Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.46s

  • Handy v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    619 Pa. 214 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gould v. Zoning Hearing Board of Bristol Borough

    616 Pa. 366 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    798 A.2d 1274 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2002

    2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to consider whether Claimant’s claim petition was timely filed based on this Court’s decision in Schreffler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    81 A.3d 882 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2013

    , the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc. v. … Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Robinson), — Pa. -, 67 A.3d 1194 (2013).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 593 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Pittman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Easley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2017

    this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation *589 and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed April 26,2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2017

    The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2017

    The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board

    592 Pa. 419 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2007

    In this regard, the common pleas court relied on Hogan, Lepore Hogan v. … for purposes of Section 908(9)); see also Gaster v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 593 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Pittman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Talkish v. Zoning Hearing Board

    562 Pa. 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2000

    ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue: Whether this Court’s holding in Hertzberg v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 554 Pa. 249 , 721 A.2d 43 (1998), which applied a relaxed evidentiary standard for dimensional variances, overrules the requirement that an applicant for a variance present

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sharpe v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2017

    this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed April 26, 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marshal v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 580 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Pittman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marshal v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 580 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2017

    ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Pittman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGriff v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    615 Pa. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • TECH ONE ASSOCIATES v. Board of Property Assessment

    607 Pa. 323 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 2010

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tyler v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    38 A.3d 820 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2012

    38 A.3d 820 (2012) Michael TYLER, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, and Department of Corrections Community Corrections Center, Appellees.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tilley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    601 Pa. 100 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 2009

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • LUSIK v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    615 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eidem v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    731 A.2d 128 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1999

    in finding that the referral letter did not provide sufficient notice of a job position, where employee had previously been employed in that position, in order to satisfy employer’s burden of proof pursuant to Kachinski v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.