Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.58s

  • Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board

    512 Pa. 377 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1986

    Brayo v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 62 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 234, 435 A.2d 1346 (1981). … Kline v. Morrison, 353 Pa. 79 , 44 A.2d 267 (1945). When a member retires and elects a retirement option, he enters into a contract with the Board. Bowers v. State Employe’s Retirement System, 29 Pa.

    Overruled in part by Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 571 Pa. 189 (2002)Cited 393 timesPublished
  • Schneller v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF RADNOR TP.

    606 Pa. 518 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2010

    The requests for attorney’s fees by Respondent Board of Commissioners of Radnor Township and Intervenor Louella Holding Company are denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schneller v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF RADNOR TOWNSHIP

    606 Pa. 518 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2010

    The requests for attorney’s fees by Respondent Zoning Hearing Board of Radnor Township and Intervenor Norcini Builders, Inc., are denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Awacs, Inc. v. Londonderry Township Zoning Hearing Board

    559 Pa. 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1999

    See Crown Communications v. Zoning Hearing Board of Borough of Glenfield, 550 Pa. 266 , 705 A.2d 427 (1997)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    501 Pa. 550 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1983

    Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of Adjustment, supra; Filanowski v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra; O’Neill v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 434 Pa. 331 , 254 A.2d 12 (1969); Jasy Corp. v. … Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of Adjustment, supra; O’Neill v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra; Hasage v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra; Dishler v.

    Cited 531 timesPublished
  • Commercial Credit Claims v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Lancaster)

    556 Pa. 325 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1999

    On appeal, the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the WCJ. The Commonwealth Court affirmed the Board in an unpublished *329 opinion. Subsequently, this Court granted allocatur. Commercial Credit Claims v. … See Ryan v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    606 Pa. 225 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2010

    AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2010, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s Motion to Dismiss as Moot is GRANTED,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Independent Oil and Gas Association v. Board of Assessment

    572 Pa. 240 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2002

    Unionville-Chadds Ford School District v. Chester County Board of Assessment Appeals, 692 A.2d 1136, 1143 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997), aff'd, 552 Pa. 212 , 714 A.2d 397 (1998). … See Funk v. Haldeman, 53 Pa. 229 (1867); Gill v. Weston, 110 Pa. 305 , 1 A. 917 (1885); Westmoreland & Cambria Natural Gas Co. v. DeWitt, 130 Pa. 235 , 18 A. 724 (1889); Blakley v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    644 A.2d 729 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1994

    The petition for allowance of appeal is granted and the matter is remanded to the referee with instructions that it be decided in accordance with this Court’s recent holding in Dillon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Kaufmann Department Stores, Inc.

    345 Pa. 398 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1942

    facts and circumstances: National Labor Relations Board v. … S. 1, 45, 46 ; Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U. S. 103, 132 ; Phelps-Dodge Corporation v. Na *402 tional Labor Relations Board, 313 U. S. 177, 186, 187; Jefferson Electric Co. v.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Montgomery County v. Lukens

    494 Pa. 64 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1981

    See Hartshorn v. County of Allegheny, 460 Pa. 560 , 333 A.2d 914 (1975). O’BRIEN, C. J., and WILKINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Philadelphia v. WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

    607 Pa. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2010

    NOW, this 9th day of September, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue: Whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision to reverse the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    605 Pa. 659 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wellsville Terminals Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    534 Pa. 333 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1993

    The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the second referee’s decision. Employer appealed to the Commonwealth Court, which affirmed the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 148 Pa. … In Herb's Welding Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    539 Pa. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1994

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McGriff v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    574 Pa. 459 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 2003

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Royster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    606 Pa. 521 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mason v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    606 Pa. 288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    599 Pa. 158 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Disciplinary Board of Supreme Court

    468 Pa. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1976

    We hold that the Board’s action was not in contravention of our rules nor an abuse of the Board’s discretion. … Since no First Amendment violation is claimed in this case our recent decision in McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 465 Pa. 104 , 348 A.2d 376 (1975), is not apposite. .

    Cited 50 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.