Case law

Romansky v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

569 Pa. 233 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2002

Pascoe v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

573 Pa. 604 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 2003

Davis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

573 Pa. 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2003

Betancourt v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Exel, Inc.)

169 A.3d 4 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2017

Beaty v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

566 Pa. 239 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2001

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Heinel Motors, Inc.

344 Pa. 238 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1942

We were in that instance dealing with an administrative agency, an arm of the legislature: Com. v. Benn, 284 Pa. 421 , 131 A. 253 . … Chief Justice Brown, speaking for the court on the right of the Commission to appeal, said that it “may be said to become a party to the record by the filing of its answer.”

Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

553 Pa. 68 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1998

The Order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is reinstated. NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Walker v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

713 A.2d 1144 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 1998

Lear v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

827 A.2d 373 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 2003

Lear v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

573 Pa. 512 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 2003

Hannon v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

825 A.2d 617 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2003

Hannon v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

573 Pa. 353 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2003

Ashline v. Bristol Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

408 Pa. 245 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1962

Justice Eagen, This is an appeal from an order of the court below affirming a decision of a township zoning board of adjustment, which denied a special exception for the extension of an alleged nonconforming use. … An accessory use cannot be the basis for the establishment of a nonconforming principal use: Stokes v. *248 Zoning Board of Adjustment, 402 Pa. 508 , 167 A. 2d 316 (1961).

McLane v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

562 Pa. 609 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2000

Shelton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

562 Pa. 392 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2000

Shaffer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

819 A.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2003

Schneider, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bey)

560 Pa. 608 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2000

Schneider appealed the WCJ’s decision to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board). … Bey then appealed the suspension to the Board. The Board reversed the WCJ’s suspension of benefits, relying on the *612 decision of the Commonwealth Court in Sheehan v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Bd.

Jones v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

572 Pa. 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2003

Graybill & Bushong, Inc. v. Board of Finance & Revenue

414 Pa. 70 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1964

Highway Paving Company v. Board of Arbitration of Claims, 407 Pa. 528 , 180 A. 2d 896 (1962); Badali v. Hartman, 410 Pa. 652 , 190 A. 2d 301 (1963). … See The Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 80 Dauph. 326 (1963).

Borough of Emmaus v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

171 A.3d 1284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2017