … But, very clearly, he should have looked for that additional handhold, before he put himself in such an extremely hazardous position.
Cited 10 timesPublished436 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1970
The judge noted "The impact rule will, no doubt, eventually be rejected as was the formerly well-entrenched rule of charitable immunities. … Moreover, I may add that which is often forgotten by the Majority it is one of the most important duties of an appellate Court to erect legal signposts with language inscribed thereon so clearly, definitely, wisely and
Modified on other grounds by Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 (1979)Cited 209 timesPublishedCommonwealth v. Shifflett, G., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 2025
My reasoning follows. 1 Together, Apprendi and Alleyne establish a general rule that facts which increase the range of sentences to which a defendant is exposed must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt (hereinafter … Thus, the majority errs by declaring Section 3806(a) unconstitutional to the extent it defines a “prior offense” to include a prior ARD acceptance for purposes of sentencing under Section 3804. 2 To qualify as a prior
Cited 0 timesPublished404 Pa. 100 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1961
JUSTICE BELL, May 22, 1961: Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit which was entered in her suit against defendant, a physician who was certified as specially qualified by the Board of Gastroenterology. … The law in Pennsylvania on this point is clearly annunciated in the Robinson and Wirts case, which was decided in 387 Pennsylvania 291."
Cited 15 timesPublishedVolunteer Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. Minehart
425 Pa. 82 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1967
Of the approximately 8,000 members of the Relief Association, approximately 4,700 qualify for the Special Death Benefit Fund. *87 The gist of appellees' objection to the use of state money and the interest earned thereon … This does not involve interference with the internal affairs of appellant for, as the Auditor General has stated, nothing prevents the association from establishing a special death benefit *92 limited in its coverage as long
Cited 26 timesPublishedEQT Production v. Boro of Jefferson Hills, Aplt.
208 A.3d 1010 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 2019
EQT proffers that, by contrast, none of the witnesses who testified to their experiences with the Trax Farm site were qualified to render an expert opinion regarding potential community impacts from the Bickerton site, … The Commonwealth Court reversed on the basis that the evidence constituted only “unsupported anxieties” and established only “the mere possibility of an adverse impact,” which was insufficient to establish detriment.
Cited 19 timesPublished532 Pa. 326 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1992
Even so, risks remain in reviewing their qualified testimony. … DiPlacido’s testimony as clearly contradicted by evidence of two credible witnesses.
Abrogated on other grounds by In Re Angeles Roca First Judicial District Philadelphia County, 173 A.3d 1176 (2017)Cited 68 timesPublished452 Pa. 233 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1973
Clearly, however, these detriments are not of the same order, and while it is doubtless wise to have a prohibition against the former written into the Constitution as a principle of fundamental fairness shared by all civilized … Is such a prisoner to be regarded as having been afforded “a relatively painless form of immunity” by the circumstance that the slate happened to prosecute the less serious offense first?
Vacated by Pennsylvania v. Campana, 414 U.S. 808 (1973)Cited 256 timesPublished604 Pa. 61 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2009
The ex post facto clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides: "No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, or making irrevocable any grant of special privileges or immunities, shall be passed … Regardless of the precise articulation, some statements qualify under any definition-for example, ex parte testimony at a preliminary hearing. Id. at 51-52 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 (citations omitted).
Reversed on other grounds by Allshouse v. Pennsylvania, 179 L. Ed. 2d 495 (2011)Cited 28 timesPublishedIn Re: Appeal for Formation of Independent SD
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 2021
For educational policy reasons, the General Assembly “clearly intended to foster the creation of financially stable school districts[.]” Id. The Secretary therefore stated that he could not approve the petition. … In regulating how school districts utilize funding, the Public School Code establishes minimum requirements for employing and paying qualified professional employees. Id. §§ 11-1106.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re: Appeal for Formation of Independent SD
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 2021
For educational policy reasons, the General Assembly “clearly intended to foster the creation of financially stable school districts[.]” Id. The Secretary therefore stated that he could not approve the petition. … In regulating how school districts utilize funding, the Public School Code establishes minimum requirements for employing and paying qualified professional employees. Id. §§ 11-1106.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRich Hill Coal Company v. Bashore
334 Pa. 449 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1939
The presumptions legislatively created by the challenged acts clearly fall within the category just described. … Suppose the "proposition" to be established by legal evidence was that B committed a certain crime?
Cited 82 timesPublished
Ask Donna