Case law

Podobensky v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

905 A.2d 917 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2006

Swade v. Springfield Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

392 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1958

Knight : “The facts are fully set forth in the findings of the Board of Adjustment and the hearing judge and it is unnecessary to repeat them here. … That since the business of the appellant has no reasonable relationship to the public health, safety and morals, the Board of Adjustment had no discretion in the matter and should have granted the variance. “2.

Feight v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

905 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2006

Curry v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

905 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2006

Curry v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

588 Pa. 535 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2006

McCole v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

576 Pa. 619 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 2003

Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

537 Pa. 426 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1994

Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Petrisek), 537 Pa. 32 , 640 A.2d 1266 (1994). … In affirming the Board, the Commonwealth Court relied upon subsection (d) above and its own holding in Boro of Midland v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Granito), 127 Pa.Cmwlth.Ct. 462, 561 A.2d 1332 (1989).

Marvin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

902 A.2d 509 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 2006

Bethlehem Mines v. WORKER'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

578 Pa. 3 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2004

. § 834, and Daniels v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Tristate Transport), 574 Pa.61, 828 A.2d 1043 (2003).

Herbert v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

864 A.2d 1198 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2004

Smith v. PA. Board of Probation & Parole

834 A.2d 1139 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2003

Tomson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

583 Pa. 273 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2005

Jackson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

832 A.2d 1013 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2003

Jackson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

574 Pa. 573 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2003

Bartholomew v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

580 Pa. 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2004

Stewart v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

575 Pa. 3 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 2003

Irwin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

580 Pa. 334 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2004

Massey v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

509 Pa. 256 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1985

We granted allocatur in this case in conjunction with Rivenbark v. … Each one of these convictions may be considered as a separate parole violation by the Board and the presumptive ranges of each may be aggregated. Corley v.

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

550 Pa. 658 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1998

The Commonwealth Court affirmed the board. Citing our decisions in Farquhar v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Corning Glass Works), 515 Pa. 315 , 528 A.2d 580 (1987) and Pawlosky v. … Lash v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 491 Pa. 294 , 420 A.2d 1325 (1980).

Nellom v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

580 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2004